Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:04:28.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DESIGN FOR RESILIENT HUMAN-SYSTEM INTERACTION IN AUTONOMY: THE CASE OF A SHORE CONTROL CENTRE FOR UNMANNED SHIPS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Erik Aleksander Veitch ,
Thomas Kaland  and
Ole Andreas Alsos
Erik Aleksander Veitch*
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Thomas Kaland
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Ole Andreas Alsos
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
*
Veitch, Erik Aleksander, NTNU, Department of Design, Norway, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Artificial intelligence is transforming how we interact with vehicles. We examine the case of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS), which are emerging as a safer and more effective solution for maritime transportation. Despite the focus on autonomy, humans are predicted to have a central role in MASS operations from a Shore Control Centre (SCC). Here, operators will provide back-up control in the event of system failure. There are signification design challenges with such a system. The most critical is human-system interaction in autonomy (H-SIA). We consider humans as the source of resilience in the system for adapting to unexpected events and managing safety. We ask, can Human-Centred Design (HCD) be used to create resilient interactions between MASS and SCC? Work has been done in resilience engineering for complex systems but has not been extended to H-SIA in transportation. “Resilient interaction design” is relevant as we progress from design to operational phase. We adopted the ISO 9421-210 guideline to structure our HCD approach. The result is an SCC designed for 1 Autonomy Operator (AO). The contribution is a demonstration of how resilient interaction design may lead to safer and more effective H-SIA in transportation.

Keywords

Shore Control CentreUser centred designDesign methodsSystems Engineering (SE)Autonomous Systems
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 1023 - 1032
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Ahvenjärvi, S. (2016), “The human element and autonomous ships”, TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 517–521. https://dx.doi.org/10.12716/1001.10.03.18.Google Scholar
Avinor (2021), Remote Towers: The technology of the future at Norwegian airports [online]. Avinor AS. Available at https://avinor.no/en/remote (accessed 3.23.21).Google Scholar
Bainbridge, L. (1982), “Ironies of Automation”, IFAC Proceedings, Vol. 15, pp 129–135. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)62897-0Google Scholar
Burmeister, H.C., Bruhn, W., Rødseth, Ø.J., Porathe, T. (2014), “Autonomous Unmanned Merchant Vessel and its Contribution towards the e-Navigation Implementation: The MUNIN Perspective”, International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, Vol. 1, pp. 1–13. DIO: 10.1016/j.enavi.2014.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C.H., Kontovas, C., Yu, Q., Yang, Z. (2020), “Risk assessment of the operations of maritime autonomous surface ships”, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 207, pp. 1–11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107324Google Scholar
Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., Lopez, A., Koltun, V. (2017), “CARLA: An open urban driving simulator”, Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Robot Learning, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Mountain View, CA, USA, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Dybvik, H., Veitch, E., Steinert, M. (2020), “Exploring challenges with designing and developing Shore Control Centres (SCC) for autonomous ships”, Proceedings of the Design Society: Design Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 847–856. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, A., Heijer, T. (2006), “Defining resilience”, In: Hollnagel, E., Woods, D.D., Levesen, N. (Ed.), Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 35–40.Google Scholar
Hanington, B., Martin, B. (2012), Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions. Rockport Publishers, Beverly, MA, USA.Google Scholar
IMO (2017), International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW) 1978, as amended in 1995/2010, International Maritime Organization, London.Google Scholar
ISO (2019), NS-EN ISO 9241-210:2019, Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Katsivela, M. (2020), “Unmanned Vessels and Regulatory Concerns”, Journal of International Maritime Law, Vol. 26, pp. 239–252.Google Scholar
Kim, T., Mallam, S. (2020), “A Delphi-AHP study on STCW leadership competence in the age of autonomous maritime operations”, WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, Vol. 19, pp. 163–181. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13437-020-00203-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leveson, N.G. (2016), Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Lunde-Hanssen, L.S., Braseth, A.O., Strand, S. (2020), Identification of information requirements in ROC operations room (No. IFE/E-2020/007), IFE, Halden, Norway.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, S., Man, Y., Baldauf, M. (2015). Final Report: Shore Control Centre. MUNIN Project, Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
Massterly (2021), Making autonomy a reality, [online]. Massterly AS. Available at https://www.massterly.com/news (accessed 3.21.21).Google Scholar
MiT (2020), Roboat Project. [online]. MIT. Available at: roboat.org (accessed 11.19.20).Google Scholar
Nicas, J., Kitroeff, N., Gelles, D., & Glanz, J. (2019). Boeing Built Deadly Assumptions into 737 Max, Blind to a Late Design Change. [online]. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/01/business/boeing-737-max-crash.html (accessed 3.17.21).Google Scholar
NTNU (2020), Autoferry. [online]. NTNU. Available at: ntnu.edu/autoferry (accessed 10.1.20).Google Scholar
NTNU (2021a), SFI AutoShip. [online]. NTNU. Available at: ntnu.edu/sfi-autoship (accessed 3.21.21).Google Scholar
NTNU (2021b), NTNU Shore Control Lab. [online]. NTNU. Available at: https://www.ntnu.edu/shorecontrol (accessed 4.21.21)Google Scholar
Parasuraman, R., Wickens, C.D. (2008), “Humans: Still Vital After All These Years of Automation”, Human Factors, Vol. 50, pp. 511–520. https://dx.doi.org/10.1518/001872008X312198.Google ScholarPubMed
Peeters, G., Yayla, G., Catoor, T., Van Baelen, S., Afzal, M.R., Christofakis, C., Storms, S., Boonen, R., Slaets, P. (2020), “An Inland Shore Control Centre for Monitoring or Controlling Unmanned Inland Cargo Vessels”, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 10: 758. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jmse8100758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos, M.A, Thieme, C.A., Utne, I.B., Mosleh, A. (2020a), “Human-system concurrent task analysis for maritime autonomous surface ship operation and safety”, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 195. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos, M.A., Thieme, C.A., Utne, I.B., Mosleh, A. (2020b), “A generic approach to analysing failures in human–System interaction in autonomy,” Safety Science, Vol. 129. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, N.P., Zadeh, M.K., Thieme, C.A., Skjetne, R., Sorensen, A.J., Aanondsen, S.A., Breivik, M., Eide, E. (2019), “Zero-Emission Autonomous Ferries for Urban Water Transport: Cheaper, Cleaner Alternative to Bridges and Manned Vessels”, IEEE Electrification Magazine, Vol. 7, pp. 32–45.Google Scholar
Rødseth, Ø.J. (2017), Definitions for Autonomous Merchant Ships, NFAS, Trondheim, Norway.Google Scholar
Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Stanton, N.A. (2016), “Pilot error versus sociotechnical systems failure: a distributed situation awareness analysis of Air France 447”, Vol. 17, pp. 64–79. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2015.1106618Google Scholar
Thieme, C.A., Utne, I.B. (2017), “Safety performance monitoring of autonomous marine systems”, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 159, pp. 264–275. https://dx.doi.org/10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thieme, C.A., Utne, I.B., Haugen, S. (2018), “Assessing ship risk model applicability to Marine Autonomous Surface Ships”, Ocean Engineering, Vol. 165, pp. 140–154. https://dx.doi.org/10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (2017). Collision Between a Car Operating With Automated Vehicle Control Systems and a Tractor-Semitrailer Truck Near Williston, Florida May 7, 2016, Accident Report HAR1702, National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, D.C., USA.Google Scholar
Vagia, M., Transeth, A.A., Fjerdingen, S.A. (2016), “A literature review on the levels of automation during the years. What are the different taxonomies that have been proposed?” Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 53, pp. 190–202. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasstein, K., Brekke, E.F., Mester, R., Eide, E. (2020), “Autoferry Gemini: a real-time simulation platform for electromagnetic radiation sensors on autonomous ships”, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 929, 012032. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/929/1/012032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veitch, E., Hynnekleiv, A., Lützhöft, M. (2020), “The Operator's Stake in Shore Control Centre Design: A Stakeholder Analysis for Autonomous Ships”, Proceedings of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects. Presented at the Human Factors, The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.3940/hf.20Google Scholar
Vy (2020), Try Europe's first self-driving reservation-only bus. [online] Vy. Available at: https://www.vy.no/en/news/europes-first-self-driving-bus (accessed 12.4.20).Google Scholar
Wróbel, K., Montewka, J., Kujala, P. (2018), “System-theoretic approach to safety of remotely-controlled merchant vessel,” Ocean Engineering, Vol. 152, pp. 334–345. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.01.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar