Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:19:54.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design as a practice for implementing complex digital health: preliminary results from an interview study in the Netherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Fredrik K. Karlsson ,
Valeria Pannunzio ,
Dirk Snelders  and
Maaike S. Kleinsmann
Fredrik K. Karlsson*
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
Valeria Pannunzio
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
Dirk Snelders
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
Maaike S. Kleinsmann
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Challenges in implementing digital health in clinical practice hinder its potential. The complexities posed by implementation could benefit from using design practices. To explore the current role of design practices in digital health implementation, designers in the Netherlands were interviewed. The preliminary results indicate that designers contribute to digital health implementation processes, especially in the early stages. Design practices are mainly used for engaging the users, testing concepts, aligning the ideas of stakeholders, and adapting interventions to fit within the contexts.

Keywords

implementation sciencedesign practicedigital healthcomplexityhealthcare design
Type
Design for Healthcare
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 1607 - 1616
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Bauer, M. S., Damschroder, L., Hagedorn, H., Smith, J., and Kilbourne, A. M. (2015), "An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist", BMC psychology, Vol. 3 Article 32, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0089-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006), "Using thematic analysis in psychology", Qualitative research in psychology, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, R. (2009), "Thinking about design: An historical perspective", In: Meijers, A. (Ed.), Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences, Elsevier, North-Holland. pp. 409-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51667-1.50020-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Digital Health Center of Excellence (DHCE). (2020), What is digital health? [online] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health-center-excellence/what-digital-health (accessed 23.09.2023).Google Scholar
Cafazzo, J. A. (2020), "Design for digital health", In: Sethumadhavan, A. and Sasangohar, F. (Eds.), Design for Health: Applications of Human Factors, Academic Press, Cambridge, pp. 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816427-3.00003-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cash, P., Isaksson, O., Maier, A., & Summers, J. (2022), "Sampling in design research: Eight key considerations", Design studies, Vol. 78, 101077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, N. (1982), "Designerly ways of knowing", Design Studies, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 221-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, A., Christie, G. J., & Moreno, S. (2022), "The challenges toward real-world implementation of digital health design approaches: narrative review", JMIR Human Factors, Vol. 9 No. 3, e35693. https://dx.doi.org/10.2196/35693CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eccles, M.P., Mittman, B.S., (2006), "Welcome to implementation science", Implementation Science. Vol. 1 Article 1, pp. 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fielding, N and Thomas, H. (2001), "Qualitative Interviewing", In: Gilbert, N (Ed.), Researching Social Life. 2nd edn, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp. 123-143.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Papoutsi, C., Lynch, J., Hughes, G., Hinder, S., and Shaw, …, S. (2017), "Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies", Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 19 No. 11, p. e8775. https://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huynh-Dagher, S., Lamé, G., Duong, T. A., & Jankovic, M. (2022), "Design research in healthcare: a systematic literature review of key design journals", Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 33 No. 8-9, pp. 522-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2022.2123702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomas, J. (1993), "Diffusion, dissemination, and implementation: who should do what?", Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 703 No. 1, pp. 226-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26351.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, C. (2006), "A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care", BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 6 Article 86, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-86CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norman, D. A., and Stappers, P. J. (2015), "DesignX: complex sociotechnical systems", She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 83-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2016.01.002Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (2014), Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice, SAGE publications, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
Proctor, E. K., Powell, B. J., and McMillen, J. C. (2013), "Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting", Implementation Science, Vol. 8, Article 139, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-139CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rittel, H. W., and Webber, M. M. (1973), "Dilemmas in a general theory of planning", Policy Sciences, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J., Stevenson, F., Dack, C., Pal, K., May, C., Michie, S., … & Murray, E. (2018), "Developing an implementation strategy for a digital health intervention: an example in routine healthcare", "BMC health services research", Vol 18 No. 1, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3615-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H (1996), The sciences of the artificial (3rd edn), The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. W. C. (2022), "Implementation of health technology: Directions for research and practice", Frontiers in Digital Health, Vol. 4, 1030194. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1030194CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wachter, R. (2016), Making IT work: harnessing the power of health information technology to improve care in England. London, UK: Department of Health, 1-71.Google Scholar
Waltz, T. J., Powell, B. J., Matthieu, M. M., Damschroder, L. J., Chinman, M. J., Smith, J. L., and Kirchner, …, E, J.. (2015), "Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study", Implementation Science, Vol. 10, Article 109, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0295-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO. (2019), Digital health. https://www.who.int/health-topics/digital-health#tab=tab_2 (accessed 2023-03-17).Google Scholar