Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:04:50.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

BEYOND THE OVERVIEW EFFECT: A VIRTUAL REALITY EXPERIENCE FOR SUSTAINABILITY AWARENESS IN DECISION-MAKING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Giulia Wally Scurati ,
Nicolò Dozio ,
Francesco Ferrise  and
Marco Bertoni
Giulia Wally Scurati*
Affiliation:
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Department of Mechanical Engineering;
Nicolò Dozio
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano, Department of Mechanical Engineering
Francesco Ferrise
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano, Department of Mechanical Engineering
Marco Bertoni
Affiliation:
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Department of Mechanical Engineering;
*
Scurati, Giulia Wally, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Sweden, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The challenges of sustainable development require a consistent transformation of decision-making practices in society and in the industry. In this regard, Virtual Reality (VR) is an effective tool, providing experiences that are not accessible in the real world. The overview effect is a feeling of interconnectedness and responsibility towards our planet and its inhabitants described by astronauts after seeing the Earth during spaceflights. We present a VR application merging the overview effect with data visualization. We illustrate the design process and perform a pilot test to assess the emotions raised by the VR experience. Furthermore, we report feedback from design engineering and sustainability experts discussing the applications' potential in decision-making contexts, including product development processes.

Keywords

SustainabilityVirtual realityHuman behaviour in designDecision makingEmotional design
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 777 - 786
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Ahn, S. J., Bostick, J., Ogle, E., Nowak, K. L., McGillicuddy, K. T., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016). Experiencing nature: Embodying animals in immersive virtual environments increases inclusion of nature in self and involvement with nature. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(6), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnidge, M., Sherrill, L. A., Kim, B., Cooks, E., Deavours, D., Viehouser, M., …& Zhang, J. (2021). The Effects of Virtual Reality News on Learning about Climate Change. Mass Communication and Society, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1925300Google Scholar
Bassani, C., Vichi, F., Esposito, G., Montagnoli, M., Giusto, M., & Ianniello, A. (2021). Nitrogen dioxide reductions from satellite and surface observations during COVID-19 mitigation in Rome (Italy). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(18), 22981–23004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12141-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J., (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 25, 49–59. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9,arXiv:0005-7916(93)E0016-Z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caiado, R. G. G., Leal Filho, W., Quelhas, O. L. G., de Mattos Nascimento, D. L., & Ávila, L. V. (2018). A literature-based review on potentials and constraints in the implementation of the sustainable development goals. Journal of cleaner production, 198, 1276–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavagnaro, E., & Curiel, G. (2017). The three levels of sustainability. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351277969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chirico, A., Scurati, G. W., Maffi, C., Huang, S., Graziosi, S., Ferrise, F., & Gaggioli, A. (2021). Designing virtual environments for attitudes and behavioral change in plastic consumption: A comparison between concrete and numerical information. Virtual Reality, 25, 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00442-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, H. H. (2021). Creative Performance in Extreme Human Environments: Astronauts and Space. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 2362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EASA (2019), European aviation environmental report [online]. European Aviation Safety Agency. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/2019-aviation-environmental-report.pdf (accessed 08-11.2021).Google Scholar
Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 17, 124–129, https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0030377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ElHaffar, G., Durif, F., & Dubé, L. (2020). Towards closing the attitude-intention-behavior gap in green consumption: A narrative review of the literature and an overview of future research directions. Journal of cleaner production, 275, 122556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gürerk, Ö., & Kasulke, A. (2018). Does virtual reality increase charitable giving? an experimental study. An Experimental Study (October 8, 2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3072002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havenith, H. B., Cerfontaine, P., & Mreyen, A. S. (2019). How virtual reality can help visualise and assess geohazards. International Journal of Digital Earth, 12(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2017.1365960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, K., Garcia Martinez, G., Wadley, G., & Williams, K. (2020, December). Melbourne 2100: Dystopian Virtual Reality to provoke civic engagement with climate change. In 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 392–402). https://doi.org/10.1145/3441000.3441029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minocha, S., Tudor, A. D., & Tilling, S. (2017). Affordances of mobile virtual reality and their role in learning and teaching. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2017.44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quesnel, D., Stepanova, E. R., Aguilar, I. A., Pennefather, P., & Riecke, B. E. (2018, August). Creating AWE: artistic and scientific practices in research-based design for exploring a profound immersive installation. In 2018 IEEE Games, Entertainment, Media Conference (GEM) (pp. 1–207). IEEE. 10.1109/GEM.2018.8516463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scurati, G. W., & Ferrise, F. (2020). Looking Into a Future Which Hopefully Will Not Become Reality: How Computer Graphics Can Impact Our Behavior—A Study of the Potential of VR. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 40(5), 82–88. 10.1109/MCG.2020.3004276CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scurati, G. W., Bertoni, M., Graziosi, S., & Ferrise, F. (2021). Exploring the Use of Virtual Reality to Support Environmentally Sustainable Behavior: A Framework to Design Experiences. Sustainability, 13(2), 943. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepanova, E. R., Quesnel, D., & Riecke, B. E. (2019). Space—a virtual frontier: how to design and evaluate a virtual reality experience of the overview effect. Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 6, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2019.00007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Limpt-Broers, H. A. T., Postma, M., & Louwerse, M. M. (2020). Creating ambassadors of planet earth: the overview effect in K12 education. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2548. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.540996CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zelenski, J. M., & Desrochers, J. E. (2021). Can positive and self-transcendent emotions promote pro-environmental behavior?. Current Opinion in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar