Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:07:06.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Model-Based Definition Accelerates Product Life Cycle in Manufacturing and Inspection Phase – Experiment of Machined One-Off Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

P. Uski
Affiliation:
Etteplan Finland Ltd, Finland
A. Ellman*
Affiliation:
Tampere University, Finland
I. Laine
Affiliation:
Tampere University, Finland
L. Hillman
Affiliation:
Tampere University of Applied Sciences, Finland
J. Nieminen
Affiliation:
Tampere University of Applied Sciences, Finland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The paper focuses on comparative experiment on manufacturing and inspection of two different prismatic one-off parts, which have different complexity. Our experiment shows that transforming product definition method from the Drawing Centric Definition (DCD) to the Model Centric Definition (MCD) enables 28%-29% time savings in manufacturing and inspection phases of machined one-off part's life cycle. Furthermore, transition from MCD to Model-Based Definition (MBD) enables 5%-9% time savings, respectively. Applying of MBD enables more time savings in complex part compared to a less complex part.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

The AP242 standard project. (2009). Development of a Convergent Modular STEP Application Protocol Based on AP 203 and AP 214: STEP AP 242 – Managed Model Based 3D Engineering http://www.ap242.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=157a9a8f-6888-4589-906d-71d09e75878c&groupId=52520Google Scholar
Alemanni, M, Destefanis, F and Vezzetti, E (2011) Model-based definition design in the product lifecycle management scenario. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 52(1–4): 114. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-2699-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijnens, J and Cheshire, D. The current state of model-based definition. Comput Aided Des Appl 2019; 16:308317. DOI: 10.14733/cadaps.2019.308-317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, C, Brown, G, Siebenaler, D, et al. . (2010) Model Based Definition. In: 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Orlando, 2010. ISSN 2010-3138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camba, J, Contero, M, Johnson, M, et al. . (2014) Extended 3D annotations as a new mechanism to explicitly communicate geometric design intent and increase CAD model reusability. CAD Computer Aided Design 57. Elsevier Ltd: 6173. DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2014.07.001.Google Scholar
Chandrasegaran, SK, Ramani, K, Sriram, RD, et al. . (2013) The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems. In: CAD Computer Aided Design, 2013, pp. 204228. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2012.08.006.Google Scholar
Ellman, A., Paronen, J., Juuti, T, Tiainen, T (2018) Re-Use of Engineering Design Rationale in Finnish SME Project Based Industry. Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference pp 18251832. DOI: 10.21278/idc.2018.0363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmer, C., Hofmann, T, et al. . (2018) A neutral approach for interoperability in the field of 3D measurement data management. Journal of Industrial Information Integration 12(2018) pp 4756. ELSEVIER. DOI: 10.1016/j.jii.2018.01.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedberg, T, Lubell, J, Fischer, L, et al. . Testing the digital thread in support of model-based manufacturing and inspection. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 2016; 16: 021001.Google ScholarPubMed
ISO 44001:2017 Collaborative business relationship management systems — Requirements and framework. 2017-03, https://www.iso.org/standard/72798.html (accessed 29.2.2020).Google Scholar
Paulus-Rohmer, D., Schatton, H., Bauernhansl, T.: Ecosystems, strategy and business models in the age of digitization - How the manufacturing industry is going to change its logic. In: Editor, F., Editor, S. (eds.) 49th CIRP CONFERENCE on Manufacturing Systems (CIRP-CMS 2016) 2016, vol. 57, pp. 813. Elsevier B.V., (2016).Google Scholar
Peltola, J (2020) Model Based Definition of Machined Part. Tampere. Available at: http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202008246598 (accessed 8 November 2020).Google Scholar
Pfouga, A, Stjepandić, J (2018) Leveraging 3D geometric knowledge in the product lifecycle based on industrial standards. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering 5(2018) pp 5467. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcde.2017.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randselva Bridge, Tekla (2020). Available at: https://www.tekla.com/bim-awards/randselva-bridge (accessed 7 November 2020).Google Scholar
Ruemler, SP, Zimmerman, KE, Hartman, NW, et al. . (2017) Promoting model-based definition to establish a complete product definition. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME 139(5). American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). DOI: 10.1115/1.4034625.Google Scholar
Quintana, V, Rivest, L, Pellerin, R, et al. . (2010) Will Model-based Definition replace engineering drawings throughout the product lifecycle? A global perspective from aerospace industry. Computers in Industry 61(5): 497508. DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2010.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uski, P, Pulkkinen, A, Hillman, L, et al. . (2020) Issues on Introducing Model-Based Definition-Case of Manufacturing Ecosystem. In: 10 November 2020. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-62807-9_48.Google Scholar