Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:01:15.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IDENTIFICATION OF PERCEIVED RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS IN ECODESIGN PROJECTS: THE CASE OF RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Joseph Mansour Salamé ,
Yann Leroy ,
Michael Saidani  and
Isabelle Nicolaï
Joseph Mansour Salamé*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Genie Industriel, Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, France;
Yann Leroy
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Genie Industriel, Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, France;
Michael Saidani
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Genie Industriel, Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, France; Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Isabelle Nicolaï
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Genie Industriel, Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, France;
*
Mansour Salamé, Joseph, CentraleSupelec - University Paris Saclay, France, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sharing information between stakeholders is a critical success factor for ecodesign projects. This sharing is based on indicators that can be interrelated, i.e., impacting each other.

This article focuses on the perception of environmental performance indicators’ relationships during the design phase of projects. It uses a DEMATEL approach combined with a graph-database visualization linking environmental performance indicators. While the DEMATEL approach highlights the critical environmental indicators, the graph-based visualization maps the primary interrelations of these factors and defines the best scale to manage them. The novelty here lies in the complementary use of these two methods to facilitate environmental project monitoring.

This research is applied to rail infrastructure projects. The main results insist on land optimization, landscape insertion, carbon footprint, economic benefits, and biodiversity measures as critical factors when designing these projects. The graph-based visualization maps the main oriented links between indicators, allowing managers to identify the gaps between the perceived knowledge and the ground truth, facilitating their project monitoring.

Keywords

EcodesignProject managementInformation managementEnvironmental performance indicatorsRail projects
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 2185 - 2194
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Angelakoglou, K., and Gaidajis, G. (2020), “A Conceptual Framework to Evaluate the Environmental Sustainability Performance of Mining Industrial Facilities”, Sustainability Vol. 12, pp. 2135–2154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddache, F., and Nicolai, I. (2013), “Follow the leader: how corporate social responsibility influences strategy and practice in the business community”, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 34 No. 6, pp.26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bey, N., Hauschild, M. Z., and McAloone, T. C. (2013), “Drivers and barriers for implementation of environmental strategies in manufacturing companies”, Cirp Annals, Vol. 62 No. 1, pp. 43–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, J., and Talaei-Khoei, A. (2016), “Developing a Conceptual Model to Evaluate Green Suppliers: Decision Making Method using DEMATEL, Proceedings of 22nd Americas Conferences on Information Systems, San Diego, 11-14 August 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3733658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falatoonitoosi, E., Ahmed, S., and Sorooshian, S. (2014), Expanded DEMATEL for determining cause and effect group in bidirectional relations, The Scientific World Journal. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/103846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabus, A., and Fontela, E. (1972), “World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL”, Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Gani, A., Bhanot, N., Talib, F., and Asjad, M. (2022), “An integrated DEMATEL-MMDE-ISM approach for analyzing environmental sustainability indicators in MSMEs”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 29(2), pp. 2035–2051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15194-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gedam, V. V., Raut, R. D., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Tanksale, A. N., and Narkhede, B. E. (2021), “Circular economy practices in a developing economy: Barriers to be defeated”, Journal of Cleaner Production 311, 127670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISO, 2020. ISO 14006: 2020 “Environmental Management Systems – Guidelines for Incorporating Ecodesign”.Google Scholar
Jayant, A. and Agarwal, A. (2019), “A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, AHP and TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1240 (1).Google Scholar
Lamé, G., Leroy, Y., and Yannou, B. (2017), “Ecodesign tools in the construction sector: Analyzing usage inadequacies with designers' needs”, Journal of Cleaner Production Vol. 148, 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswell, H. D. (1948), “The structure and function of communication in society”, The communication of ideas, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 136–139.Google Scholar
Li, Z., Gómez, J. M., and Pehlken, A. (2015), “A systematic review of environmentally conscious product design”, Proceedings of EnviroInfo and ICT4S 2015, Copenhagen, 7-9 September 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. W., and Tzeng, G. H. (2009), “Identification of a threshold value for the DEMATEL method using the maximum mean de-entropy algorithm to find critical services provided by a semiconductor intellectual property mall”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 36 No.6, pp. 9891–9898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Y., Wang, H., and Zhao, X. (2022), “Analysis of factors affecting economic operation of electric vehicle charging station based on DEMATEL-ISM”, Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luthra, S., Mangla, S. K., Shankar, R., Prakash Garg, C., and Jakhar, S. (2018), “Modelling critical success factors for sustainability initiatives in supply chains in Indian context using Grey-DEMATEL”, Production Planning and Control, Vol. 29 No. 9, pp. 705–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1448126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangla, S. K., Luthra, S., Mishra, N., Singh, A., Rana, N. P., Dora, M., and Dwivedi, Y. (2018), “Barriers to effective circular supply chain management in a developing country context”, Production Planning and Control, Vol. 29 No.6, pp. 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1449265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansour Salamé, J., Leroy, Y., Saidani, M., Nicolai, I. (2021), “Understanding and Monitoring Environmental Performance of Infrastructure Design Projects”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21), Gothenburg, Sweden, 16-20 August 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. J. (2013), “Graph database applications and concepts with Neo4j”, Proceedings of the Southern Association for Information Systems Conference, Atlanta, 23-24 March 2013.Google Scholar
Pinto, M. M. A., Kovaleski, J. L., Yoshino, R. T., and Pagani, R. N. (2019), “Knowledge and technology transfer influencing the process of innovation in green supply chain management: A multicriteria model based on the DEMATEL Method”, Sustainability, Vol. 11 No. 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raut, R. D., Mangla, S. K., Narwane, V. S., Dora, M., and Liu, M. (2021), “Big Data Analytics as a mediator in Lean, Agile, Resilient, and Green (LARG) practices effects on sustainable supply chains”, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 145, 102170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rock, I. (1985), “Perception and Knwoledge”, Acta Psychologica Vol 59, pp.3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y. C., and Yao, Z. (October), “Using DEMATEL to Select Key Performance Evaluation Indicators of Green Supply Chain Management”, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Mechatronics and Industrial Informatics, Haikou, China, 27-29 October 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waas, T., Hugé, J., Block, T., Wright, T., Benitez-Capistros, F., & Verbruggen, A. (2014), “Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development”, Sustainability, Vol. 6 No. 9, pp. 5512–5534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, W. W. (2008), “Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach”, Expert systems with applications, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 828–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, A., Venkatesh, V. G., Wang, J. X., Mani, V., Wan, M., and Qu, T. (2021), “Drivers of industry 4.0-enabled smart waste management in supply chain operations: a circular economy perspective in China”, Production Planning and Control, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.198090CrossRefGoogle Scholar