No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Characterising the low-tech approach through a value-driven model
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 May 2024
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
In this article, we argue that the low-tech narrative redefined by a French low-tech movement in recent years can be considered as a legitimate research object for design research. Based on the French low-tech movement's literature, we present the definitions of the low-tech concept as an approach driven by principles and highlight two theorical limitations of this type of definition. Based on a value-sensitive design approach, we present transdisciplinary research results through a value-driven low-tech model and discussed its limitations and possible use as a tool for engineers.
- Type
- Industrial Design
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2024.
References
Béranger, A. (2022), “Médiatisation du phénomène low-tech”, presented at the Doctorales de la Société Française des Sciences de l'Information & de la Communication (SFSIC 2020.Google Scholar
Berlan, A. (2021), Terre et liberté. La quête d'autonomie contre le fantasme de délivrance - Aurélien Berlan, La lenteur.Google Scholar
Bernaud, W. (2021), Vers Une Démocratie Territoriale Low-tech, Mémoire de fin d’études MSc Strategy and Design for the Anthropocene Année 2020 - 2021, p. 81.Google Scholar
Bihouix, P., de Brosses, Baumes, Besse, E., Bonnifet, G., Darras, F., Désaunay, M., Gancille, T., et al, J.-M.. (2019), Vers des technologies sobres et résilientes - Pourquoi et comment développer l'innovation “low-tech” ?Google Scholar
Bihouix, P., (2020), The Age of Low Tech, 1st ed., Bristol University Press, https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv177tgng.Google Scholar
Bruyère, N., Geel, C. and Petit, V. (2023), Global Tools (1973-1975) - Eco-Design : Dé-projet & Low-Tech.Google Scholar
Carrey, J. and Lachaize, S. (2020), “La recherche scientifique en Low-Tech : définition, réflexions sur les pistes possibles, et illustration avec un projet de métallurgie solaire”, La Pensée écologique, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris cedex 14, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 7–7, https://dx.doi.org/10.3917/lpe.005.0007.Google Scholar
Colin, C. and Martin, A. (2023), “The user experience of low-techs: from user problems to design principles”, Vol. 18, pp. 68–85.Google Scholar
Decker, K.D. (2008), “About”, LOW←TECH MAGAZINE, available at: https://solar.low-techmagazine.com/about/ (accessed 17 November 2023).Google Scholar
Feenberg, A. and Feenberg, A. (2002), Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited, Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, C. (2020), “Pourquoi l'alternative low-tech tarde à se généraliser”, Usbek et RIca.Google Scholar
Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (2008), “‘Low-Tech’ Innovations”, Industry and Innovation, Routledge, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 19–43, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13662710701850691.Google Scholar
Kossoff, G. (2019), “Cosmopolitan Localism: The Planetary Networking of Everyday Life in Place”, Cuadernos Del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación, No. 73.Google Scholar
Martin, A., Gaultier, A. and Colin, C. (2022), “Cartographie du concept low-tech : guider la conception vers des techniques soutenables”, presented at the 56ème Congrès de la SELF, Vulnérabilités et risques émergents : penser et agir ensemble pour transformer durablement, p. 144.Google Scholar
Meyer, M. (2021), “Experimenting and documenting low tech”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Routledge, Vol. 33 No. 10, pp. 1147–1158, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1914834.Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I. (2013), “Translating Values into Design Requirements”, in Michelfelder, D.P., McCarthy, N. and Goldberg, D.E. (Eds.), Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 253–266, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7762-0_20.Google Scholar
Rittel, H.W.J. and Webber, M.M. (1973), “Dilemmas in a general theory of planning”, Policy Sciences, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 155–169, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, E.F. (1973), Small Is Beautiful - Une Société à La Mesure de l'homme, Points.Google Scholar
Varela, F.G., Maturana, H.R. and Uribe, R. (1974), “Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model”, Biosystems, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 187–196, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0303-2647(74)90031-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanguy, A., Carrière, L. and Laforest, V. (2023), “Low-tech approaches for sustainability: key principles from the literature and practice”, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 19 No. 1, p. 2170143, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2023.2170143.Google Scholar
Virenque, L. and Mossio, M. (2023), “What is Agency? A View from Autonomy Theory”, Biological Theory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press (MIT Press), https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13752-023-00441-5.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M.J. (n.d.). “Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Value (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Fall 2004 Edition)”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access