Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T20:16:02.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimenting in Industrial Product Design. The Case: "Art, Design and Business Project for New Young Talents - Young Culture as a Motor for a New Business Economy in Tuscany”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

P. Pupparo ,
M. Tufarelli  and
M. C. Coppola
P. Pupparo*
Affiliation:
University of Florence, Italy
M. Tufarelli
Affiliation:
University of Florence, Italy
M. C. Coppola
Affiliation:
University of Florence, Italy
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The design of mass-produced products is a design process aimed at the masses, which describes approaches and phenomena in strong transformation. The production techniques, the semantic value of the products, the concept of mass production and the similarities between these factors explain new production and design balances following the latest technological and cultural transformations within contemporary society and the market. The paper discusses and investigates the theme of industrial design aimed at the masses, reporting relevant case studies and experimental tests.

Keywords

additive manufacturingproduction designmass customisationindustrial designindustry 4.0
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 2175 - 2182
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., & Lema, M. D. (2021). New development: COVID-19 as an accelerator of digital transformation in public service delivery. Public Money & Management, 41(1), 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amadori, K., Tarkian, M., Ölvander, J., & Krus, P. (2012). Flexible and robust CAD models for design automation. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(2), 180–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertola, P. and Manzini, E. (2004), “Il design del prodotto” (a cura di), Design Multiverso. Appunti di una fenomenologia del design, Edizioni Poli.Design, Milano 2004, p. 243.Google Scholar
Branzi, A. , Genovese, E., Susani, M. Trimarchi, M. and Tagliabue, R. (1998) Il new Industrial design, Domus No. 807Google Scholar
Carlei, V., Nuccio, M., Sacco, P., Buscema, M. (2008). La complessità strutturale dei distretti industriali: un approccio basato sulle similarità multi-dimensionali. Scienze Regionali--Italian Journal of Regional Science. 7. 55–86.Google Scholar
Caruso, I., Cristallo, V., & Martino, C. (2019, July). Inclusive Design Practices for Natural Parks. Products and Services for Experience-Focused Solutions in Places of High Naturalistic Value. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 251–262). Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
Celi, M, and Celaschi, F, (2010), “Riflessioni e corridoi di ricerca per l'AdvanceDesign”, In: AdvanceDesign - Visioni, percorsi e strumenti per predisporsi all'innovazione continua, MC Graw-Hill, 2010, pp. 165–171Google Scholar
Falcinelli, R. (2014) La benzina della creatività non è il talento ma la conoscenza. TEDxArezzo [online]. Available at: https://www.ted.comGoogle Scholar
Frateili, E (1989), “Continuità e trasformazione. Una storia del disegno industriale italiano 1928-1988”. Greco Alberto EditoreGoogle Scholar
Grassi, A., & Pansera, A. (1986), –L'Italia del design: trent'anni di dibattito”. Marietti. pp. 23–24Google Scholar
Kuys, B., Thong, C., Kotlarewski, N., & Thompson-Whiteside, S. (2014). Research-led practice in design research used to best demonstrate design theories. In Design Research Society Conference, pp. 16–19.Google Scholar
Levandowski, C.E., Jiao, J.R. and Johannesson, H. (2015), “A two-stage model of adaptable product platform for engineering-to-order configuration design”, Journal of Engineering Design.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorimer, B. (2021), MSCHF sells off 1000 copies of Andy Warhol's ‘Fairies’. Available at: https://www.art-critique.com/en/2021/11/mschf-sells-off-1000-copies-of-andy-warhols-fairies/Google Scholar
Maldonado, T. (1981) La speranza progettuale: Ambiente e società. G. Einaudi.Google Scholar
Maldonado, T (1961) Congresso Icsid, International council of societies of industrial design, Venezia.Google Scholar
Manzini, E. (2015), “Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation.” MIT press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stevens, J. (2019) “Post-Digital Craft" MD Journal, pp. 82–91.Google Scholar
Verganti, R. (2018). Overcrowded: designing meaningful products in a world awash with ideas. Overcrowded: Designing Meaningful Products in a World Awash with Ideas, 48-48.Google Scholar