Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:09:05.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Emotional design of medical devices: exoskeletons and post-stroke recovery devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Frederik Kiersgaard Lund*
Affiliation:
Aalborg University, Denmark
Luke Edward Eric Feast
Affiliation:
Aalborg University, Denmark
Milo Marsfeldt Skovfoged
Affiliation:
Aalborg University, Denmark
Hendrik Knoche
Affiliation:
Aalborg University, Denmark
Mostafa Mohammadi
Affiliation:
Aalborg University, Denmark
Lotte N. S. Andreasen Struijk
Affiliation:
Aalborg University, Denmark
Linda Nhu Laursen
Affiliation:
Aalborg University, Denmark

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The paper explores the integration of emotional design elements in the development of medical devices to enhance user acceptance and adherence. It emphasizes the importance of a user-centered approach, acknowledging both functional and emotional needs. The study compares two cases within healthcare design, highlighting the impact of emotional design on users' perception of medical devices. Despite the different stages of development in the two cases, both employed a higher level of refflective design, aiming to create a lasting impact on users' identity using the products.

Type
Design for Healthcare
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Alsaawi, A. (2014). A critical review of qualitative interviews. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 4 , July 2014. pp. 149 - 156 Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2819536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2006). Gathering Rich Data. In Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE publication Ltd. pp. 25-35. ISBN-10 0-7619-7352-4.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. L., Ko, K. H. K., Lahoud, D. N., Erez, S. K., Wrigley, C. (2019). Exploring the role of design in the context of medical device innovation. In Almendra, R.A. (Ed.) Proceedings of the Academy for Design Innovation Management Conference 2019. Academy for Design Innovation Management, United Kingdom, pp. 1-19.Google Scholar
Gloyd, D. M. (2003). Positive User Experience and Medical Adherence. DPPI '03: Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on Designing pleasurable products, and interfaces June 2003 Pages 1721 https://doi.org/10.1145/782896.782902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobbelgaard, F. V., Kanstrup, A. M., & Struijk, L. N. S. A. (2021). Exploring User Requirements for an Exoskeleton Arm Insights from a User-Centered Study with People Living with Severe Paralysis. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 12932 LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85623-6_19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koen, P. A. et al., (2002). 'Fuzzy Front End: Effective Methods, Tools, and Techniques, in Belliveau, P. et al. (ed.) The PDMA Toolbook for new product development. John Wiley & Sons Inc, pp. 6-8Google Scholar
Laursen, L. N., & Tollestrup, C. (2017). Design thinking-a paradigm. In DS 87-2 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 2: Design Processes, Design Organisation and Management, Vancouver, Canada, 21-25.08. 2017 (pp. 229-238)Google Scholar
Laursen, L. N., & Tollestrup, C. (2015). The role of ambiguity and discrepancy in early phases of innovation. In DS 80-8 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15) Vol 8: Innovation and Creativity, Milan, Italy, 27-30.07. 15 (pp. 081-090).Google Scholar
Mitsuo, N. (2002). Kansei engineering as a powerful consumer-oriented technology for product development. Applied Ergonomics, Volume 33, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 289-294, ISSN 0003-6870, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00019-4.Google Scholar
Mitsuo, N. (1995). Kansei Engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Volume 15, Issue 1, 1995, Pages 3-11, ISSN 0169-8141, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(94)00052-5.Google Scholar
Norman, D. (2004). Emotional Design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books. ISBN-10: 0-465-05135-9Google Scholar
Norman, D. & Ortony, A. (2006). Designers and users: Two perspectives on emotion and design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, L.W., Power, V., de Eyto, A., Ortiz, J. (2017). User Centered Design and Usability of Bionic Devices. In: Ibáñez, J., González-Vargas, J., Azorín, J., Akay, M., Pons, J. (eds) Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation II. Biosystems & Biorobotics, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46669-9_96Google Scholar
Struijk, L. N. S. A., Kanstrup, A. M., Bai, S., Bak, T., Thogersen, M. B., Mohammadi, M., Bengtson, S. H., Kobbelgaard, F. V., Gull, M. A., Bentsen, B., Severinsen, K. E., Kasch, H., & Moeslund, T. B. (2022). The impact of interdisciplinarity and user involvement on the design and usability of an assistive upper limb exoskeleton - a case study on the EXOTIC. In 2022 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR 2022 (pp. 1-5). [9896500] IEEE. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR55369.2022.9896500Google ScholarPubMed
Thøgersen, M. B., Gull, M. A., Kobbelgaard, F. V., Mohammadi, M., Bengtson, S. H. and Struijk, L. N. S. A. (2020). EXOTIC - A Discreet User-Based 5 DoF Upper-Limb Exoskeleton for Individuals with Tetraplegia. 2020 3rd International Conference on Mechatronics, Robotics and Automation (ICMRA), Shanghai, China, 2020, pp. 79-83, https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICMRA51221.2020.9398351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thøgersen, M. B.; Mohammadi, M.; Gull, M. A., Bengtson, S. H., Kobbelgaard, F. V.; Bentsen, B., Khan, B. Y. A., Severinsen, K. E., Bai, S., Bak, T., et al. (2022) User Based Development and Test of the EXOTIC Exoskeleton: Empowering Individuals with Tetraplegia Using a Compact, Versatile, 5-DoF Upper Limb Exoskeleton Controlled through Intelligent Semi-Automated Shared Tongue Control. Sensors 2022, 22, 6919. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22186919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triberti, S., Chirico, A., , L. G. and , R. G. (2017) Developing Emotional Design: Emotions as Cognitive Processes and their Role in the Design of Interactive Technologies. Front. Psychol. 8:1773. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01773CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaes, K. (2019). Design for Empowerment, the Stigma-Free Design Toolkit. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 824. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_10Google Scholar
Yusa, I. M. M., Ardhana, I. K., Putra, I. N. D. and Pujaastawa, I. B. G. (2023) “EMOTIONAL DESIGN: A REVIEW OF THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS, METHODOLOGIES, AND APPLICATIONS”, Journal of Aesthetics, Design, and Art Management, 3(1), pp. 1-14. https://dx.doi.org/10.58982/jadam.v3i1.308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar