Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:50:58.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DERIVE AND INTEGRATE SUSTAINABILITY CRITERIA IN DESIGN SPACE EXPLORATION OF ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED COMPONENTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Adam Mallalieu ,
Julian Martinsson Bonde ,
Matilda Watz ,
Johanna Wallin Nylander ,
Sophie I. Hallstedt  and
Ola Isaksson
Adam Mallalieu*
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology;
Julian Martinsson Bonde
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology;
Matilda Watz
Affiliation:
Blekinge Institute of Technology;
Johanna Wallin Nylander
Affiliation:
GKN Aerospace
Sophie I. Hallstedt
Affiliation:
Blekinge Institute of Technology;
Ola Isaksson
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology;
*
Mallalieu, Adam Mattias, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Additive manufacturing has the potential to decrease the climate impact of aviation by providing more light-weight designs. Sustainability is however required to be assessed from a systemic view, including all lifecycle phases, and from a social, ecologic, and economic dimension. This is however challenging in early phase design, where also a large design space need to be explored. A case study is carried out with an aerospace company where two candidate engineering design tools are combined to address this. The integration of these two engineering tools are applied on a Turbine Rear Structure, and shows promising results in enabling a systemic view of sustainability to be integrated and assessed in early phase design space explorations of additive manufactured components. It is recommended that the integration between the two tools is further established and validated.

Keywords

SustainabilityDesign methodsAdditive ManufacturingDigital Design ExperimentsSustainability Criteria
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 1197 - 1206
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

ACARE. (2022). Fly the Green Deal (tech. rep.). https://www.acare4europe.orgGoogle Scholar
Al Handawi, K., Andersson, P., Panarotto, M., Isaksson, O., & Kokkolaras, M. (2020), “Scalable Set Based Design Optimization and Remanufacturing for Meeting Changing Requirements”, Journal of Mechanical Design, 143(2). http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047908Google Scholar
Bertoni, A., Hallstedt, S. I., Dasari, S. K., & Andersson, P. (2020), “Integration of value and sustainability assessment in design space exploration by machine learning: An aerospace application”, Design Science, 6, e2. http://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2019.29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgue, O., Valjak, F., Panarotto, M., & Isaksson, O. (2020), “Supporting additive manufacturing technology development through constraint modelling in early conceptual design: A satellite propulsion case study”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, 1, 817–826. http://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.289Google Scholar
Carlsson, S., Mallalieu, A., Almefelt, L., & Malmqvist, J. (2021), “Design for longevity - a framework to support the designing of a product's optimal lifetime”, Proceedings of the Design Society, 1, 1003–1012. http://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dordlofva, C., Lindwall, A., & Torlind, P. (2016), “Opportunities and challenges for additive manufacturing in space applications”, Proceedings of NordDesign, NordDesign 2016, 1, 401–410.Google Scholar
Ford, S., & Despeisse, M. (2016), “Additive manufacturing and sustainability: An exploratory study of the advantages and challenges”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1573–1587. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gericke, K., Eckert, C., & Stacey, M. (2017), “What do we need to say about a design method?” Proceedings of the Design Society, 7.Google Scholar
Gericke, K., Eckert, C., Campean, F., Clarkson, P. J., Flening, E., Isaksson, O., & Wilmsen, …, M. (2020), “Supporting designers: moving from method menagerie to method ecosystem”, Design Science, 6, e21. http://https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallstedt, S. I. (2017), “Sustainability criteria and sustainability compliance index for decision support in product development”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 251–266. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallstedt, S. I., & Isaksson, O. (2017), “Material criticality assessment in early phases of sustainable product development”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 40–52. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallstedt, S. I., Isaksson, O., Watz, M., Mallalieu, A., & Schulte, J. (2022), “Forming digital sustainable product development support”, Proceedings of NordDesign, NordDesign 2022.Google Scholar
Hallstedt, S. I., Villamil, C., Lövdahl, J., & Nylander, J. W. (2023), “Sustainability fingerprint - guiding companies in anticipating the sustainability direction in early design”, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 37, 424–442. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.03.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kravchenko, M., Pigosso, D. C., & McAloone, T. C. (2019), “Towards the ex-ante sustainability screening of circular economy initiatives in manufacturing companies: Consolidation of leading sustainability-related performance indicators”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118318. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwok, S. Y., Schulte, J., & Hallstedt, S. I. (2020), “Approach for sustainability criteria and product life-cycle data simulation in concept selection”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, 1, 1979–1988. http://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.297Google Scholar
Liu, G., Xiong, Y., & Rosen, D. W. (2021), “Multidisciplinary design optimization in design for additive manufacturing”, Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 9(1), 128–143. http://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwab073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallalieu, A., Hajali, T., Isaksson, O., & Panarotto, M. (2022), “The role of digital infrastructure for the industrialisation of design for additive manufacturing”, Proceedings of the Design Society, 2, 1401– 1410. http://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinsson Bonde, J., Brahma, A., Panarotto, M., Isaksson, O., Wärmefjord, K., Söderberg, R., Kipouros, T., Clarkson, P. J., Kressin, J., & Andersson, , P. (2022), “Assessment of weld manufacturability of alternative jet engine structural components through digital experiments”. ISABE 2022.Google Scholar
Nilsson, S., Sundin, E., & Lindahl, M. (2018), “Integrated product service offerings – Challenges in setting requirements”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 879–887. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramani, K., Ramanujan, D., Bernstein, W. Z., Zhao, F., Sutherland, J., Handwerker, C., Choi, J.-K., Kim, H., & Thurston, D. (2010), “Integrated sustainable life cycle design: A review”, Journal of Mechanical Design, 132. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, W. P. (2006), “Life Cycle Tools within Ford of Europe's Product Sustainability Index. Case Study Ford S-MAX & Ford Galaxy (8 pp)”, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11, 315–322. http://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.08.267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, J., & Hallstedt, S. I. (2018), “Workshop method for early sustainable product development”, Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, 6, 2751–2762. http://doi.org/10.21278/IDC.2018.0209Google Scholar
Taguchi, G., & Clausing, D. (1990), “Robust quality”, Harvard business review, 68(1), 65–75.Google Scholar
Villamil, C., Nylander, J., Hallstedt, S. I., Schulte, J., & Watz, M. (2018), “Additive manufacturing from a strategic sustainability perspective”, Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, 3, 1381–1392. http://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0353Google Scholar
Walden, D. D., Roedler, G. J., & Forsberg, K. (2015), “INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook Version 4: Updating the Reference for Practitioners”, INCOSE International Symposium, 25(1), 678–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watz, M., & Hallstedt, S. I. (2021), “Depth and detail or quick and easy? Benefits and drawbacks of two approaches to define sustainability criteria in product development”, 12th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing (EcoDesign2021), Virtual Tokyo, 1-3 December 2021, 640–647.Google Scholar
Watz, M., & Hallstedt, S. I. (2022), “Towards sustainable product development – Insights from testing and evaluating a profile model for management of sustainability integration into design requirements”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 346, 131000. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watz, M., Johansson, C., Bertoni, A., & Hallstedt, S. I. (2022), “Investigating effects of group model building on sustainable design decision-making”, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 33, 846–862. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar