Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:11:32.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EXPANDING USER NEED FINDING THROUGH ABDUCTIVE REASONING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Ryan Bruggeman*
Affiliation:
Northeastern University
Estefania Ciliotta Chehade
Affiliation:
Northeastern University
Paolo Ciuccarelli
Affiliation:
Northeastern University
*
Bruggeman, Ryan, Northeastern University, United States of Americ, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Prior research has shown the importance of latent user needs for enabling innovation in early product development phases. The success of a product is largely dependent on to what extent the product satisfies customer needs, and latent user needs play a significant role in impacting the way the product or service unexpectedly delights the user. Complications arise because traditional need finding methods are not able to account for the nuances of latent user needs. A user's need is multidimensional while traditional methods are built on deductive reasoning. The traditional method isolates parts of the user's needs, only pointing to what is deducible within its search space. To address this, we introduce abduction as a way to broaden traditional need finding methods. From a logic based argument it is shown that abduction accounts for the dimensionality of user needs by integrating various traditional need finding theories using design knowledge to isolate the latent need. This theoretical development shows that latent need finding must go beyond a deductive focus, to developing methods that are able to conjecture with the deduced facts in order to abduce the latent user need.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Andersen, S. (1983), “Need assessment: A way of improving the value of new products”, Design Studies, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 183187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694x(83)90028-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlgren, L. (2013), “Identifying latent needs: Towards a competence perspective on attractive quality creation”, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, Vol. 24 No. 11-12, pp. 13471363. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.776762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer-Petersen, C. L., Christensen, B. T., & Ahmed-Kristensen, S. (2019), “Empirically analysing design reasoning patterns: Abductive-deductive reasoning patterns dominate design idea generation”, Design Studies, vol. 60, pp. 3970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmet, P., & Fokkinga, S. (2020), “Beyond maslow's pyramid: Introducing a typology of thirteen fundamental needs for human-centered design”, Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, Vol. 4 No. 3, 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, R., & Hooker, C. (2013), “Design, science and wicked problems”, Design Studies, Vol. 34 No. 6, pp. 681705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1993), “The voice of the customer”, Marketing Science, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 127. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.12.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guenther, A., Eisenbart, B., & Dong, A. (2017), “Creativity as a way to innovate successfully”, DS 87-8 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 8: Human Behaviour in Design, Vancouver, Canada, 21-25.08.2017, pp. 389398.Google Scholar
Harker, S. D. P., & Eason, K. D. (1984), “Representing the user in the design process”, Design Studies, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 7985. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694x(84)90040-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasdoǧan, G. (1996), “The role of user models in product design for assessment of User Needs”, Design Studies, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 1933. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694x(95)00007-eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölttä-Otto, K., & Raviselvam, S. (2016), “Guidelines for finding Lead user like behaviour for latent need discovery”, DS 85-2: Proceedings of NordDesign 2016, Trondheim, Norway, 10th-12th August 2016, 2, pp. 339348.Google Scholar
Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F. & Tsuji, S. (1984), “Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality”, Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 3948.Google Scholar
Kolko, J. (2010), “Abductive thinking and sensemaking: The drivers of design synthesis”, Design Issues, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 1528. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2010.26.1.15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskela, L., Paavola, S., & Kroll, E. (2018), “The role of abduction in production of new ideas in Design”, In: Vermaas, P.E. & Vial, S. (Eds.), Advancements in the Philosophy of Design, Springer, Cham, Chapter 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_8Google Scholar
Lin, J., & Seepersad, C. C. (2007), “Empathic lead users: The effects of extraordinary user experiences on customer needs analysis and product redesign”, Volume 3: 19th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology; 1st International Conference on Micro- and Nanosystems; and 9th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Tire Technologies, Parts A and B. https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2007-35302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, S. C. -Y., & Liu, A. (2012), “Abductive reasoning for design synthesis”, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 61, pp. 143146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, L. (1976), “The logic of design and the question of value”, In: March, L. (Ed.), The architecture of form, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 140.Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.), “Latent”, In: Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved November 1, 2022, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/latentGoogle Scholar
Patnaik, D., & Becker, R. (2010), “Needfinding: The why and how of uncovering people's needs”, Design Management Journal, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 3743. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.1999.tb00250.xGoogle Scholar
Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005), “Three abductive solutions to the Meno paradox – with instinct, Inference, and distributed cognition”, Studies in Philosophy and Education, Vol. 24 No. 3-4, pp. 235253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-005-3846-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. S. [CP]. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, edited by Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P., and Burks, A., 19311958, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rasoulifar, G., Eckert, C., & Prudhomme, G. (2015), “Communicating consumer needs in the design process of branded products”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 137 No. 7. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salminen, J., Jung, S.-G., & Jansen, B. J. (2021), “Manual and automatic methods for user needs detection in requirements engineering: Key Concepts and challenges”, 2021 International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME). https://doi.org/10.1109/iceccme52200.2021.9591046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffhausen, C. R., & Kowalewski, T. M. (2016), “Assessing quality of unmet user needs: Effects of need statement characteristics”, Design Studies, Vol. 44, pp. 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schon, D. A., & Wiggins, G. (1992), “Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing”, Design Studies, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 135156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694x(92)90268-fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1998), “Customer-led and market-oriented: Let's not confuse the two”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19 No. 10, pp. 10011006. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199810)19:10<1001::aid-smj996>3.0.co;2-43.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takeda, H., Yoshioka, M., & Tomiyama, T. (2001), “A general framework for modeling of synthesis–integration of theories of synthesis”, In 13th International conference on engineering design–ICED, Vol. 1, pp. 307314.Google Scholar
Thoring, K., Mueller, R. M., Desmet, P., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2022), “Toward a unified model of design knowledge”, Design Issues, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 1732. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomiyama, T., Takeda, H., Yoshioka, M., & Shimomura, Y. (2003), “Abduction for creative design”, Volume 3b: 15th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2003/dtm-48650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuarob, S., & Tucker, C. S. (2015), “Automated discovery of lead users and latent product features by mining large scale social media networks”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 137 No. 7. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulwick, A. W. (2009), What customers want: Using outcome-driven innovation to create breakthrough products and services. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
von Hippel, E. (1986), “Lead users: A source of novel product concepts”, Management Science, Vol. 32 No. 7, pp. 791805. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, F., Qu, X., Jiao, J., & Helander, M. G. (2013), “Emotion prediction from physiological signals: A comparison study between visual and auditory elicitors”, Interacting with Computers, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 285302. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwt039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, F., Jianxin Jiao, R., & Linsey, J. S. (2015), “Latent customer needs elicitation by use case analogical reasoning from sentiment analysis of online product reviews”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 137 No. 7. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030159CrossRefGoogle Scholar