Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:32:29.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COMPLEX SYSTEMS DESIGN: SUSTAINABILITY CHALLENGES FOR SHIPBUILDING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Anne Bouyssou ,
Raphaël Baumler  and
Anna Öhrwall Rönnbäck
Anne Bouyssou*
Affiliation:
Luleå University of Technology;
Raphaël Baumler
Affiliation:
World Maritime University;
Anna Öhrwall Rönnbäck
Affiliation:
Luleå University of Technology
*
Bouyssou, Anne, University of Technology of Luleå, Sweden, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Ships are complex technical systems resulting from large scale and scope projects in which integration plays a key role, particularly because trade-offs have to be made between conflicting objectives.

Merchant ships are usually built with a perspective of twenty-five years of service. Ship owners detail their requirements and ship specifications in line with their strategy to remain competitive on specific segments of the shipping markets. Ships serve and organize global trade flows. The rise in environmental regulations and technological changes generate unprecedented uncertainties for ship owners.

Ships do not follow the usual systems engineering process, as there is no full-scale prototyping. Rules and standards deeply influence the design of ships and limit the possibilities to ’think outside the box’.

The purpose of this paper is to present environmental drivers relating to the operation of the ship which have, or will have, an influence on the way it is designed.

Keywords

Design engineeringShipComplexitySustainability
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 1027 - 1036
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Ahlers, R. (2004). Cooperative Design by Using Intelligent Electronic Supplier Catalogs in the Maritime Industry. Journal of Ship Production. Vol. 20. No. 3. pp 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, G. (2016). Dévoiler la vapeur : la construction navale au XIXe siècle. In Bouvier (Ed.), L'Europe en transitions : énergie, mobilité, communication XVIIIe-XXIe siècles. Nouveau Monde Editions.Google Scholar
Baumler, R., Carrera Arce, M., & Pazaver, A. (2021). Quantification of influence and interest at IMO in Maritime Safety and Human Element matters. Marine Policy, 133 (February), 104746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumler, R., & Ölçer, A. I. (2013). Is the 1969 Tonnage Measurement Convention still relevant? The Naval Architect.Google Scholar
Boisson, P. (1999). Safety at sea: Policies, regulations and international law. Bureau Veritas. Paris.Google Scholar
Carlisle, R. P. (1981). Sovereignty for sale: the origins and evolution of the Panamanian and Liberian flags of convenience. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press.Google Scholar
Clean Shipping Project Platform. (2022). https://cshipp.eu/ (retrieved on 15 November 2022).Google Scholar
De Kerchove, R. (1983). International Maritime Dictionary. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.Google Scholar
Drezner, J. A., Arena, M. V., McKernan, M., Murphy, R. & Riposo, J. (2011). Are Ships Different? Policies and Procedures for the Acquisition of Ship Programs. RAND NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE Santa Monica (CA). https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG991.htmlGoogle Scholar
Futch, V. & Allen, A. (2019). Search and Rescue Applications: On the Need to Improve Ocean Observing Data Systems in Offshore or Remote Locations. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, 301. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2019.00301/fullCrossRefGoogle Scholar
gCaptain. (2013). ClassNK Approves Minimal Ballast Water, Hard-Chined VLCC Design. Published on 6 March 2013. https://gcaptain.com/classnk-approves-minimal-ballast/ (retrieved on 9 November 2022).Google Scholar
GEF-UNDP-IMO GloBallast Partnerships Programme & GESAMP. (2011). Establishing equivalency in the performance testing and compliance monitoring of emerging alternative ballast water management systems: a technical review. GEF-UNDP-IMO GloBallast Partnerships, London, UK and GESAMP, GloBallast Monographs No. 20, GESAMP Reports and Studies No. 82. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/PartnershipsProjects/Documents/Mono20_English.pdfGoogle Scholar
GEF-UNDP-IMO GloBallast Partnerships Programme and WMU. (2013). Identifying and Managing Risks from Organisms Carried in Ships’ Ballast Water. Globallast Monograph No.21. GEF-UNDP-IMO GloBallast Partnerships and WMU.Google Scholar
Horn, G. E., Arima, T., Baumans, P., Bøe, A., & Ocakli, H. (2013). IACS Summary of the IMO GBS and the Harmonised Common Structural Rules. In TSCF 2013 Shipbuilders Meeting.Google Scholar
Hydro International. (2007). IMarEST supports Green Ship Campaign. https://www.hydro-international.com/content/news/imarest-supports-green-ship-campaign (Retrieval date: 27 October 2022).Google Scholar
International Maritime Organization. (2012). Short study on the 1969 TM Convention's impacts on crew well-being, vessel safety, limitation on innovation and competition distortion. MSC 90/INF.3. Submitted by the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF). London: IMO.Google Scholar
International Maritime Organization. (2017). International Convention of Training, certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW 78 as amended). Consolidated version 2017. London.Google Scholar
International Maritime Organization. (2018). Initial IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships. Resolution MEPC 304(72). https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/Environment/Documents/Resolution%20MEPC.304%2872%29_E.pdfGoogle Scholar
International Maritime Organization. (2020). International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974 and its Protocol of 1988. Consolidated edition 2020. London: IMO.Google Scholar
International Windship Association (www.wind-ship.org).Google Scholar
Jouffray, J.-B., Blasiak, R., Norström, A.V., Österblom, H. & Nyström, M. (2020). The Blue Acceleration: The Trajectory of Human Expansion into the Ocean. One Earth. Volume 2. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.12.016Google Scholar
Kotinis, M. & Parsons, M.G. (2010). Hydrodynamics of the ballast-free ship revisited. Journal of Ship Production and Design. 26(4). 301–310. https://doi.org/10.5957/jspd.2010.26.04.301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd's Register. (2015). Wind-powered shipping: a review of the commercial, regulatory and technical factors affecting uptake of wind-assisted propulsion. www.lr.org/windpowerGoogle Scholar
Ma, S. (2010). Using economic measures for global control of air pollution from ships. In C.T. Grammenos (Ed.) The Handbook of Maritime Economics and Business. Second Edition. Lloyd's List. London.Google Scholar
Mistree, F., Smith, W. F., Bras, B., Allen, J. K., & Muster, D. (1990). Decision-based design: a contemporary paradigm for ship design. Transactions, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 98(1990), 565–597.Google Scholar
Paine, L. (2014). The sea and civilization: a maritime history of the world. Atlantic Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Panayides, P. M. (2017). Fundamentals of ship management. In Shipping Operations Management (pp. 1–23). Springer.Google Scholar
Pettersen Strandenes, S. (2010). Economics of the markets for ships. In C.T. Grammenos (Ed.) The Handbook of Maritime Economics and Business. Second Edition. Lloyd's List. London.Google Scholar
Stopford, M. (2008). Maritime economics 3e. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Transparency International. (2018). Governance at the International Maritime Organization: The Case for Reform. Transparency International. Berlin. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/en/publications/governance-at-the-imo-the-case-for-reformGoogle Scholar
Tupper, E.C. (2004). Introduction to naval architecture. Fourth Edition. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Ulrich, K.T., Eppinger, S.D. & Yang, M.C. (2020). Product Design and Development. Seventh Edition. Mc Graw Hill. New York.Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2020). Decarbonizing maritime transport: estimating fleet renewal trends based on ship scrapping patterns. https://unctad.org/news/decarbonizing-maritime-transport-estimating-fleet-renewal-trends-based-ship-scrapping-patterns (retrieval date : 21 October 2022).Google Scholar
Vuillemey, G. (2020). Evading corporate responsibilities: Evidence from the shipping industry. Available at SSRN 3691188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D.G.M. (2002). Practical Ship Design. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Wollert, J., Lehne, M. and Hirsch, B.E. (1992). Modeling for Ship Design and Production. Journal of Ship Production. Vol. 8. No. 1. pp. 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, R. (2009). Masters Under God: Makers of Empire, 1816-1884. A history of the British Merchant Navy Volume Three. (Vol. 3). History Press Limited.Google Scholar