No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERPERSONAL PHONETIC COMMUNICATION IN RESONANCE DURING CO-CREATION
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 June 2023
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
This study is aimed to understand the relationship between resonance and interpersonal phonetic communication during co-creation from the following points of view: linguistic functional factors and paralinguistic factors. The novice designers were assigned a concept generation task in pairs from the two nouns, “weather” and “stationery”. Linguistic function tags were contracted into five tag groups, Stuckness, Question, Seriousness, Proposition and Positiveness. The results suggest that phonetic communication in resonance showed significantly lower Stuckness and higher Positiveness towards the counterpart's utterances; Silence-based conversation was significantly observed when both were in creative states but had not reached resonance; Resonance was significantly more likely to occur with communication where one mainly spoke and the other also responded with utterances, neither one spoke in dominant amounts, or both spoke in equal amounts.
This study will contribute to understanding and facilitating resonance, which is an essential phenomenon in individual/interpersonal/group creativity, with practical implications, especially for co-creative concept generation and sustainable creative flow in collaborative design.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Antoniou, R., Dekonick, E. and Bonvoisin, J. (2019), “Exploring the role of linguistic abstraction in idea-generation sessions”, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), Cambridge University Press, Delft, pp. 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilda, Z., Edmonds, E. and Candy, L. (2008), “Designing for creative engagement”, Design Studies, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 525–540.Google Scholar
Costello, F.J. and Keane, M.T. (2000), “Efficient creativity: Constraint-guided conceptual combination”, Cogn. Sci., Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998), “Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity”, in Sternberg, R.J. (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity, Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, pp. 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depraz, N. and Cosmelli, D. (2003), “Empathy and Openness: Practices of Intersubjectivity at the Core of the Science of Consciousness”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 29 No. sup1, pp. 163–203.Google Scholar
Ephratt, M. (2011), “Linguistic, paralinguistic and extralinguistic speech and silence”, Journal of Pragmatics, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 43 No. 9, pp. 2286–2307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, M., Cardoso, C. and Badke-Schaub, P. (2013), “Inspiration peak: exploring the semantic distance between design problem and textual inspirational stimuli”, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itakura, H. and Tsui, A.B.M. (2004), “Gender and conversational dominance in Japanese conversation”, Language in Society, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 223–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St. John, P. a. (2007), “Interactive and Emergent Processes: Possibilities and Problems in Group Creativity”, Mind, Culture, and Activity, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 290–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, M.W. (2017), “Voice-only communication enhances empathic accuracy”, American Psychologist, Vol. 72 No. 7, pp. 644–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsumae, A. and Nagai, Y. (2018), “The function of co-creation in dynamic mechanism of intersubjectivity formation among individuals”, Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, Vol. 4, pp. 1925–1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumae, A. and Nagai, Y. (2019), “Dynamic Mechanism of Co-Creation to Form Intersubjectivity among Individuals in Various Contexts”, Journal of Japan Creativity Society, Vol. 22, pp. 21–38.Google Scholar
Matsumae, A., Shoji, K. and Motomura, Y. (2022), “An Attempt to Grasp Resonance during Co-Creation with Biosignal Indicators”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 2, pp. 921–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagai, Y. (2015), “A Sense of Design: The Embedded Motives of Nature, Culture, and Future”, in Taura, T. (Ed.), Principia Designae － Pre-Design, Design, and Post-Design, Springer Japan, pp. 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagai, Y., Candy, L. and Edmonds, E. (2003), “Representations of design Thinking- A Review of Recent Studies”, Journal of the Asian Design International Conference.Google Scholar
Nagai, Y. and Taura, T. (2017), “Critical Issues of Advanced Design Thinking: Scheme of Synthesis, Realm of Out-Frame, Motive of Inner Sense, and Resonance to Future Society”, pp. 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagai, Y., Taura, T. and Mukai, F. (2009), “Role of Concept Blending and Dissimilarity in Creative Concept Generation Process: Comparisons between the Linguistic Interpretation Task and Design Task”, Cognitive Studies, Japanese Cognitive Science Society, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 209–230.Google Scholar
Park, J.R. (2007), “Interpersonal and affective communication in synchronous online discourse”, Library Quarterly, Vol. 77 No. 2, pp. 133–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulus, P.B. and Brown, V.R. (2007), “Toward more creative and innovative group idea generation: A cognitive-social-motivational perspective of brainstorming.”, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Paulus, Paul B.: Box 19047, Arlington, TX, US, 76019-0047, [email protected], Vol. 1, pp. 248–265.Google Scholar
Rickards, T. (1999), “Brainstorming Revisited: A Question of Context”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Wiley, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, R.E. (1984), “Style, meaning, and message effects”, Communication Monographs, Routledge, Vol. 51 No. 2, pp. 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, R.K. (2011), Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schuller, B., Steidl, S., Batliner, A., Burkhardt, F., Devillers, L., Müller, C. and Narayanan, S. (2013), “Paralinguistics in speech and language - State-of-the-art and the challenge”, Computer Speech and Language, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 4–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, A., Huidobro Pereda, A. and Gonçalves, M. (2019), “Sprinting Out of Stuckness: Overcoming Moments of Stuckness to Support the Creativity Flow in Agile Team Settings”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 2347–2356.Google Scholar
Shoji, K., Sawai, K. and Matsumae, A. (2023), “Creative States Estimation and Resonance Detection using Hidden Markov Models”, Journal of Japan Creativity Society, Vol. 26 No. 1.Google Scholar
Sonalkar, N., Mabogunje, A. and Leifer, L. (2013), “Developing a visual representation to characterize moment-to-moment concept generation in design teams”, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taura, T. and Nagai, Y. (2009), “A Definition of Design and Its Creative Features”, Proceedings of International Association of Societies of Design Research 2009, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Taura, T. and Nagai, Y. (2010), “Research Issues and Methodologies in Design Theoretics — From the Viewpoints of ‘Future’, ‘Ideal’ and “Composition”, Cognitive Studies, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 389–402.Google Scholar
Taura, T., Yamamoto, E., Yusof, M. and Fasiha, N. (2012), “Constructive simulation of creative concept generation process in design: a research method for difficult-to- observe design-thinking processes”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Won, A.S., Bailenson, J.N., Stathatos, S.C. and Dai, W. (2014), “Automatically Detected Nonverbal Behavior Predicts Creativity in Collaborating Dyads”, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, R.W., Sawyer, J.E. and Griffin, R.W. (1993), “Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18 No. 2, available at: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1993.3997517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, L., Burgoon, J.K., Zhang, D. and Nunamaker, J.F. (2004), “Language dominance in interpersonal deception in computer-mediated communication”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access