Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:30:46.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MANAGERS' UNDERSTANDING OF AGILE IN HARDWARE DEVELOPMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Silvia Orejuela ,
Damien Motte  and
Glenn Johansson
Silvia Orejuela*
Affiliation:
Lund University;
Damien Motte
Affiliation:
Lund University;
Glenn Johansson
Affiliation:
Lund University; Mälardalen University
*
Orejuela, Silvia, Lund University, Sweden, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The agile methodology is gaining attention among practitioners and researchers in hardware development. As a new methodology, it is a source of misunderstandings and misinterpretations. This is problematic at the managers' levels as they may hinder its adoption or lead to its impractical implementation and use. This study, therefore, aims to explore the manager's level of understanding of the agile methodology. The study identifies the similarities and differences between the fundamental elements of the agile methodology and the elements mentioned by managers in hardware development. The fundamental elements of the agile methodology are identified based on the elements presented in the Scrum method; the elements mentioned by managers are identified based on ten semi-structured interviews with managers in hardware development. The study shows that the understanding of the agile methodology varies largely among managers. The obtained detailed insights in the managers' level of understanding of the agile methodology could be used to develop appropriate support to facilitate its adoption and implementation.

Keywords

Agile hardware developmentScrumNew product developmentOrganisation of product developmentCase study
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 2515 - 2524
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Atzberger, A., Nicklas, S. J., Schrof, J., Weiss, S. and Paetzold, K. (2020), Agile Entwicklung physischer Produkte: Eine Studie zum aktuellen Stand in der industriellen Praxis, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland. https://doi.org/10.18726/2020_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atzberger, A. and Paetzold, K. (2019), “Current challenges of agile hardware development: What are still the pain points nowadays?”, In: 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design - ICED 19, Delft, The Netherlands, 5-8 August 2019, Cambridge University Press, Vol. DS 92, pp. 2209–2218. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., Jeffries, R., Kern, J., Marick, B., Martin, R., Mellor, S., Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J. and Thomas, D. (2001), “Manifesto for Agile Software Development”. Available at: https://agilemanifesto.org/ (accessed 2022, November 30).Google Scholar
Conforto, E. C. and Amaral, D. C. (2016), “Agile project management and stage-gate model—A hybrid framework for technology-based companies”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 40, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2016.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conforto, E. C., Salum, F., Amaral, D. C., da Silva, S. L. and de Almeida, L. F. M. (2014), “Can agile project management be adopted by industries other than software development?”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21410.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. G. and Sommer, A. F. (2016), “The Agile-Stage-Gate hybrid model: A promising new approach and a new research opportunity”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 33 No. 5, pp. 513–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. G. and Sommer, A. F. (2018), “Agile–Stage-Gate for manufacturers”, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 61 No. 2, pp. 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2018.1421380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. G. and Sommer, A. F. (2020), “New-Product Portfolio Management with Agile”, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 63 No. 1, pp. 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2020.1686291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M. and Lassenius, C. (2016), “Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review”, Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 119, pp. 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, K., Cooper, R. G., Vedsmand, T. and Nardelli, G. (2019), “Evaluating the agile-stage-gate hybrid model: Experiences from three SME manufacturing firms”, International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, Vol. 16 No.8, p. 1950048. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877019500482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989), “Building theories from case study research”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marzi, G., Ciampi, F., Dalli, D. and Dabic, M. (2021), “New product development during the last ten years: The ongoing debate and future avenues”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 68 No. 1, pp. 330–344. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2997386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. and Saldaña, J. (2020), Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, SAGE, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T., Atzberger, A., Gerling, C., Schrof, J., Weiss, S. and Paetzold, K. (2019), Agile Development of Physical Products: An Empirical Study about Potentials, Transition and Applicability, University of the German Federal Armed Forces, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Schwaber, K. and Sutherland, J. (2020), The Scrum Guide, Scrum.org. Available at: https://scrumguides.org/ (accessed 2022, November 30).Google Scholar
Sommer, A. F., Hedegaard, C., Dukovska-Popovska, I. and Steger-Jensen, K. (2015), “Improved product development performance through agile/stage-gate hybrids: The next-generation stage-gate process?”, Research Technology Management, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 34–45. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5801236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2018), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Zasa, F., Patrucco, A. S. and Pellizzoni, E. (2021), “Managing the hybrid organization: How can agile and traditional project management coexist?”, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 64 No. 1, pp. 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2021.1843331CrossRefGoogle Scholar