Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:09:40.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND CIRCULAR ECONOMY INDICATORS TO DESIGN SUSTAINABLE ELECTRIC OUTBOARDS: RESULTS FROM WORKSHOPS WITH INDUSTRIAL EXPERTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Michael Saidani ,
John Bayless ,
Dylan Huey ,
Harrison Kim  and
Kevin Anderson
Michael Saidani
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign;
John Bayless
Affiliation:
Brunswick Corporation
Dylan Huey
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign;
Harrison Kim*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign;
Kevin Anderson
Affiliation:
Brunswick Corporation
*
Kim, Harrison, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States of America, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To help industries in their sustainable and circular transition from internal combustion engine production to electric motor production, the deployment of (i) a sound environmental impact assessment methodology, such as life cycle analysis, coupled with (ii) Design for Re-X tools, such as circularity indicators, is instrumental. To demonstrate the industrial relevance and complementary of both approaches, two consecutive workshops are conducted with a major original equipment manufacturer of recreational boats and their associated engines. On this basis, two circularity indicator-based tools were used to quantify and enhance (i) the circularity potential of the electric outboard as a whole, and (ii) the circularity performance of the two most impactful components, based on the LCA results: the electric motor unit and the lithium-ion battery pack. In all, the practice sessions supported the generation of strategic and operational ideas to improve the circularity of the electric outboard. As the industrial participants found both frameworks easy to use and efficient, all the details and resources used to conduct, replicate, or adapt such workshops in other industrial contexts are shared.

Keywords

SustainabilityCircular economyDesign for X (DfX)
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 2445 - 2454
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Bhander, G. S., Hauschild, M., and McAloone, T. (2003), “Implementing life cycle assessment in product development”, Environmental Progress, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cayzer, S., Griffiths, P., and Beghetto, V. (2017), “Design of indicators for measuring product performance in the circular economy”, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 4-5, 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerdas, F., Thiede, S., Juraschek, M., Turetskyy, A., and Herrmann, C. (2017), “Shop-floor life cycle assessment”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 61, pp. 393–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciroth, A. (2007), “ICT for environment in life cycle applications openLCA—A new open source software for life cycle assessment”, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 209–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciroth, A., Di Noi, C., Lohse, T., and Srocka, M. (2019), OpenLCA 1.10. Comprehensive User Manual, GreenDelta GmbH, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Del Pizzo, A., Polito, R. M., Rizzo, R., and Tricoli, P. (2010), “Design criteria of on-board propulsion for hybrid electric boats”, XIX International Conference on Electrical Machines-ICEM 2010, Sept. 2010, IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz, A., Reyes, T., Baumgartner, R. J. and (2022), “Implementing circular economy strategies during product development”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 184, 106344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Saravia Ortiz-de-Montellano, C., and van der Meer, Y. (2022), “A Theoretical Framework for Circular Processes and Circular Impacts Through a Comprehensive Review of Indicators”, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemez, C., Chiu, J., Ryan, E. C., Sun, J., Dubrow, R., and Pascucilla, M. (2020), “Environmental and health impacts of electric service vessels in the recreational boating industry”, Water Practice and Technology, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 781–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huijbregts, M. A., et al. (2016), ReCiPe 2016: a harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level report I: characterization. RIVM report 2016-0104.Google Scholar
ISO-International Organization for Standardization. (2006), ISO 14040: 2006 Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework. In: ISO 14000 International Standards Compendium. Genève, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Kravchenko, M., Pigosso, D. C., and McAloone, T. C. (2020), “A Procedure to Support Systematic Selection of Leading Indicators for Sustainability Performance Measurement of Circular Economy Initiatives”, Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 3, 951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minami, S., Toki, T., Yoshikawa, N., Hanada, T., Ashida, M., Kitada, S. I., and Tsukuda, K. (2010), “A newly developed plug-in hybrid electric boat (PHEB)”, Journal of Asian Electric Vehicles, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1385–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reap, J., Roman, F., Duncan, S., and Bras, B. (2008), “A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment,” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 374–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saidani, M., Cluzel, F., Leroy, Y., and Auclaire, A. (2016), “Time-efficient eco-innovation workshop process in complex system industries”, Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016 14th International Design Conference, May 2016. Cavtat, Dubrovnik, Croatia.Google Scholar
Saidani, M., Cluzel, F., Leroy, Y., and Yannou, B. (2019a), “Testing the robustness of circularity indicators: empirical insights from workshops on an industrial product”, International Conference on Engineering (ICED 19), Aug. 2019, Proceedings of the Design Society, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 3401–3410.Google Scholar
Saidani, M., Kravchenko, M., Cluzel, F., Pigosso, D. C., Leroy, Y., and Kim, H. (2021), “Comparing life cycle impact assessment, circularity and sustainability indicators for sustainable design: results from a hands-on project with 87 engineering students”, International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 21), Aug. 2021, Proceedings of the Design Society, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 1, pp. 681–690.Google Scholar
Saidani, M., Cluzel, F., Leroy, Y., Pigosso, D., Kravchenko, M., and Kim, H. (2022), “Nexus Between Life Cycle Assessment, Circularity and Sustainability Indicators—Part II: Experimentations”, Circular Economy and Sustainability, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 1399–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saidani, M., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y., and Cluzel, F., (2017), “Hybrid top-down and bottom-up framework to measure products' circularity performance”, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design, (ICED 17), Aug. 2017, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
Saidani, M., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y., Cluzel, F., and Kendall, A. (2019b), “A taxonomy of circular economy indicators”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 207, pp. 542–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, P., Anggraeni, K., and Weber, U. (2019), “The relevance of circular economy practices to the sustainable development goals”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wernet, G., Bauer, C., Steubing, B., Reinhard, J., Moreno-Ruiz, E., and Weidema, B. (2016), “The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 21, No. 9, pp. 1218–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar