Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:25:36.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Educational Probe for Developing Online Education: A Case of Online Problem-Based Learning in Design Education in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

Y. Hayama  and
H. Desai
Y. Hayama*
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano, Italy
H. Desai
Affiliation:
MIT Art, Design and Technology University, India
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The COVID-19 pandemic brought challenges and opportunities for higher education and one of the important areas was online education. Especially in design field, Online Problem-Based Learning has emerged as a promising method. This paper explores the potential of online-PBL and how it can be developed through a prototype approach. An action research in Indian HEI shows insights regarding the potentiality of online-PBL and application of a prototype approach to educational development activities. A concept of “educational probes” was proposed as a method to design educational program.

Keywords

design educationdigital learningdesign managementeducational probesonline problem-based learning
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 2283 - 2292
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Amundsen, C., and Wilson, M. (2012). “Are we asking the right questions?: A conceptual review of the educational development literature in higher education.” Review of Educational Research, 82 (1), 90–126. 10.3102/0034654312438409Google Scholar
Biggs, J., and Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. McGraw-hill education (UK).Google Scholar
Barron, B.J., Schwartz, D.L., Vye, N.J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., and Bransford, J.D. (1998). “Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning.” Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3–4), 271–311. 10.1080/10508406.1998.9672056Google Scholar
Brandon, B. (2004). “Applying instructional systems processes to constructivist learning environments.” The e-Learning Developers’ Journal. http://www.elearningguild.com/pdf/2/062904DES.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gill, A.S., Irwin, D.S., Ng, R.Y.K., Towey, D., Wang, T., and Zhang, Y. (2020, December). “The future of teaching post-COVID-19: Microlearning in product design education.” In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 780–785). IEEE. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TALE48869.2020.9368322Google Scholar
Hikamah, S.R. (2021). “Developing virtual communication skills in online learning based on modified PBL during the COVID-19 pandemic.” International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(2), 323–339. https://dx.doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2021.92.323.339Google Scholar
Houde, S., and Hill, C. (1997). “What do prototypes prototype?” In: Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 367–381). North-Holland. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-044481862-1.50082-0Google Scholar
Hung, W., Jonassen, D.H., and Liu, R. (2008). “Problem-based learning.” Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3(1), 485–506. https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203880869.ch38Google Scholar
Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B.B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., … and Eiderbäck, B. (2003, April). “Technology probes: Inspiring design for and with families.” In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 17–24). 10.1145/642611.642616Google Scholar
Mills, G.E. (2000). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey (USA).Google Scholar
Plomp, T. (2013). “Educational design research: An introduction.” In: Educational Design Research, pp.11–50.Google Scholar
Prince, K. J., Van Eijs, P. W., Boshuizen, H. P., Van Der Vleuten, C. P., & Scherpbier, A. J. (2005). General competencies of problem-based learning (PBL) and non-PBL graduates. Medical education, 39(4), 394–401.Google ScholarPubMed
Roxå, T., and Mårtensson, K. (2008). “Strategic educational development: A national Swedish initiative to support change in higher education.” Higher Education Research & Development, 27(2), 155–168. 10.1080/07294360701805291Google Scholar
Saqr, M., Nouri, J., Vartiainen, H., and Malmberg, J. (2020). “What makes an online problem-based group successful? A learning analytics study using social network analysis.” BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1–11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-01997-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sancassani, S., Brambilla, F., Casiraghi, D., and Marenghi, P. (2019). Designing learning innovation. Pearson, Milan, Turin.Google Scholar
Schmidt, H. G., Vermeulen, L., & Van der Molen, H. T. (2006). Longterm effects of problem-based learning: a comparison of competencies acquired by graduates of a problem-based and a conventional medical school. Medical education, 40(6), 562–567. 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02483.xGoogle Scholar
Valaitis, R.K., Sword, W.A., Jones, B., and Hodges, A. (2005). “Problem-based learning online: Perceptions of health science students.” Advances in Health Sciences Education, 10(3), 231–252. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-005-6705-3Google ScholarPubMed
Verganti, R. (2009). Design driven innovation: Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Verganti, R. (2018). Overcrowded: Designing meaningful products in a world awash with ideas. The MIT press, MA.Google Scholar
Wensveen, S., and Matthews, B. (2014). “Prototypes and prototyping in design research.” In: The Routledge Companion to Design Research (pp. 262–276).Google Scholar
Yurniwati, Y., and Utomo, E. (2020, October). “Problem-based learning flipped classroom design for developing higher-order thinking skills during the COVID-19 pandemic in geometry domain.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1663 (1), 012057. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012057Google Scholar