Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:33:25.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design strategies for consumers’ continued usage of reusable packaging systems (RPSS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Xueqing Miao ,
Lise Magnier  and
Ruth Mugge
Xueqing Miao*
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
Lise Magnier
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
Ruth Mugge
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands Amsterdam Business School, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Reusable packaging systems are emerging as a promising solution to combat the growing issue of packaging waste. While consumers generally recognise the environmental advantages of reuse, their actual reuse behaviours may result in insufficient reuse and an unintentional undermining of sustainability efforts. We conducted two creative workshops, created a large number of potential design interventions and further developed them into 16 design strategies for consumers' continued usage of RPSs through thematic analysis. These findings can inspire future research and the development of RPSs.

Keywords

design strategypackagingconsumer behaviourproduct longevity
Type
Design for Sustainability
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 1379 - 1388
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Abrahamse, W., Steg, L. Vlek, C. and Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackermann, L. Tuimaka, M. Pohlmeyer, A. E. and Mugge, R. (2021). Design for Product Care—Development of Design Strategies and a Toolkit for Sustainable Consumer Behaviour. Journal of Sustainability Research, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20210013Google Scholar
Babader, A. Ren, J. Jones, K. O. and Wang, J. (2016). A system dynamics approach for enhancing social behaviours regarding the reuse of packaging. Expert Systems with Applications, 46, 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, W. L, Aurisicchio, M, and Childs, P. R. N. (2016). Materials, use and contaminated interaction. Materials and Design, 90, 1218–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.04.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitzen-Heineke, E. F. Balta-Ozkan, N. and Reefke, H. (2017). The prospects of zero-packaging grocery stores to improve the social and environmental impacts of the food supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1528–1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethurem, M. Choate, B. and Bramwell, S. (2021). Stop piling on: Assessing efforts to reduce single-use water bottles at allegheny college. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168864Google Scholar
Bhamra, T. Lilley, D. and Tang, T. (2011). Design for Sustainable Behaviour: Using products to change consumer behaviour. Design Journal, 14(4), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630611X13091688930453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridgens, B. Lilley, D. Smalley, G. and Balasundaram, K. (2015). Ageing gracefully to increase product longevity. Proceeding of Product Lifetimes And The Environment, June, 1–8.Google Scholar
Cash, P. Wrobel, A. Maier, A. and Hansen, J. P. (2023). Understanding long-term behaviour change techniques: a mixed methods study. Journal of Engineering Design 34:5-6, 383-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2023.2227933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Changwichan, K. and Gheewala, S. H. (2020). Choice of materials for takeaway beverage cups towards a circular economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 22, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. (2005). Emotionally Durable Design: Objects, Experiences and Empathy. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
Choi, Y. J. Stevens, J. and Brass, C. (2018). Carative Factors in the Design Development Process: Towards Understanding Owner–Object Detachment and Promoting Object Longevity. Design Journal, 21(4), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2018.1468166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coelho, P. M. Corona, B. ten Klooster, R. and Worrell, E. (2020). Sustainability of reusable packaging–Current situation and trends. Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X, 6(November 2019), 100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcrx.2020.100037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorn, M. and Stöckli, S. (2018). Social influence fosters the use of a reusable takeaway box. Waste Management, 79, 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.07.027CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EU: Proposal packaging and packaging waste (2022) Environment. Available at: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/publications/proposal-packaging-and-packaging-waste_en (Accessed: 13 November 2023).Google Scholar
Ellsworth-Krebs, K. Rampen, C. Rogers, E. Dudley, L. and Wishart, L. (2022). Circular economy infrastructure: Why we need track and trace for reusable packaging. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957), A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Row, Peterson and Company, Evanston, IL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetner, H. and Miller, S. A. (2021). Environmental payback periods of reusable alternatives to single-use plastic kitchenware products. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 26(8), 1521–1537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01946-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogg, B. (2009). A behavior model for persuasive design. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 350. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541999Google Scholar
Green, Todd and Peloza, John (2014), “Finding the Right Shade of Green: The Effect ofAdvertising Appeal Type on Environmentally Friendly Consumption,” Journal ofAdvertising, 43 (2), 128–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, X. Dong, M. He, Y. Shen, J. Jing, W. Yang, N. and Guo, X. (2020). Research on the design of and preference for collection modes of reusable takeaway containers to promote sustainable consumption. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134764CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, Y. and Choi, S. M. (2005). Antecedents of Green Purchase Behavior : An Examination of Collectivism , Environmental Concern , and Perceived Consumer Effectiveness. Advances in Consumer Research, 32(August), 592–599.Google Scholar
Kuzmina, K. Prendeville, S. Walker, D. and Charnley, F. (2019). Future scenarios for fast-moving consumer goods in a circular economy. Futures, 107(April 2018), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindh, H. Olsson, A. and Williams, H. (2016). Consumer Perceptions of Food Packaging: Contributing to or Counteracting Environmentally Sustainable Development? Packaging and Technology and Science, 29, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lofthouse, V. A. Bhamra, T. A. and Trimingham, R. L. (2009). Investigating customer perceptions of refillable packaging and assessing business drivers and barriers to their use. Packaging Technology and Science, 22(6), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lofthouse, V. and Prendeville, S. (2018). Human-Centred Design of Products And Services for the Circular Economy–A Review. Design Journal, 21(4), 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2018.1468169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnier, L. and Gil-Pérez, I. (2021). Reviving the milk man: Consumers’ evaluations of circular reusable packaging offers. 4th PLATE 2021 Virtual Conference, May. http://hdl.handle.net/10344/10227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnier, L. and Schoormans, J. (2015). Consumer reactions to sustainable packaging: The interplay of visual appearance, verbal claim and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miao, X. Magnier, L. and Mugge, R. (2023). Switching to reuse? An exploration of consumers’ perceptions and behaviour towards reusable packaging systems. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 193(March), 106972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michie, S. van Stralen, M. M. and West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6(1), 1-11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muranko, Ż. Tassell, C. van der Laan, A. Z. and Aurisicchio, M. (2021). Characterisation and environmental value proposition of reuse models for fast-moving consumer goods: Reusable packaging and products. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(5), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052609Google Scholar
Steinhorst, J. and Beyerl, K. (2021). First reduce and reuse, then recycle! Enabling consumers to tackle the plastic crisis – Qualitative expert interviews in Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313(May), 127782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenis, N. D. Herpen, E. Van, Lans, I. A. Van Der, Ligthart, T. N. and Trijp, H. C. M. Van. (2017). Consumer response to packaging design: The role of packaging materials and graphics in sustainability perceptions and product evaluations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šuškevičė, V. and Kruopienė, J. (2021). Improvement of packaging circularity through the application of reusable beverage cup reuse models at outdoor festivals and events. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010247Google Scholar
Tassell, C. and Aurisicchio, M. (2023). Refill at home for fast-moving consumer goods: Uncovering compliant and divergent consumer behaviour. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 39(November 2022), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.04.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trope, Y. and Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Berge, R. Magnier, L. and Mugge, R. (2021). Too good to go? Consumers’ replacement behaviour and potential strategies for stimulating product retention. Current Opinion in Psychology, 39, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Werff, E. Steg, L. and Keizer, K. (2014). Follow the signal: When past pro-environmental actions signal who you are. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.07.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verplanken, B. and Wood, W. (2006). Interventions to Break and Create Consumer Habits Bas. American Marketing Association, 9156.Google Scholar
White, K., Dahl, D.W., 2006. To be or not be? The influence of dissociative reference groups on consumer preferences. J. Consum. Psych. 16 (4), 404–414. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, K. Habib, R. and Hardisty, D. J. (2019). How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919825649CrossRefGoogle Scholar