Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:42:03.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

METHODS OF CHANGE IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Viktoria Mordaschew ,
Jan-Phillip Herrmann  and
Sven Tackenberg
Viktoria Mordaschew*
Affiliation:
OWL University of Applied Sciences and Arts
Jan-Phillip Herrmann
Affiliation:
OWL University of Applied Sciences and Arts
Sven Tackenberg
Affiliation:
OWL University of Applied Sciences and Arts
*
Mordaschew, Viktoria, OWL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Germany, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During product development, the customer or internal stakeholders initiate changes concerning the components or functions of a cyber-physical system (CPS). The complexity of such a CPS causes difficulties in evaluating the effects of a component change. Accordingly, product developers need an assistance system to quantify the impact of a component change on hardware, software, system functions, and production processes. Therefore, this paper focuses on concepts to evaluate the effects of component, functional, and process changes and contributes to its clarification and further understanding of the importance and requirements for such an assistance system. The literature review assesses the identified methods regarding their objectives, application objects, level of automation, and relations characteristics. However, the literature review pointed out that the change prediction method from Clarkson et al. (2004) is well-established in the literature and able to quantify the impact of a change.

Keywords

Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)Change ImpactComplexityUncertainty
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 2655 - 2664
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Browning, T.R. (2001), “Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 48 No. 3, pp. 292–306. http://doi.org/10.1109/17.946528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L. and Whyte, J. (2021), “Understanding design change propagation in complex engineering systems using a digital twin and design structure matrix”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 29 No. 8, pp. 2950–2975. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2020-0615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y., Cheng, P. and Yin, J. (2010), “Change propagation analysis of trustworthy requirements based on dependency relations”, IEEE International Conference on Information Management and Engineering, Chengdu, China, 16-18 April 2010, IEEE, IEEE Xplore pp. 246–251 http://doi.org/10.1109/ICIME.2010.5477679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, X., Guo, Z., X, M.. and Yuan, T. (2021), “Identification of Influential Modules Considering Design Change Impacts Based on Parallel Breadth-First Search and Bat Algorithm”, Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, Vol. 9, p. 791566. http://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.791566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarkson, P.J., Simons, C. and Eckert, C. (2004), “Predicting Change Propagation in Complex Design”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 126 No. 5, pp. 788–797. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.1765117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danilovic, M.; Browning, T. R. (2007): “Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices” International Journal of Project Management 25 (3), pp. 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drossel, W.-G., Ihlenfeldt, S., Langer, T. and Dumitrescu, R. (2018), “Cyber-Physische Systeme”, In: Neugebauer, R. (Ed.), Digitalisierung, Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 197–222. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55890-4_12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, C.M., Keller, R. and Clarkson, P.J. (2011), “Change prediction in innovative products to avoid emergency innovation”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 55 No. 3/4, p. 226–237. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2011.041949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, T.L., Eckert, C.M., Eger, T., Smith, J. and Clarkson, P.J. (2003), “A FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF CHANGE PROPAGATION”, DS 31: Proceedings of ICED 03, International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm, 441-442 (exec.summ.), full paper no. DS31_1064FP.Google Scholar
Fu, Y., Li, M. and Chen, F. (2012), “Impact propagation and risk assessment of requirement changes for software development projects based on design structure matrix”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 363–373. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamraz, B., Caldwell, N.H.M. and Clarkson, P.J. (2012), “A Multidomain Engineering Change Propagation Model to Support Uncertainty Reduction and Risk Management in Design”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 134 No. 10, 100905. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamraz, B., Caldwell, N.H.M. and Clarkson, P.J. (2013), “A Matrix-Calculation-Based Algorithm for Numerical Change Propagation Analysis”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 60 No. 1, pp. 186–198. http://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2012.2203307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S.Y., Moon, S.K., Oh, H.S., Park, T., Kyung, G. and Park, K.J. (2013), “Change propagation analysis for sustainability in product design”, IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Bangkok, Thailand, 10-13 December 2013, IEEE, IEEE Xplore, pp. 872–876. http://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, E.C.Y., Förg, A., Kreimeyer, M. and Lienkamp, M. (2015), “Using engineering change forecast to prioritise component modularisation”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 337–353. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-015-0200-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, J.F., Wynn, D.C., Biedermann, W., Lindemann, U. and Clarkson, P.J. (2014), “Simulating progressive iteration, rework and change propagation to prioritise design tasks”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 283–307. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-014-0174-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, M. and Lindemann, U. (2007), “Structural awareness in complex product design – the Multiple-Domain Matrix”, DSM 2007: Proceedings of the 9th International DSM Conference, Munich, Germany, 16.-18.10.2007, Design Society, pp. 87–100.Google Scholar
McHugh, M.L. (2012), “Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic”, Biochemia medica, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 276–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morkos, B., Shankar, P. and Summers, J.D. (2012), “Predicting requirement change propagation, using higher order design structure matrices: an industry case study”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 23 No. 12, pp. 905–926. http://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2012.662273.Google Scholar
Nonsiri, S., Coatanea, E., Bakhouya, M. and Mokammel, F. (2013), “Model-based approach for change propagation analysis in requirements”, 7th Annual IEEE Systems Conference, 4/15/2013 - 4/18/2013, Orlando, FL, IEEE, pp. 497–503. http://doi.org/10.1109/SysCon.2013.6549928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oduncuoglu, A. and Thomson, V. (2011), “EVALUATING THE RISK OF CHANGE PROPAGATION”, DS 68-10: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society through Engineering Design, Vol. 10: Design Methods and Tools pt. 2, Copenhagen, Denmark, 15.-19.08.2011, pp. 114–125.Google Scholar
Rajinia, E. and Li, S. (2010), “Estimation of the Scope of Change Propagation in Object-Oriented Programming”, Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 3: 30th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Parts A and B. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. August 15–18, 2010. pp. 1203–1212 http://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2010-28773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saoud, L.A., Omran, J., Hassan, B., Vilutienė, T. and Kiaulakis, A. (2017), “A method to predict change propagation within building information model”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 836–846. http://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1323006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheinpflug, R. (2017), “Komplexität – Herausforderungen für Unternehmen und Management”, In: Scheinpflug, R., Stolzenberg, K. (Ed.) Neue Komplexität in Personalarbeit und Führung, Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp. 11–28. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16135-4_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlick, C.M., Duckwitz, S., Hinrichsen, S. and Licht, T. (2007), “Komplexitätsbestimmung von Concurrent Engineering Projekten”, Industrie Management, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 25–28.Google Scholar
Schneider, S., Schlick, C.M., Röwenstrunk, M. and Mütze-Niewöhner, S. (2012), “SIMULATION OF PRODUCT CHANGE EFFECTS BASED ON DESIGN STRUCTURE AND DOMAIN MAPPING MATRICES, Proceedings of the 14th International DSM Conference, Kyoto, Japan, 13.-14. September 2012, Hanser, München, pp. 423–435. http://doi.org/10.3139/9783446434127.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steward, D.V. (1981), “The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-28 No. 3, pp. 71–74. http://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1981.6448589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Eck, N. J.; Waltman, L. (2010): Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84 (2), pp. 523–538. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, Z.-Y., Lv, Q.-L. and You, W.-Y. (2008), “Applying Dependency Structure Matrix and Monte Carlo simulation to predict change in construction project”, International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Kunming, China, 12-15 July 2008, IEEE, IEEE Xplore, pp. 670–675 http://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLC.2008.4620489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar