Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:10:55.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EXAMINING THE ROLE AND FUTURE POTENTIAL OF DESIGN FOR DISASSEMBLY METHODS TO SUPPORT CIRCULAR PRODUCT DESIGN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Giovanni Formentini  and
Devarajan Ramanujan
Giovanni Formentini*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering – Design and Manufacturing, Aarhus University, Katrinebjergvej 89 G-F, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
Devarajan Ramanujan
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering – Design and Manufacturing, Aarhus University, Katrinebjergvej 89 G-F, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark Centre for Digitalisation, Big Data and Data Analytics, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8200, Denmark
*
Formentini, Giovanni, Aarhus University, Denmark, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Design for disassembly (DfD) approaches are crucial in supporting the industrial circular economy transition. In literature, a great amount of DfD methodologies is available, however, it is still not clear how they can be used to improve product circularity. To address this gap, our work proposed a systematic literature review of DfD methodologies applied in the field of product design with the aim to provide an overview of the topic in the last decade (i.e., from 2012 to 2022) in terms of methods applicability (i.e., design phase), required parameters and integration capability with circularity assessment. As a result, the paper shows that DfD methods are mainly used in the later design phase to improve product sustainability performances, but a method that simultaneously considers DfD and CE is currently missing. Based on the obtained results, we outlined the requirements that a new DfX method would need to consider both DfD and CE simultaneously. Finally, we proposed a modified version of the butterfly diagram in which DfD parameters are linked to CE indicators to help visualize the connection between the two areas.

Keywords

Design for DisassemblyCircular economyProduct DesignDesign for X (DfX)Design methodology
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 1735 - 1744
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Behdad, S., Berg, L.P., Thurston, D. and Vance, J.M. (2013). Synergy Between Normative and Descriptive Design Theory and Methodology. Volume 5: 25th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology; ASME 2013 Power Transmission and Gearing Conference. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2013-13035.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Z., Ramanujan, W, Devanathan, D, Zhao, S, Ramani, F, K & Sutherland, JW 2010, Development of a Framework for Sustainable Conceptual Design. in 17th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering. Hefei, China, 19/05/2010.Google Scholar
Bocken, N.M.P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C. and van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product Design and Business Model Strategies for a Circular Economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), pp. 308–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission, European (2020). Circular economy action plan. [online] environment.ec.europa.eu. Available at: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/circular-economy-action-plan_en.Google Scholar
Cong, L., Zhao, F. and Sutherland, J. (2019). A Design Method to Improve End-of-Use Product Value Recovery for Circular Economy. Journal of Mechanical Design.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagman, A. and Söderberg, R. (2012). Toward a Method for Improving Product Architecture Solutions by Integrating Designs for Assembly, Disassembly and Maintenance. Volume 3: Design, Materials and Manufacturing, Parts A, B, and C. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2012-87466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fazio, F., Bakker, C., Flipsen, B. and Balkenende, R. (2021). The Disassembly Map: A new method to enhance design for product repairability. Journal of Cleaner Production, [online] 320, p. 128552. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Hollander, M.C., Bakker, C.A. and Hultink, E.J. (2017). Product Design in a Circular Economy: Development of a Typology of Key Concepts and Terms. Journal of Industrial Ecology, [online] 21(3), pp. 517–525. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desari, A., and Mital, A. (2003). A Design For Disassembly Algorithm Based on Quantitative Analysis of Design Parameters Affecting Disassemblability. The International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications and Practice 10(3):256–270.Google Scholar
Dias, Rodrigues, Jugend, V.M., de Camargo Fiorini, D., Razzino, P., do A, C.. and Paula Pinheiro, M.A. (2022). Possibilities for applying the circular economy in the aerospace industry: Practices, opportunities and challenges. Journal of Air Transport Management, 102, p. 102227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terra dos Santos, L.C., Giannetti, B.F., Agostinho, F. and Almeida, C.M.V.B. (2022). Using the five sectors sustainability model to verify the relationship between circularity and sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 366, p. 132890. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favi, C., Germani, M., Mandolini, M. and Marconi, M. (2012). Promoting and Managing End-of-Life Closed-Loop Scenarios of Products Using a Design for Disassembly Evaluation Tool. Volume 3: 38th Design Automation Conference, Parts A and B. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2012-70997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flipsen, B., Bakker, C.A. and de Pauw, I.C. (2020). Hotspot Mapping for product disassembly: A circular product assessment method. Electronics Goes Green 2020+ (EGG).Google Scholar
Formentini, G., Boix Rodríguez, N. and Favi, C. (2022). Design for manufacturing and assembly methods in the product development process of mechanical products: a systematic literature review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08837-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foundation, Ellen MacArthur (2017). Let's Build a Circular Economy. [online] ellenmacarthurfoundation.org. Available at: https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/.Google Scholar
Foundation, Ellen MacArthur (2020). What is a Circular Economy? A Framework for an Economy that is Restorative and Regenerative by Design.Google Scholar
Giurco, D., Littleboy, A., Boyle, T., Fyfe, J. and White, S. (2014). Circular Economy: Questions for Responsible Minerals, Additive Manufacturing and Recycling of Metals. Resources, 3(2), pp. 432–453. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/resources3020432.Google Scholar
Hapuwatte, B.M., Seevers, K.D. and Jawahir, I.S. (2022). Metrics-based dynamic product sustainability performance evaluation for advancing the circular economy. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 64, pp. 275–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.06.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Y., Srinivasan, R., Spoll, J. and Ameta, G. (2015). Graph Based Method and Tool for Complete and Selective Disassembly Time Estimation in Early Design. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 15(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J.L. (2013). Optimized Product Design Methodology: A Combinatorial Reverse Logistic Cost-Benefit Analysis Model of WEEPs. Advanced Materials Research, 650, pp. 692–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Igarashi, K., Yamada, T., Gupta, S.M., Inoue, M. and Itsubo, N. (2016). Disassembly system modeling and design with parts selection for cost, recycling and CO2 saving rates using multi criteria optimization. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 38, pp. 151–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.11.002.Google Scholar
Jabbour, C.J.C., Jabbour, A.B.L. de, S., Sarkis, J. and Filho, M.G. (2019). Unlocking the circular economy through new business models based on large-scale data: An integrative framework and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, pp. 546–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeandin, T. and Mascle, C. (2016). A New Model to Select Fasteners in Design for Disassembly. Procedia CIRP, 40, pp. 425–430. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerome, A., Helander, H., Ljunggren, M. and Janssen, M. (2022). Mapping and testing circular economy product-level indicators: A critical review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 178, p. 106080. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. and Moon, S.K. (2020). A Part Consolidation Design Method for Additive Manufacturing based on Product Disassembly Complexity. Applied Sciences, 10(3), p. 1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S., Moon, S.K., Jeon, S.M. and Oh, H.S. (2016). A disassmbly complexity assessment method for sustainable product design. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ieem.2016.7798121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, A.J.D. (2003). Disassembly sequencing: A survey. International Journal of Production Research, 41(16), pp. 3721–3759. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0020754031000120078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z. and Wang, S. (2022). A State-of-the-Art Review for Product Engineering Design for Sustainability Focusing on Aims and Methodologies. Advances in Mechanical Design, pp. 1027–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesa, J., Esparragoza, I. and Maury, H. (2018). Developing a set of sustainability indicators for product families based on the circular economy model. Journal of Cleaner Production, [online] 196, pp. 1429–1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prioli, J.P.J., Alrufaifi, H.M. and Rickli, J.L. (2022). Disassembly assessment from CAD-based collision evaluation for sequence planning. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 78, p. 102416.Google Scholar
Rossi, M., Cappelletti, F., Marconi, M. and Germani, M. (2021). A Design for De-manufacturing Methodology to Improve the Product End of Life Environmental Sustainability. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, pp. 373–380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91234-5_38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabaghi, M., Mascle, C. and Baptiste, P. (2016). Evaluation of products at design phase for an efficient disassembly at end-of-life. Journal of Cleaner Production, 116, pp. 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shetty, D. and Xu, J. (2017). Design for Disassembly Method As Sustainable Product Evaluation Tool: Example of Underground Escalator. Volume 11: Systems, Design, and Complexity.Google Scholar
Smith, S. and Hung, P.-Y. (2015). A novel selective parallel disassembly planning method for green design. Journal of Engineering Design, 26(10-12), pp. 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soh, S.L., Ong, S.K. and Nee, A.Y.C. (2014). Design for Disassembly for Remanufacturing: Methodology and Technology. Procedia CIRP, 15, pp. 407–412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umeda, Y., Miyaji, N., Shiraishi, Y. and Fukushige, S. (2015). Proposal of a design method for semi-destructive disassembly with split lines. CIRP Annals, 64(1), pp. 29–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2015.04.045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanegas, P., Peeters, J.R., Cattrysse, D., Tecchio, P., Ardente, F., Mathieux, F., Dewulf, W. and Duflou, J.R. (2018). Ease of disassembly of products to support circular economy strategies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, [online] 135(135), pp. 323–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.06.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanegas, P., JPeeters, J.R., Duflou, J.R., Mathieux, F., Ardente, F., Tecchio, P. and Cattrysse, D. (2016). Study for a method to assess the ease of disassembly of electrical and electronic equipment: method development and application to a flat panel display case study. [online] Publications Office of the European Union. LU: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Wang, J.X., Burke, H. and Zhang, A. (2022). Overcoming barriers to circular product design. International Journal of Production Economics, 243, p. 108346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jukun, Y., Peizhi, C., Xiaoming, W. and Xiaojun, S. (2014). Product Material Design Assessment Methods for Remanufacturing. 2014 Sixth International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/icmtma.2014.113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zandin, K.B. and Schmidt, T.M. (2020). MOST® Work Measurement Systems. CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Feng, Y., Tan, J., Jia, W. and Yi, G. (2015). A novel approach for parallel disassembly design based on a hybrid fuzzy-time model. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 16(9), pp. 724–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, Y., Zhou, X., Liu, C. and D, XU. (2020). Design for disassembly, toward a life-cycle design method for bridge engineering. CRC Press.Google Scholar