Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:05:34.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FIND THE GAP: AN APPROACH FOR VISUALIZING AND ANALYSING DESIGN COMPETENCIES IN A UNIVERSITY WITH INTERDISCIPLINARY CURRICULUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Sumbul Khan ,
Immanuel Hendra ,
Shravya Thandlam Sudhindra ,
Nur Liyana Binte Abdul Muthalib  and
Lucienne Blessing
Sumbul Khan*
Affiliation:
Singapore University of Technology and Design
Immanuel Hendra
Affiliation:
Singapore University of Technology and Design
Shravya Thandlam Sudhindra
Affiliation:
Singapore University of Technology and Design
Nur Liyana Binte Abdul Muthalib
Affiliation:
Singapore University of Technology and Design
Lucienne Blessing
Affiliation:
Singapore University of Technology and Design
*
Khan, Sumbul, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Design education needs to be continually investigated and improved to stay relevant. The Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) is a leading university focused on all elements of technology-based design. The overarching motivation of our research is to enhance design education curriculum at SUTD. Our research objectives are (1) to understand how design competencies are implemented in SUTD's curriculum and courses (2) to identify gaps in teaching of design competencies at SUTD. We analyse competencies in 28 design courses at SUTD. We develop the visualization and analysis of 12 skills grouped under two abilities from the Design competency assessment framework. Our main contributions are: (1) We present an approach to map the design competencies that are taught across design courses at a university with an interdisciplinary curriculum, (2) We present an approach for mapping design competency progression based on ITAE (Introduced, Taught, Assessed, Expected) categorization, (3) Based on the above, we provide preliminary findings on two skill gaps in the curriculum, substantiated with insights from interviews with course coordinators.

Keywords

Design educationDesign processDesign learningEducation
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 1885 - 1894
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Andrews, J., Knowles, G. and Clark, R. (2019), Excellence in Engineering Education for the 21st Century: The Role of Engineering Education Research, Full proceedings of UK and Ireland Engineering Education Research Network Annual Conference 2019, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
Annetta, L.A., Lamb, R., Vallett, D. and Shapiro, M. (2018), “Project-based learning progressions: Identifying the nodes of learning in a project-based environment”, In: Adesope, O. O., Rud, A. G. (Eds), Contemporary Technologies in Education: Maximizing Student Engagement, Motivation, And Learning, Palgrave Macmillan Cham, College of Education, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA, pp. 163–181. https://10.1007/978-3-319-89680-9_9.Google Scholar
Barnhart, T. and van Es, E. (2015), “Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers’ ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking”, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 45, pp. 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Koh, J., Royalty, A. and Hornstein, M. (2010), “Destination, imagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom”, International Journal of Art and Design Education, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, K.S., Hjorth, M., Iversen, O.S. and Smith, R.C. (2019), “Understanding design literacy in middle-school education: assessing students’ stances towards inquiry”, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9459-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, Edström, Gunnarsson, D.R., , K. S. and Gustafsson, G. (2014), “Integrated Curriculum Design”, In: Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D.R. (Eds.), Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach, Second Edition, Springer International Publishing, New York, pp. 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dooren, E., Boshuizen, E., Van Merriënboer, J., Asselbergs, T. and Van Dorst, M. (2014), “Making explicit in design education: Generic elements in the design process”, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Vol. 24, pp. 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9246-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
English, L.D. (2018), “Learning while designing in a fourth-grade integrated STEM problem”, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Springer Netherlands, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 1011–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9482-z.Google Scholar
Fass, J., Rutgers, J. and Chui, M.-L. (2018), “Using Design Competencies to Define Curricula and Support Learners”, In Storni, C., Leahy, K., McMahon, M., Lloyd, P. and Bohemia, E. (Eds.), Design as a catalyst for change - DRS International Conference 2018, 25-28 June, Limerick, Ireland. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.578.Google Scholar
Getha-Taylor, H., Hummert, R., Nalbandian, J. and Silvia, C. (2013), “Competency Model Design and Assessment: Findings and Future Directions”, Journal of Public Affairs Education, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 141–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2013.12001724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, R. (2018), The Global State of the Art in Engineering Education. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Report, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
Heritage, M. (2008). Learning Progressions: Supporting Instruction and Formative Assessment, University of California, LA: National Center For Research On Evaluation, Standards, And Student Testing (CRESST).Google Scholar
Huizinga, T., Handelzalts, A., Nieveen, N. and Voogt, J.M. (2014), “Teacher involvement in curriculum design: Need for support to enhance teachers’ design expertise”, Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol. 46 No. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, S.M. and Soares, L. (2014), “Principles for Developing Competency-Based Education Programs”, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, Informa UK Limited, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 12–19.Google Scholar
Jovanovic, V. and Tomovic, M. (2008), “A competency gap in the comprehensive design education”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--3430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. and Care, E. (2018), Learning progressions: Pathways for 21st century teaching and learning. [online] Brookings. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/education-plus-development/2018/03/27/learning-progressions-pathways-for-21st-century-teaching-and-learning/ (3rd April 2023).Google Scholar
Meyer, M.W. and Norman, D. (2020), “Changing Design Education for the 21st Century”, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, Elsevier, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 13–49.Google Scholar
Nae, H.J. (2017), “An Interdisciplinary Design Education Framework”, The Design Journal, Vol. 20 No. sup1, pp. S835–S847. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1353030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, B., Tucker, B., Jones, S. and Ferns, S. (2007), “Are our students work-ready? Graduate and employer feedback for comprehensive course review”, A Conference for University Teachers, University of Western Australia, January 2007.Google Scholar
Petrović, J. and Pale, P., 2021. Achieving scalability and interactivity in a communication skills course for undergraduate engineering students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 64(4), pp.413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plummer, J.D. and Maynard, L. (2014), “Building a learning progression for celestial motion: An exploration of students’ reasoning about the seasons”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 51 No. 7, pp. 902–929. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quam, A. (2019), “Surveying Stakeholders: Research Informing Design Curriculum”, IASDR 2017 Conference, University of Cincinnati - College of Design Architecture Art, and Planning (DAAP), 2017, University of Cincinnati. https://doi.org/10.7945/C2H10C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SkillsFuture Sg. (2019), Skills Framework for Design, Singapore. Available at: https://www.skillsfuture.gov.sg/skills-framework/design.Google Scholar
SUTD Vision (2011), SUTD Mission and Vision. Available at: https://www.sutd.edu.sg/About/Overview/Mission-and-Values.Google Scholar
Thandlam Sudhindra, S. and Blessing, T.M.L. (2021), “A framework for Design Competency Assessment”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 1, pp. 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thandlam Sudhindra, S., He, Y., Blessing, L., & Ahmad Khan, S. (2022), “Stories of Design Education: An Analysis of Practices and Competencies”, Proceedings of the Design Society, May 2022, Cambridge University Press, pp. 2403–2412. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, N., Wrigley, C. (2019), “Broadening design-led education horizons: conceptual insights and future research directions.”, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9429-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar