Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:42:34.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ELICITING CHILDREN'S EXPECTATIONS FOR HAND PROSTHESES THROUGH GENERATIVE DESIGN TOOLS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Melis Dursun  and
Bahar Şener Pedgley
Melis Dursun*
Affiliation:
Middle East Technical University
Bahar Şener Pedgley
Affiliation:
Middle East Technical University
*
Dursun, Melis, METU, Industrial Design, Turkey, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

When designing assistive devices for children with disabilities, designers mostly consider technical and functional aspects and overlook factors that affect their usage from children’s perspective. Therefore, in most cases, assistive devices do not fully meet the needs of the children and may create a negative effect on children’s well-being. To explore the opinion’s of children using 3D printed hand prosthetics in Country-Xx, individual generative sessions were conducted with four children with limb deficiency. Generative tools are used to engage children and encourage them to express themselves in relation to prosthesis use. The main aim was to investigate how children provide design relevant information that may help designers to achieve improved assistive devices that support children’s physical, emotional and social wellbeing. Children’s feedback related to prosthetic usage categorized under two topics; expectations of children for prosthesis use and children’s priority expectation for the prosthesis. The findings are argued to be useful and usable by NGOs, product designers and design researchers who work with children with disabilities.

Keywords

Participatory designInclusive designDesign methodsdesign with childrenprosthesis design
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 1343 - 1352
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Aucourt, J. et al. (2012) “Congenital malformations of the hand and forearm in children: What radiologists should know”, Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology, 16(2), pp. 146–158. https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1311766.Google ScholarPubMed
Baek, J.-S. and Lee, K.-P. (2008) “A participatory design approach to information architecture design for children”, CoDesign, 4(3), pp. 173–191. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15710880802281026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, J., and Weller, S. (2003) ‘“Is it Fun?” Developing Children Centred Research Methods’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 18(1), pp. 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330310790435.Google Scholar
Burger, H., Brezovar, D. and Marinček, Č. (2004) “Comparison of clinical test and questionnaires for the evaluation of upper limb prosthetic use in children”, Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(14-15), pp. 911–916. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280410001708931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ccorimanya, L., Watanabe, R., Hassan, M., Hada, Y., and Suzuki, K., (2019) “Design of a myoelectric 3D-printed prosthesis for a child with upper limb congenital amputation”, Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. pp. 5394–5398. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2019.8857899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, P., and James, A. (2008). “Research with children: Perspectives and practices.” Routledge. http://www.ufri.uniri.hr/files/%C4%8Dasopis/casopis_br_5.pdf#page=103Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2007). “A hundred ways of listening: Gathering children's perspectives of their early childhood environment.” YC Young Children, 62(3), 76.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. H., Jones, L. E., Cornet, J., and Cittarelli, T. (2002) “Management of the multiple limb amputee”, Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(13), pp. 688–699. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280110115384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Druin, A. (1999) “Cooperative inquiry: Developing new technologies for children with children”, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, pp. 592–599. https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/302979.303166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druin, A. (2002) “The role of children in the design of new technology, Behaviour & Infirmation Technology”, Behaviour & Information Technology, 21(1), pp. 1–25. http://legacydirs.umiacs.umd.edu/~allisond/child_info_tech/Druin-BIT-Paper2002.pdf.Google Scholar
e-NABLE, (2020). “Enabling The Future.” [online] Available at: <http://enablingthefuture.org/>..>Google Scholar
Frauenberger, C., Good, J. and Alcorn, A. (2012) “Challenges, opportunities and future perspectives in including children with disabilities in the design of interactive technology”, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 367–370. https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2307096.2307171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greig, A., Taylor, J. and MacKay, T. (2011) “Designing and Doing Research with Children: The Importance of Questions”, Doing Research with Children, pp. 78–97. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849209045.n5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glynn, M. K., Galway, H. R., Hunter, G., & Sauter, W. F. (1986). “Management of the upper-limb-deficient child with a powered prosthetic device.” Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (209), 202–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussain, S. and Sanders, E. B. N. (2012) “Fusion of horizons: Co-designing with Cambodian children who have prosthetic legs, using generative design tools”, CoDesign, 8(1), pp. 43–79. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.637113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, A. (1998) “Foreword”, in Hutchby, I. and Moran-Ellis, J. (eds) Children and Social Competence, pp. vii–x. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, V., Kellett, M., Robinson, C., Fraser, S., & Ding, S. (Eds.). (2004). “The reality of research with children and young people.” Sage.Google Scholar
Lukash, F. N. (2002) “Children's Art as a Helpful Index of Anxiety and Self-Esteem with Plastic Surgery”. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, pp. 1777–1786. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200205000-00001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauthner, M. (1997) “Methodological aspects of collecting data from children: Lessons from three research projects”, Children and Society, 11(1), pp. 16–28. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860. 1997.tb00003.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, C. D., and Fox, J. (2002). “Body image and prosthesis satisfaction in the lower limb amputee”. Disability and rehabilitation, 24(17), 925–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280210150014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Punch, S. (2002) “Research with children: The same or different from research with adults?”, Childhood, 9(3), pp. 321–341. 10.1177/0907568202009003045.Google Scholar
BibEntryOtherSanders, E. B.-N. (2001) “A New Design Space”, ICSID 2001 Seoul: Exploring Emerging Design Paradigm, Oullim. 7-11, pp. 317–324.Google Scholar
Sanders, E. B. N., Brandt, E., & Binder, T. (2010, November). “A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design.” In Proceedings of the 11th biennial participatory design conference pp. 195–198, https://doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, C. C. (1975). “Congenital deformities of the hand and forearm.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 56(4), 445–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruitt, S. D., Varni, J. W., Seid, M., & Setoguchi, Y. (1997). “Prosthesis satisfaction outcome measurement in pediatric limb deficiency”. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 78(7), 750–754, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90084-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, F.V., Hubbard, S., Jutai, S., and Naumann, S. (2001). ”Development and reliability testing of a new functional status questionnaire for children who use upper extremity prostheses”, Journal of Hand Therapy, Pages 91–104, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1130(01)80039-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar