Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:54:26.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DESIGN KNOWLEDGE REUSE IN DESIGN OF PROGRESSIVE STAMPING TOOLS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Carl-Johan Jonsson ,
Roland Stolt  and
Fredrik Elgh
Carl-Johan Jonsson*
Affiliation:
Jönköping University
Roland Stolt
Affiliation:
Jönköping University
Fredrik Elgh
Affiliation:
Jönköping University
*
Jonsson, Carl-Johan, Jönköping University, Product development, Production and Design, Sweden, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Progressive stamping tools are widely used in mass-production of sheet metal components and their performance is critical as the design of the tool impact the cost of the manufactured component significantly.

Knowledge reuse is an important part of successful design in general, and in progressive stamping tool design in particular. In the study described in this paper, 8 tool designers from 5 different Swedish companies were interviewed about (1) at what points in the tool design process they search for previously designed tools for information and knowledge reuse, (2) under what conditions and for what reasons does this reuse take place, and (3) what types of information and knowledge are sought for at each point. The results show that reuse of information and knowledge from previously designed tools happens in many parts of the tool design process. The reasons and conditions for reuse vary depending on where in the process the designer is. High component complexity is one example of a common factor triggering reuse. Also, information about the performance of the tool is important to tool designers, as they only want to reuse information and knowledge from tools with good performance and low maintenance.

Keywords

Design practiceKnowledge managementDesign processDesign reuseStamping tools
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 1053 - 1062
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Allard, S., Levine, K.J. and Tenopir, C. (2009), “Design engineers and technical professionals at work: Observing information usage in the workplace”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 60 No. 3, pp. 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baya, V., Gevins, J., Baudin, C., Mabogunje, A., Toye, G. and Leifer, L. (1992), “Experimental study of design information reuse”, in: 4th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, 13-16 September 1992, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Design Engineering Division (Publication) DE, pp. 141–147.Google Scholar
Boren, T. and Ramey, J. (2000), “Thinking aloud: Reconciling theory and practice”, IEEE transactions on professional communication, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Court, A. (1997), “The relationship between information and personal knowledge in new product development”, International journal of information management, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czarniawska, B. (2007), Shadowing: and other techniques for doing fieldwork in modern societies, Copenhagen Business School Press DK.Google Scholar
Demian, P. and Fruchter, R. (2006), “An ethnographic study of design knowledge reuse in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 184–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsson, C.J., Stolt, R. and Elgh, F. (2020), “Stamping tools for sheet metal forming: Current state and future research directions”, in: 27th ISTE International Conference on Transdisciplinary Engineering, Warsaw, Poland, 1-10 July 2020, IOS Press, pp. 281–290.Google Scholar
Khadilkar, D.V. and Stauffer, L.A. (1996), “An experimental evaluation of design information reuse during conceptual design”, Journal of Engeering Design, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuffner, T.A. and Ullman, D.G. (1991), “The information requests of mechanical design engineers”, Design studies, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leacock, A.G. (2012), “The future of sheet metal forming research”, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 366–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, C., Lowe, A. and Culley, S. (2004), “Knowledge management in engineering design: personalization and codification”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchy, I. (2006), Handbook of die design, Vol. 1998, McGraw-Hill New York.Google Scholar