Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:13:11.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EXTENDING PRODUCT FAMILY DESIGN METHODS TO PRODUCT-SERVICE-SYSTEM FAMILY DESIGN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

David Rosen  and
Young Mi Choi
David Rosen*
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology Singapore University of Technology and Design
Young Mi Choi
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology
*
Rosen, David, Georgia Institute of Technology, Mechanical Engineering, United States of America, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although product family design methods are well established, little research has focused on Product-Service-System (PSS) family design. A PSS family design method is proposed in this paper that parallels methodology for designing product families. Separate platforms are proposed for products and for services. However, couplings between product and service platforms are identified and incorporated into the design method. Design problem formulations are proposed for PSS family platforms and for the PSS family itself, using a module-based approach, in contrast to a platform scaling approach. Alternative methods are investigated and compared for solving these problems. The application domain of Assistive Mobility (AM) is identified as a promising PSS family in this work. If smart technologies are integrated into AM devices, such as manual wheelchairs, powered wheelchairs, walkers, and rollators, then patient diagnosis and treatment, as well as device maintenance, services are enabled with these smart technologies, demonstrating that smart AM devices are a promising PSS family.

Keywords

Product-Service Systems (PSS)Product architectureDesign methodologyProduct-Service-System Family DesignAssistive Mobility
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 1557 - 1566
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Borjesson, F. and Holtta-Otto, K. (2013). “A module generation algorithm for product architecture based on component interactions and strategic drivers.” Research in Engineering Design, 25(164): 21.Google Scholar
Cenamor, J., Ronnberg Sjodin, D., and Parida, V. (2017) “Adopting a platform approach in servitization: Leveraging the value of digitalization,” Int. J. Production Economics, 192: 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhury, S., Messac, A., and Khire, R.A., (2011) “Comprehensive Product Platform Planning (CP3) Framework,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 133(10), 101004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, A.M. and Polgar, J.M. (2008). Assistive Technologies: Principles and practice (3rd ed.). St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cowan, D. and Turner-Smith, A., (1999) “The Role of Assistive Technology in Alternative Models of Care for Older People,” in With Respect to Old Age - Research Volume 2. 1999.Google Scholar
de Domingo, K. (2013) “Assistive technologies for cognition: Perspectives on funding,” Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, 22(2): 84–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eissens-van der Laan, M., Broekhuis, M., van Offenbeek, M., and Ahaus, K. (2016) “Service decomposition: a conceptual analysis of modularizing services,” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., 36(3):308–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fargnoli, M., Haber, N., and Sakao, T. (2019) PSS Modularization – A Customer Driven Integrated Approach, International Journal of Production Research, 57(13): 4061–4077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershenson, J. K., Prasad, G. J., and Zhang, Y. (2003) “Product Modularity: Measures and Design Methods,” J. Engineering Design, 15(1), pp. 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haber, N. and Fargnoli, M. (2017) “Design for Product-Service Systems: A Procedure to Enhance Functional Integration of Product-Service Offerings.” International Journal of Product Development, 22(2): 135–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J-T. and Rosen, D.W. (2019) “A Product Family Design Method for Configuration and Spatial Layout Requirements,” J. Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 19: 031006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hara, T., Arai, T., and Shimomura, Y. (2009), “A CAD system for service innovation: integrated representation of function, service activity, and product behavior,” Journal of Engineering Design, 20:4, 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, Public Law 101-476, https://sites.ed.gov/idea/.Google Scholar
Kairalla, J.A., Winkler, S.L., and Feng, H. (2016) “Understanding the Provision of Assistive Mobility and Daily Living Devices and Service Delivery to Veterans After Stroke,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70, 7001290020. Dicianno, B.E., Joseph, J., Eckstein, S., Zigler, C.K., Quinby,CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kusiak, A., Smith, M.R., and Song, Z. (2007) “Planning product configurations based on sales data,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Part C, 37(4), 602–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lei, N., Yao, X., Moon, S.K., and Bi, G. (2016) “An additive manufacturing process model for product family design,” J. Engineering Design, 27(11): 751–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, M. V. and Ishii, K. (2002). “Design for Variety: Developing Standardized and Modularized Product Platform Architecture.” Research in Engineering Design, 13(4): 213–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maussang, N., Zwolinski, P., and Brissaud, D. (2009), “Product-service system design methodology: from the PSS architecture design to the products specifications,” Journal of Engineering Design, 20(4), 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, S.K., Shu, J., Simpson, T.W., and Kumara, S.R. (2011) “A module-based service model for mass customization: service family design,” IIE Transactions, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcomb, P.J., Bras, B.A., and Rosen, D.W. (1998) “Implications of Modularity on Product Design for the Life Cycle,” ASME J. of Mechanical Design. Vol. 120, No. 3, pp. 483–490, September.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otto, K., Holtta-Otto, K., Simpson, T.W., Krause, D., Ripperda, S., and Moon, S.K. (2016) “Global Views on Modular Design Research: Linking Alternative Methods to Support Modular Product Family Concept Development,” ASME J. Mechanical Design, 138: 071101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reim, W., Parida, V., and Örtqvist, D., (2015), “Product–Service Systems (PSS) business models and tactics–a systematic literature review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, D.W., Na Ayutthaya, D.H., and Koomsap, P. (2017) “Additive and digital manufacturing design tools: an application of product-service system design,” Asia-Design Engineering Workshop, Seoul, South Korea, Dec. 11-12.Google Scholar
Sakao, T, Hara, T, Fukushima, R (2020) “Using Product/Service-System Family Design for Efficient Customization with Lean Principles: Model, Method, and Tool,” Sustainability, 12, 5779. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12145779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmeler, E.J., Schein, M.R., Pearlman, R.M., , J., and Cooper, R.A. (2019) “The future of the provision process for mobility assistive technology: a survey of providers,” Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 14:4, 338–345.Google Scholar
Simpson, T.W., Bobuk, A., Slingerland, L.A., Brennan, S., Logan, D., and Reichard, K. (2012). “From user requirements to commonality specifications: an integrated approach to product family design.” Research in Engineering Design, 23(119): 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, R. B., Wood, K. L., and Crawford, R. H. (2000). “A Heuristic Method for Identifying Modules for Product Architectures.” Design Studies, 21(1): 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, A., McAloone, T. C., & Gall, C., (2007), “Product/Service-System development: an explorative case study in a manufacturing company”, In 16th International Conference on Engineering Design. Design Society.Google Scholar
Thevenot, H. J. and Simpson, T. W. (2006). “Commonality Indices for Product Family Design: A Detailed Comparison.” Journal of Engineering Design 17(2): 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of Commerce (2003) Technology Assessment of the US Assistive Technology Industry. Available from: https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/technology-evaluation/60-technology-assessment-u-s-assistive-technology-industry-2003.Google Scholar
Vasantha, G.V.A., Roy, R., Lelah, A., and Brissaud, D. (2012), “A review of product–service systems design methodologies”, Journal of Engineering Design, 23(9), 635–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voss, C.A. and Hsuan, J. (2009) “Service Architecture and Modularity,” Decision Sciences, 40(3):541–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westkämper, E., Alting, L., and Arndt, G. (2001), “Life cycle management and assessment: approaches and visions towards sustainable manufacturing (keynote paper)”, Proc. Inst. Mech Engr Part B, 215(5):599–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar