Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:13:56.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Automatic evaluation of the misplacement risk during manual assembly based on a CAD design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Alexander De Cock ,
Ncamisile Khanyile  and
Bieke Decraemer
Alexander De Cock
Affiliation:
Flanders Make, Belgium
Ncamisile Khanyile
Affiliation:
Flanders Make, Belgium
Bieke Decraemer*
Affiliation:
Flanders Make, Belgium
*
[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In HMLV manufacturing, assembly mistakes by operators are common due to the ever increasing product variability and complexity. If mistakes can be detected early-on in the design process, product designers can reduce the possibility for mistakes. We present an algorithm to automatically detect and evaluate potential misplacements of parts that need to be fastened. Evaluation starts from a product CAD and returns the risk of misplacement as well as visual feedback on possible misplacements. An implementation with FreeCAD of our algorithm is illustrated on different use cases.

Keywords

design for x (DfX)computer-aided design (CAD)design analysisdesign for assemblypoka yoke
Type
Design Methods and Tools
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 533 - 542
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Boothroyd, G., Dewhurst, P. and Knight, W.A. (2011), Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly, Third Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420089288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boothroyd Dewhurst, Inc. (2023) DFMA (Version 2023A) [Computer program]. Boothroyd Dewhurst, Inc., East Greenwich, USA.Google Scholar
DFA-Tools Ltd (2017) DFA-Tool (Version 7.1) [Computer program]. DFA-Tools Ltd, Vantaa, Finland.Google Scholar
Eiriksdottir, E. and Catrambone, R. (2011), “Procedural Instructions, Principles, and Examples: How to Structure Instructions for Procedural Tasks to Enhance Performance, Learning, and Transfer”, Human Factors, Vol. 53 No. 6, pp. 749–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811419154CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eskilander, S. (2001), Design for Automatic Assembly – A Method for Product Design: DFA2 [PhD Thesis], Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Gors, D., Put, J., Vanherle, B., Witters, M. and Luyten, K. (2021), “Semi-automatic extraction of digital work instructions from CAD models”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 97, pp. 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Technologies Ltd, HCL (2023) DFMPro [Computer program]. HCL Technologies Ltd, Mumbai, India.Google Scholar
Hollnagel, E. (2012), “Coping with complexity: Past, present and future”, Cognition, Technology and Work, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0202-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, S.J., Zhu, X., Wang, H. and Koren, Y. (2008), “Product variety and manufacturing complexity in assembly systems and supply chains”, CIRP Annals, Vol. 57 No. 1, pp. 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibrahim, A.D., Hussein, H.M.A. and Abdelwahab, S.A. (2021), “Automatic Feature Recognition of Cross Holes in Hollow Cylinders”, J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C, Vol. 102 No. 2, pp. 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-020-00649-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarevic, M., Mandic, J., Sremcev, N., Vukelic, D. and Debevec, M. (2019), “A systematic literature review of poka-yoke and novel approach to theoretical aspects”, Strojniski Vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 65 No. 7–8, pp. 454–467. https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2019.6056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leder, R., Stern, H. and Freitag, M. (2022), “Towards design guidance for the digitalisation of work instructions by focusing on technological possibilities and industrial requirements”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 109, pp. 466–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W., Agrawala, M., Curless, B. and Salesin, D. (2008), “Automated generation of interactive 3D exploded view diagrams”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1145/1360612.1360700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melckenbeeck, I., Burggraeve, S., Van Doninck, B., Vancraen, J. and Rosich, A. (2020), “Optimal assembly sequence based on design for assembly (DFA) rules”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 91, pp. 646–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmentier, D.D., Van Acker, B.B., Detand, J. and Saldien, J. (2020), “Design for assembly meaning: a framework for designers to design products that support operator cognition during the assembly process”, Cognition, Technology and Work, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00588-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peruzzini, M., Grandi, F. and Pellicciari, M. (2020), “Exploring the potential of Operator 4.0 interface and monitoring”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 139, p. 105600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimminger, S., Kurschl, W., Panholzer, L. and Schönböck, J. (2021), “Exploring the Learnability of Assembly Tasks Using Digital Work Instructions in a Smart Factory”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 104, pp. 696–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slyadnev, S., Malyshev, A., Voevodin, A. and Turlapov, V. (2020), “On the Role of Graph Theory Apparatus in a CAD Modeling Kernel”, Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Computer Graphics and Machine Vision (GraphiCon 2020). https://doi.org/10.51130/graphicon-2020-2-3-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solme, AB (2015) AVIX DFX (Version 4.6.5) [Computer program]. Solme AB, Göteburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
Tariki, K., Kiyokawa, T., Nagatani, T., Takamatsu, J. and Ogasawara, T. (2021), “Generating complex assembly sequences from 3D CAD models considering insertion relations”, Advanced Robotics, Vol. 35 No. 6, pp. 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2020.1863258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The FreeCAD Team (2023) FreeCAD (Version 0.21.1) [Computer program].Google Scholar
Widjajanto, S., Purba, H.H. and Jaqin, S.C. (2020), “Novel poka-yoke approaching toward industry-4.0: A literature review”, Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 65–83. https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta20303065wGoogle Scholar
Yu, J. and Zhang, J. (2017), “Hierarchical exploded view generation based on recursive assembly sequence planning”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 93 No. 1–4, pp. 1207–1228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0414-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zogopoulos, V., Geurts, E., Gors, D. and Kauffmann, S. (2022), “Authoring Tool for Automatic Generation of Augmented Reality Instruction Sequence for Manual Operations”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 106, pp. 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.02.159CrossRefGoogle Scholar