No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Implications of Creating Solution Concepts Based on the Use of References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 May 2022
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The use of already validated systems as references for the development of solution concepts offers the potential to increase process efficiency. It is important to understand how the use of references impacts the development of solution concepts. Therefore, the representation of solution concepts in an engineering project of two student cohorts are analyzed and compared. The first cohort is provided with few and the second cohort with extensive references. The results of the study show that the increased use of references leads to a higher share of embodiment and specific challenges.
Keywords
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2022.
References
Albers, A., Bursac, N. and Rapp, S. (2016), “PGE - Product generation engineering Case study of the dual mass flywheel”, in DS 84: Proceedings 2016, Vol. 84, pp. 791–800.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Bursac, N. and Wintergerst, E. (2015), “Produktgenerationsentwicklung – Bedeutung und Herausforderungen aus einer entwicklungsmethodischen Perspektive”, in Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung SSP 2015, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Heitger, N., Haug, F., Fahl, J., Hirschter, T. and Bursac, N. (2018a), “Supporting Potential Innovation in the Early Phase of PGE - Product Generation Engineering: Structuring the Development of the Initial System of Objectives”.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Matthiesen, S., Rapp, S., Hölz, K. and Bursac, N. (2018b), “PGE-Product Generation Engineering in Engineering Education: Real-World Problems for Beginners in Student Projects”, EPDE, Vol. 2018.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Rapp, S., Birk, C. and Bursac, N. (2017), “Die Frühe Phase der PGE – Produktgenerationsentwicklung”, in 4. Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung, pp. 345–354.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Rapp, S., Spadinger, M., Richter, T., Birk, C., Marthaler, F., Heimicke, J., Kurtz, V. and Wessels, H. (2019), “The Reference System in the Model of PGE: Proposing a Generalized Description of Reference Products and their Interrelations”, 5-8 August, Delft, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Albers, A. and Wintergerst, E. (2014), “The Contact and Channel Approach (C&C2-A): Relating a System's Physical Structure to Its Functionality”, in Chakrabarti, A. and Blessing, L.T.M. (Eds.), An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design, Springer London, London, pp. 151–171.Google Scholar
Alblas, A. and Jayaram, J. (2015), “Design resilience in the fuzzy front end (FFE) context: an empirical examination”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 53 No. 22, pp. 6820–6838.Google Scholar
Bender, B. and Gericke, K. (Eds.) (2021), Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre: Methoden und Anwendung erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung, 9th ed. 2021.Google Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, K. and Meerkamm, H. (2017), Integrierte Produktentwicklung: Denkabläufe, Methodeneinsatz, Zusammenarbeit, Hanser eLibrary, 6th ed., Carl Hanser Verlag, München.Google Scholar
Endriss, L. (2021), “Aufblühen oder Verwelken. Selbstverwirklichung und Bedürfnispyramide”, pp. 109–115.Google Scholar
Gericke, K., Bender, B., Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. and Grote, K.-H. (2021), “Funktionen und deren Strukturen”, in Bender, B. and Gericke, K. (Eds.), Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre: Methoden und Anwendung erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung, 9th ed. 2021, pp. 233–254.Google Scholar
Hatchuel, A. and Weil, B. (2003), “A new approach of innovative design: an introduction to CK theory”, in Folkeson, A. (Ed.), ICED 03, 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, 19-21 August, Stockholm, Sweden, Design Society, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Heimicke, J., Reiß, N., Albers, A., Walter, B., Breitschuh, J., Knoche, S. and Bursac, N. (2018), “Agile Innovative Impulses in Product Generation Engineering: Creativity by Intentional Forgetting. International Conference on Design Creativity”, Proceedings of 2018, Bath, The Design Society, Bath, UK, pp. 183–190.Google Scholar
Matthiesen, S. (2021), “Gestaltung – Prozess und Methoden”, in Bender, B. and Gericke, K. (Eds.), Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre: Methoden und Anwendung erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung, 9th ed. 2021, 397 - 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfaff, F., Rapp, S. and Albers, A. (2021), “Modelling and Visualizing Knowledge on the Reference System and Variations Based on the Model of PGE - Product Generation Engineering for Decision Support”, 16-20 August 2021, Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
Richter, T., Rapp, S., Kurtz, V., Romanov, V. and Albers, A. (2019), “Creating innovative products with reference system elements - a case study on approaches in practice”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 84, pp. 804–809.Google Scholar
Ropohl, G. (2009), Allgemeine Technologie eine Systemtheorie der Technik, KIT Scientific Publishing, Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
Sivaloganathan, S. and Shahin, T.M.M. (1999), “Design reuse: An overview”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 213 No. 7, pp. 641–654.Google Scholar
VDI (2019a), Design of technical products and systems: Configuration of individual product design processes No. VDI 2221 Part 2, Beuth, Berlin.Google Scholar
VDI (2019b), Design of technical products and systems: Model of product design No. VDI 2221 Part 1, Beuth, BerlinGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access