No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
INTEGRATING SOCIAL IMPACT MEASURES INTO THE AIRSHIP DESIGN PROCESS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2021
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Engineered products have economic, environmental, and social impacts, which comprise the major dimensions of sustainability. This paper seeks to determine the interaction between design parameters when the social impacts are incorporated into the design process. Social impact evaluation is increasing in importance similar to what has happened with environmental impact consideration in recent years in the design of engineered products. Concurrently, research into new airship design has increased, however airships have yet to be reintroduced at a large scale and for a range of applications in society. Although airships have the potential for positive environmental and economic impacts, the social impacts are still rarely considered. This paper presents a case study of the hypothetical introduction of airships in the Amazon to help local farmers transport their produce to market. It explores the design space in terms of the airship's social impacts connected to the design parameters. The social impacts are found to be dependent not only on the social factors and airship design parameters, but also on the farmer-airship system, suggesting that socio-technical systems design will benefit from integrated social impact metric analysis.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Burdge, R.J. (1995), A Community Guide to Social Impact Assessment, Social Ecology Press.Google Scholar
Carvalho, J.R.H., Rueda, M.Á.C., Azinheira, J.R., Moutinho, A., Mirisola, L.G.B., de Paiva, E.C., Nogueira, L.A.C.O., et al. (2019), “System Architecture of a Robotics Airship”, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55374-6_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castka, P. and Balzarova, M.A. (2008), “ISO 26000 and supply chains-On the diffusion of the social responsibility standard”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 111 No. 2, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.10.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkington, J. (1998), “Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business”, Environmental Quality Management, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 37–51.10.1002/tqem.3310080106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, P. (2015), Advanced Airship Technologies and Design Approaches, edited by Hunt, P. V., American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., Reston, VA, Available at: https://doi.org/10.2514/4.103520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vehicles, Hybrid Air. (2020), Airlander 10. [online] Hybrid Air Vehicles, Available at: https://www.hybridairvehicles.com/about-us/our-history// (accessed November 2020).Google Scholar
IBGE-Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2017), Censo Agropecuário de 2017, Rio de Janeiro, 775 p. Available at: https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/pesquisa/censo-agropecuario/censo-agropecuario-2017 (accessed November 2020).Google Scholar
Jeong, H.Y., Yu, D.J., Min, B.-C. and Lee, S. (2020), “The humanitarian flying warehouse”, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 136, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junior, W.C., Felippes, M.A. and de Souza Bronzeado, H. (2020), “A novel environmental friendly approach to enhance the maintenance and construction of high voltage transmission lines in the Amazon region”, 2020 IEEE EEEIC / I&CPS Europe, IEEE, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEIC/ICPSEurope49358.2020.9160562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khoury, G.A. (2012), Airship Technology, edited by Khoury, G., 2nd Edition., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Martin, Lockheed. (2020), Hybrid Airship. [online] Lockheed Martin, Available at: https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/hybrid-airship.html (accessed November 2020).Google Scholar
Martinot, J. F., Pereira, H. dos, S., and Silva, S. C. P. da. (2017). Coletar ou Cultivar: as escolhas dos produtores de açaí-da-mata (Euterpe precatoria) do Amazonas. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 55(4), 751–766.10.1590/1234-56781806-94790550408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattson, C.A., Pack, A.T., Lofthouse, V. and Bhamra, T. (2019), “Using a Product's Sustainability Space as a Design Exploration Tool”, Design Science, Vol. 5, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2018.6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattson, C.A., and Sorensen, C.D. (2019). Product Development: Principles and Tools for Creating Desirable and Transferable Designs. Springer Nature.Google Scholar
Ottosson, H.J., Mattson, C.A. and Dahlin, E.C. (2020), “Analysis of Perceived Social Impacts of Existing Products Designed for the Developing World, With Implications for New Product Development”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 142 No. 5, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paramalingam, R., England, R., Mollura, D. and Koff, D. (2020), “Expanding the reach of global health radiology via the world's first medical hybrid airship: A SWOT analysis”, Journal of Global Health, University of Edinburgh, Vol. 10 No. 1, Available at: https://doi.org/10.7189/JOGH.10.010374.Google Scholar
Prentice, B. and Thomson, J.T. (2003), “Airship Applications in the Arctic: Preliminary Economic Assessment”, AIAA's 3rd Annual Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Forum, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virigina, Available at: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-6847.Google Scholar
Rainock, M., Everett, D., Pack, A., Dahlin, E.C. and Mattson, C.A. (2018), “The social impacts of products: a review”, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Taylor and Francis Ltd., Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 230–241.Google Scholar
Smith, I., Lee, M., Fortneberry, M. and Judy, R. (2011), “HiSentinel80: Flight of a High Altitude Airship”, 11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virigina, Available at: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-6973.Google Scholar
Starr, C. (1969), “Social Benefit versus Technological Risk”, Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Vol. 165 No. 3899, pp. 1232–1238.10.1126/science.165.3899.1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, P.D., Mattson, C.A. and Dahlin, E.C. (2020), “A Method for Creating Product Social Impact Models of Engineered Products”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 142 No. 4, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatham, P., Neal, C. and Wu, Y. (2017), “Hybrid cargo airships: a humanitarian logistic game changer?”, Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 102–125.Google Scholar
Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T. and Roos, D. (2007), The Machine That Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production-Toyota's Secret Weapon in the Global Car Wars That Is Now Revolutionizing World Industry, Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access