Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:11:35.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of e-scooter tyre performance using rolling resistance trailer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

George Stilwell*
Affiliation:
University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Shayne Gooch
Affiliation:
University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Martial Lafitte
Affiliation:
CESI Graduate School of Engineering, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

E-scooters are a cost-effective means of urban transport, however, there have been questions about their safety, performance, and energy efficiency. This paper investigates the rolling resistance of scooter tyres so that the performance of scooters can be more accurately determined. A rolling resistance trailer was manufactured to directly measure tractive force and closely approximate the rolling resistance force for nine commonly used scooter tyres at low speed on a smooth concrete surface. The results of this study will enable a better understanding of the energy losses of these devices.

Type
Design for Sustainability
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Abduljabbar, R.L., Liyanage, S. and Dia, H., 2021. The role of micro-mobility in shaping sustainable cities: A systematic literature review. Transportation research part D: transport and environment, 92, p.102734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acarer, S., Arslan, E. and Uyulan, Ç., 2021. Aerodynamic Investigation of an e-Scooter & Rider System through Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach. In 10th International Automotive Technologies Congress. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31017.11363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bascou, J., Sauret, C., Lavaste, F. and Pillet, H., 2017. Is bearing resistance negligible during wheelchair locomotion? Design and validation of a testing device. Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.5277/abb-00659-2016-03Google ScholarPubMed
Bergiers, A., Goubert, L. and Vuye, C., 2012. About the rolling resistance trailer and parameters influencing rolling resistance.Google Scholar
Bloom, M.B., Noorzad, A., Lin, C., Little, M., Lee, E.Y., Margulies, D.R. and Torbati, S.S., 2021. Standing electric scooter injuries: Impact on a community. The American Journal of Surgery, 221(1), pp.227-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.07.020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deng, Y., Wang, Z., Shen, H., Gong, J. and Xiao, Z., 2023. A comprehensive review on non-pneumatic tyre research. Materials & Design, p.111742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, B. and Sanguinetti, A., 2021. Facilitating micromobility for first and last mile connection with public transit through environmental design: a case study of California bay area rapid transit stations. Proceedings of the Design Society, 1, pp.1577-1586. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebhardt, L., Ehrenberger, S., Wolf, C. and Cyganski, R., 2022. Can shared E-scooters reduce CO2 emissions by substituting car trips in Germany?. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 109, p.103328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hieu, L.T. and Lim, O.T., 2023. Effects of the Structure and Operating Parameters on the Performance of an Electric Scooter. Sustainability, 15(11), p.8976. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollingsworth, J., Copeland, B. and Johnson, J.X., 2019. Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters. Environmental Research Letters, 14(8), p.084031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansson, V., 2022. A literature study of rolling resistance and its affecting factors.Google Scholar
Kauzlarich, J.J. and Thacker, J.G. (1985) 'Wheelchair tyre rolling resistance and fatigue', Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 22(3), 25-41, available: https://doi.org/10.1682/jrrd.1985.07.0025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K., Ju, J. and Kim, D.M., 2013. Static contact behaviors of a non-pneumatic tire with hexagonal lattice spokes. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Mechanical Systems, 6(2013-01-9117), pp. 1518-1527. https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-9117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostareli, A., Basbas, S., Stamatiadis, N. and Nikiforiadis, A., 2021. Attitudes of e-scooter non-users towards users. In Advances in Mobility-as-a-Service Systems: Proceedings of 5th Conference on Sustainable Urban Mobility, Virtual CSUM2020, June 17-19, 2020, Greece (pp. 87-96). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61075-3_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M., Chow, J.Y., Yoon, G. and He, B.Y., 2021. Forecasting e-scooter substitution of direct and access trips by mode and distance. Transportation research part D: transport and environment, 96, p.102892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liew, Y.K., Wee, C.P.J. and Pek, J.H., 2020. New peril on our roads: a retrospective study of electric scooter-related injuries. Singapore medical journal, 61(2), p.92. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2019083CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mesimäki, J. and Lehtonen, E., 2023. Light electric vehicles: the views of users and non-users. European Transport Research Review, 15(1), p.33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-023-00611-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orozco-Fontalvo, M., Llerena, L. and Cantillo, V., 2023. Dockless electric scooters: A review of a growing micromobility mode. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 17(4), pp.406-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2022.2044097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petterson, T. C. and Gooch, S. D., 2020. Rolling Resistance of ATV Tyres in Agriculture. Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference. Cambridge University Press, 1, pp. 25612570. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.75Google Scholar
Ritchie, H. and Roser, M., 2018. Urbanization. Our world in data.Google Scholar
Sardinha, M., Fátima Vaz, M., Ramos, T.R. and Reis, L., 2023. Design, properties, and applications of non-pneumatic tires: A review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207231177302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stilwell, G., Gooch, S., Goodwin, M. and Zarifeh, H., 2023. Evaluation of e-scooter tyre performance using dynamometer-based coast-down tests. Proceedings of the Design Society, 3, pp.1695-1704. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinet, A., Bernard, P.L., Ducomps, C., Selchow, O., Le Gallais, D. and Micallef, J.P., 1998. A field deceleration test to assess total wheelchair resistance. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 21(4), pp.397-402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, M., Cloos, K.C. and Helmers, E., 2020. Energy efficiency trade-offs in small to large electric vehicles. Environmental Sciences Europe, 32(1), pp.1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00307-8Google Scholar
Zarif, R., Pankratz, D. and Kelman, B., 2019. Small is beautiful: Making micromobility work for citizens, cities, and service providers. Deloitte Insights.Google Scholar