Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:34:20.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New combination of methods for supporting a simplified set-based design approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Mikael Ström ,
Göran Gustafsson  and
Johannesson Hans
Mikael Ström*
Affiliation:
RISE, Sweden
Göran Gustafsson
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Johannesson Hans
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This work presents a Set-Based Design inspired approach for generation, evaluation and reduction of a solution space of alternative product concepts. Also, the aspect of how to implement the process in an industrial environment was investigated. The hypothesis, confirmed by case studies, is that it can be done using existing methods like Enhanced functional modelling, brainwriting, the Gallery method, Axiomatic Design, causal diagrams and Pugh matrices. The method can be successfully introduced in a timeframe of a few working days and support development engineers in the concept design phase.

Keywords

set-based designaxiomatic designcausal diagramsconceptual designsystematic approach nineteenth
Type
Design Theory and Research Methods
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 135 - 144
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Al-Ashaab, A., Golob, M., Attia, U.M., Khan, M., Parsons, J. et al. (2013), “The transformation of product development process into lean environment using set-based concurrent engineering: A case study from an aerospace industry”, Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, Vol. 21, No 4, pp. 268-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X13495220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almefelt, L. and Claesson, A. (2015), “Design methodology applied for product innovation in a multi-disciplinary project – a case study”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, Vol. 8, No. DS 80-08, pp. 101-110. Politecnico di Milano, Italy.Google Scholar
Araci, Z.C., Al-Ashaab, A. and Garcia Almeida, C. (2021), “Physics-based trade-off curves to develop a control access product in set-based concurrent engineering environment”, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp. 824-846. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-10-2016-0061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, J., Köhler, C., Wanke, S. and Weber, C. (2008), “What is design knowledge from the viewpoint of CPM/PDD?”, DESIGN 2008, Dubrovnik - Croatia, pp. 745-751.Google Scholar
Esnal-Angulo, I. and Hernandis-Ortuño, B. (2019), “Behaviour study of an eccentric pulley transmission system using systemic methods”, DYNA, Vol. 86, No. 210, pp. 204-210. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v86n210.76073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyzioglu, A., and Kar, A.K. (2017), “Axiomatic Design Approach for Nonlinear Multiple Objective Optimization Problem and Robustness”, Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1515/cait-2017-0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gericke, K., Eckert, C., Campean, F., Clarkson, P.J., Flening, E., Isaksson, O., Kipouros, T., Kokkolaras, M., Köhler, C., Panarotto, M. and Wilmsen, M. (2020), “Supporting designers: moving from method menagerie to method ecosystem”, Design Science, Vol. 6, No. E21. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, G., Raudberget, D., and Ström, M. (2016), “Unveiling Fundamental Relationships in Industrial Product Development”. Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50, pp. 204-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannesson, H. and Claesson, A. (2005) “Systematic Product Platform Design: A Combined Function-Means and Parametric Modelling Approach”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820512331325247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamala, S., Chauhan, P.J., Panda, S.K., Wilson, G., Liu, X. and Gupta, A.K. (2018), “Methodology to qualify marine electrical propulsion system architectures for platform supply vessels”, IET Electrical Systems in Transportation, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-est.2017.0080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linsey, J.S., Clauss, E.F., Kurtoglu, T., Murphy, J.T., Wood, K.L. and Markman, A.B. (2011) “An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 133, No. 3. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luedeke, T. F., Köhler, C., Conrad, J., Grashiller, M., Ruf, T., et al. (2018), “CPM/PDD as an integrated product and process model for a design-thinking based, agile product development process”, DESIGN 2018, Cavtat, Dubrovnik, pp. 2063-2073. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0311Google Scholar
Müller, J.R., Isaksson, O., Landahl, J., Raja, V., Panarotto, M., Levandowski, C. and Raudberget, D. (2019) “Enhanced function-means modelling supporting design space exploration”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing, Volume 33, Special Issue 4, pp. 502-516. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060419000271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., and Grote, K.-H. (2007), “Engineering Design - A Systematic Approach. 3rd ed.”, Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, K., Bailey, R., Allen, J.K., and Mistree, F. (2000), “Validating design methods & research: the validation square”, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, pp. 1-12.Google Scholar
Pugh, S., (1991), “Total design”, Addison-Wesley, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Raudberget, D., Ström, M., and Elgh, F. (2018), “Supporting Innovation and Knowledge Transfer from Individual to Corporate Level”, Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, Volume 7, pp. 576-585. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-898-3-576Google Scholar
Salustri, F.A., and Parmar, J. (2004), “Diagrammatic visualisation of early product development information”, Proceedings of DTM04: Design Theory and Methodology, 2004, Salt Lake City, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2004-57013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shallcross, N., Parnell, G.S., Pohl, E., Specking, E., (2020), “Set-based design: The state-of-practice and research opportunities, Systems Engineering”, Vol. 23, No. 5. pp. 557-578. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21549Google Scholar
Sobek, D., Ward, C.A. and Liker, J.K. (1999) “Toyota's Principles of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Winter.Google Scholar
Specking, E., Whitcomb, C., Parnell, G.S., Goerger, S.R., Pohl, E., and Kundeti, N.S.A. (2018), “Literature Review: Exploring the Role of Set-Based Design in Trade-off Analytics”, Naval Engineers Journal, American Society of Naval Engineers, Vol. 130, No. 2, pp. 51-62.Google Scholar
Ström, M., (2022), Applying lean principles and set-based approaches in product development, [PhD Thesis], Chalmers University of Technology. ISBN 978-91-7905-699-5.Google Scholar
Ström, M., Raudberget, D., and Gustafsson, G. (2016) “Development of a methodology to implement set-based design in a day”. Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN 2016, Cavtat, Dubrovnik, pp. 523-532.Google Scholar
Ström, M., Wolf, K., Jean-Jean, J., Gustafsson, G., and Johannesson, J. (2023) “A set-based-inspired design process supported by axiomatic design and interactive evolutionary algorithms” Int. J of Prod. Dev., Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 186-212. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2023.133054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ström, M., Raudberget, D., and Gustafsson, G. (2016) “Instant Set-based Design, an Easy Path to Set-based Design”. Procedia CIRP Design Conference 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suh, N. (1990), “The Principles of Design”, New York, NY, USA, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Toche, B., Pellerin, R., and Fortin, C. (2020), “Set-based design: a review and new directions”, Design Science, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 6, No. 18. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.16Google Scholar
Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. (2012), “Product Design and Development, 5th ed.”, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wu, Z., Cheng, X. and Yuan, J. (2012) “Applying Axiomatic Design Theory to the Multi-objective Optimization of Disk Brake”, 5th International Conference on Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture, CCTA 2011, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Springer, Berlin, Germany Vol. 370, No. 3, pp. 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27275-2_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar