Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:19:20.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimization of the potting design using an approach for load path optimized designs of sandwich structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Johann Schellhorn ,
Lukas Schwan  and
Dieter Krause
Johann Schellhorn*
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology, Germany
Lukas Schwan
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology, Germany
Dieter Krause
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology, Germany
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In sandwich structures, mass can be reduced or mechanical properties increased if the challenging local load distribution can be improved. Through numerical optimizations, novel designs can be determined and investigated in physical and virtual tests. This paper presents an approach for load path-optimized design of sandwich structures and novel design concepts. The approach is applied to the design concept of honeycombs filled with potting compound. Due to the shown transferability to higher structural levels, it can be used as a basis for the design optimization of any sandwich structure.

Keywords

sandwich designdesign optimisationinsertsvirtual testinglightweight design
Type
Engineering Design Practice
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 3013 - 3022
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Bitzer, T. (1997), Honeycomb technology - Materials, Design, Manufacturing, Applications and Testing, Springer, Dodrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5856-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Requirements, ESA and Division, Standards (2011), Space Engineering: Insert design handbook, ESA Requirements and Standards Division, Noordwijk.Google Scholar
EASA European Union Aviation Safety Agency (2023), CS-25 Certification Specifications and Acceptable Means of Compliance for Large Aeroplanes.Google Scholar
Hanna, M., Schwenke, J., Schwan, L., Krause, D. (2022), “Methodical Approach for the Model-Based Development of Aircraft Cabin Product Families under Consideration of Lightweight and Cost-Based Design”, Proceedings of the Design 2022/17th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 23-26, 2022, The Design Society, Glasgow, pp. 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartwich, T. S., Schwenke, J., Schwan, L., Krause, D. (2022), “Classification and Development of New Component Tests for Aircraft Cabin Interior”, Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Composite Materials (ECCM20), Lausanne, Switzerland, June 26-30, 2022, EPFL, Lausanne. https://doi.org/10.5075/epfl-298799_978-2-9701614-0-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimbs, S., Pein, M. (2009), “Failure behaviour of honeycomb sandwich corner joints and inserts”, Composite Structures, Vol. 89 No 4, pp. 575–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.11.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyden, E., Hartwich, T. S., Schwenke, J. and Krause, D. (2019), “Transferability of Boundary Conditions and Validation of Lightweight Structures”, Proceedings of the 30th Symposium Design for X (DFX 2019), Jesteburg, Germany, September 18-19, 2019, The Design Society, Glasgow, pp. 85–96. https://doi.org/10.35199/dfx2019.8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, D., Schwenke, J., Gumpinger, T. and Plaumann, B. (2018), “Leichtbau”, In: Rieg, F. and Steinhilper, R. (Eds.), Handbuch Konstruktion, Carl Hanser Verlag, München, pp. 487–507. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446456198.017Google Scholar
Qi, G., Chen, Y., Rauschen, P., Schröder, K., Ma, L. (2020), “Characteristics of an improved boundary insert for sandwich panels with lattice truss cores”, Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Ramírez, J., Castanié, B., Bouvet, C. (2020), “Insert of sandwich panels sizing through a failure mode map”, Composite Structures, Vol. 234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111724.Google Scholar
Roy, R., Nguyen, K.H., Park, Y.B., Kweon, J.H., Choi, J.H. (2014), “Testing and modeling of Nomex™ honeycomb sandwich Panels with bolt insert”, Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 56, pp. 762–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwan, L., Hüttich, P., Wegner, M. and Krause, D. (2021), “Procedure for the transferability of application-specific boundary conditions for the testing of components and products”, Proceedings of the 32nd Symposium Design for X (DFX 2021), Tutzing, Germany, September 27-28, 2021, The Design Society, Glasgow. https://doi.org/10.35199/dfx2021.04Google Scholar
Schwan, L., Schwenke, J., Hartwich, T. S., Krause, D. (2022), “Virtual Testing of Honeycomb Sandwich Structures with Multiple Load Introduction Points”, Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Composite Materials (ECCM20), Lausanne, Switzerland, June 26-30, 2022, EPFL, Lausanne. https://doi.org/10.5075/epfl-298799_978-2-9701614-0-0Google Scholar
Schwan, L., Schellhorn, J., Krause, D. (2023), “Component Testing of Sandwich Structures with more Realistic Boundary Conditions”, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM23), Belfast, 31 July-04 August 2023.Google Scholar
Schwenke, J., Hartwich, T. S., Krause, D. (2020), “Optimierung von Inserts in Sandwichstrukturen durch additive Fertigung”, In: Lachmayer, R., Lippert, R., Kaierle, S. (Eds.), Konstruktion für die Additive Fertigung 2018, Springer Vieweg, Berlin, pp. 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59058-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwenke, J., Schwan, L., Hanna, M., Krause, D. (2022), “Ansatz zur lastpfadoptimierten Gestaltung von Sandwichstrukturen mithilfe virtueller Tests und realitätsnahen Testaufbauten”, Proceedings of the 33rd Symposium Design for X (DFX 2022), Hamburg, Germany, September 22-23, 2022. https://doi.org/10.35199/dfx2022.05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seemann, R., Krause, D. (2018), Numerical modelling of partially potted inserts in honeycomb sandwich panels under pull-out loading, Composite Structures, Vol. 203, pp. 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seemann, R. (2020), A Virtual Testing Approach for Honeycomb Sandwich Panel Joints in Aircraft Interior, Springer Vieweg, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, J. W., Lee, D. G. (2011), “Development of the hybrid insert for composite sandwich satellite structures”, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, Vol. 42 No. 8, pp. 1040–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwenke, J. and Krause, D. (2020): “Optimization of load introduction points in sandwich structures with additively manufactured cores”, Design Science, Vol. 6 No. 13. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zenkert, D. (1997), The handbook of sandwich construction, Engineering Materials Advisory Services, Cradley Heath, West Midlands.Google Scholar