Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:52:25.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AN EXPLORATION OF THE ROLE OF CREATIVITY IN CROWDFUNDING PRODUCT DESIGN PROJECTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Ji Han ,
Pingfei Jiang ,
Min Hua  and
Peter R. N Childs
Ji Han*
Affiliation:
University of Exeter;
Pingfei Jiang
Affiliation:
Kingston University London;
Min Hua
Affiliation:
Shanghai Jiao Tong University;
Peter R. N Childs
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
*
Han, Ji, University of Exeter, United Kingdom, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Crowdfunding is becoming increasingly popular for funding projects, particularly in the domain of product design, by asking a large group of people. Previous studies have indicated that creativity plays a significant role in product design and is considered an important factor of success for new product design and development. However, these studies have not explicitly explored the role of creativity in crowdfunding product design projects. This paper investigates this issue by conducting a case study employing expert evaluations of selected successful and unsuccessful crowdfunding product design project samples. The results of the study show there is a positive relationship between the creativity of a product and the success of its crowdfunding campaign. Therefore, creativity can be considered a success factor of crowdfunding. The study also suggests creative products, especially useful ones, might have more potential to attract people's willingness to fund them. This paper has contributed to the research on design, creativity, product design and development, and funding business models. Most importantly, this paper has raised the significance of creativity in design and business.

Keywords

CreativityInnovationBusiness models and considerationsCrowdfundingProduct design
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 535 - 544
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Achiche, S., Appio, F.P., McAloone, T.C. and Di Minin, A. (2013), “Fuzzy decision support for tools selection in the core front end activities of new product development”, Research in Engineering Design, 24(1), 1–18. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-012-0130-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altshuller, G.S. (1984), Creativity as an exact science: the theory of the solution of inventive problems, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, The Netherland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T.M. (1983), The Social Psychology of Creativity, Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boden, M.A. (2004), The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms, Routledge, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borrero-Domínguez, C., Cordón-Lagares, E. and Hernández-Garrido, R. (2020), “Analysis of success factors in crowdfunding projects based on rewards: A way to obtain financing for socially committed projects”, Heliyon, 6(4), e03744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calic, G. and Mosakowski, E. (2016), “Kicking Off Social Entrepreneurship: How A Sustainability Orientation Influences Crowdfunding Success”, Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), 738–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charyton, C. and Merrill, J.A. (2009), “Assessing General Creativity and Creative Engineering Design in First Year Engineering Students”, Journal of Engineering Education, 98(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01013.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, P. and Fountain, R. (2011), “Commercivity”, in DS 69: Proceedings of E&PDE 2011, the 13th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, London, UK, 08.-09.09. 2011.Google Scholar
Childs, P., Han, J., Chen, L., Jiang, P., Wang, P., Park, D., Yin, Y., Dieckmann, E. and Vilanova, I. (2022), “The Creativity Diamond - A Framework to Aid Creativity”, Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chitsazan, H. and Bagheri, A. (2019), “Factors Affecting Crowdfunding Success: A Systematic Analysis of the Empirical Studies”, in 2019 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Knowledge Economy (ICCIKE), 11-12 Dec. 2019, 20–24. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIKE47802.2019.9004279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, I. and Shu, L.H. (2012), “Investigating effects of oppositely related semantic stimuli on design concept creativity”, Journal of Engineering Design, 23(4), 271–296. http://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2011.603298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crilly, N. and Moroşanu Firth, R. (2019), “Creativity and fixation in the real world: Three case studies of invention, design and innovation”, Design Studies, 64, 169–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropley, D.H. and Kaufman, J.C. (2019), “The siren song of aesthetics? Domain differences and creativity in engineering and design”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 233(2), 451–464. http://doi.org/10.1177/0954406218778311.Google Scholar
Dancey, C.P. and Reidy, J. (2007), Statistics without maths for psychology, Pearson education, Harlow.Google Scholar
De Bono, E. (2017), Six Thinking Hats: The multi-million bestselling guide to running better meetings and making faster decisions, Penguin, UK.Google Scholar
Fiorineschi, L. and Rotini, F. (2021), “Novelty metrics in engineering design”, Journal of Engineering Design, 32(11), 590–620, https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2021.1928024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, H. and Schaefer, D. (2017), “Guidelines for Successful Crowdfunding”, Procedia CIRP, 60, 398–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.02.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J., Forbes, H. and Schaefer, D. (2021a), “An exploration of how creativity, functionality, and aesthetics are related in design”, Research in Engineering Design, 32(3), 289–307. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-021-00366-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J., Sarica, S., Shi, F. and Luo, J. (2021b), “Semantic Networks for Engineering Design: State of the Art and Future Directions”, Journal of Mechanical Design, 144(2). http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052148.Google Scholar
Han, J., Park, D., Hua, M., and Childs, P.R.N. (2021c), “Is group work beneficial for producing creative designs in STEM design education?”, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32, 2801–2826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09709-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J., Shi, F., Chen, L. and Childs, P.R.N. (2018a), “A computational tool for creative idea generation based on analogical reasoning and ontology”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 32(4), 462–477. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060418000082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J., Shi, F., Park, D., Chen, L. and Childs, P. (2018b), “The conceptual distances between ideas in combinational creativity”, in DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 1857–1866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölttä-Otto, K., Otto, K., Song, C., Luo, J., Li, T., Seepersad, C.C. and Seering, W. (2018), “The Characteristics of Innovative, Mechanical Products—10 Years Later”, Journal of Mechanical Design, 140(8). http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, J.-A. and Siering, M. (2015), “Crowdfunding success factors: The characteristics of successfully funded projects on crowdfunding platforms”, in the 23rd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2015), Muenster, Germany.Google Scholar
Kunz, M.M., Bretschneider, U., Erler, M. and Leimeister, J.M. (2017), “An empirical investigation of signaling in reward-based crowdfunding”, Electronic Commerce Research, 17(3), 425–461. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-016-9249-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, P.-Y. and Gerber, E. (2012), “Design principles: crowdfunding as a creativity support tool”, in CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin, Texas, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, 1601–1606. http://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2223679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linsey, J.S., Markman, A.B. and Wood, K.L. (2012), “Design by Analogy: A Study of the WordTree Method for Problem Re-Representation”, Journal of Mechanical Design, 134(4). http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, J. (2022), “Data-Driven Innovation: What is it?”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1-7. http://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3145231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, J., Sarica, S. and Wood, K.L. (2021), “Guiding data-driven design ideation by knowledge distance”, Knowledge-Based Systems, 218, 106873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, L. and Wilson, N. (2017), “Defining Creativity with Discovery”, Creativity Research Journal, 29(4), 417–425. http://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1376543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, C. (2022), “24 Critical Crowdfunding Statistics” [online], available from: https://www.zippia.com/advice/crowdfunding-statistics/. [Accessed 27th October 2022]Google Scholar
Oman, S.K., Tumer, I.Y., Wood, K. and Seepersad, C. (2013), “A comparison of creativity and innovation metrics and sample validation through in-class design projects”, Research in Engineering Design, 24(1), 65–92. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-012-0138-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oo, P.P., Allison, T.H., Sahaym, A. and Juasrikul, S. (2019), “User entrepreneurs’ multiple identities and crowdfunding performance: Effects through product innovativeness, perceived passion, and need similarity”, Journal of Business Venturing, 34(5), 105895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.08.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, A.F. (1963), Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking, 3 rd ed., Charles Scribner's Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Sarica, S., Han, J. and Luo, J. (2023), “Design representation as semantic networks”, Computers in Industry, 144, 103791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarica, S., Luo, J. and Wood, K.L. (2020), “TechNet: Technology semantic network based on patent data”, Expert Systems with Applications, 142, 112995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarica, S., Song, B., Luo, J. and Wood, K.L. (2021), “Idea generation with Technology Semantic Network”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 35(3), 265–283. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060421000020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, P. and Chakrabarti, A. (2011), “Assessing design creativity”, Design Studies, 32(4), 348–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, F., Chen, L., Han, J. and Childs, P. (2017), “A Data-Driven Text Mining and Semantic Network Analysis for Design Information Retrieval”, Journal of Mechanical Design, 139(11). http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, C., Luo, J., Hölttä-Otto, K., Seering, W. and Otto, K. (2022), “Crowdfunding for Design Innovation: Prediction Model With Critical Factors”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(4), 1565–1576, http://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3001764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, V., Song, B., Luo, J., Subburaj, K., Elara, M.R., Blessing, L. and Wood, K. (2018), “Does Analogical Distance Affect Performance of Ideation?”, Journal of Mechanical Design, 140(7). http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starkey, E.M., Menold, J. and Miller, S.R. (2019), “When Are Designers Willing to Take Risks? How Concept Creativity and Prototype Fidelity Influence Perceived Risk”, Journal of Mechanical Design, 141(3). http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toh, C. and Miller, S.R. (2019), “Does the Preferences for Creativity Scale Predict Engineering Students’ Ability to Generate and Select Creative Design Alternatives?”, Journal of Mechanical Design, 141(6). http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H.-H. and Chan, J.-H. (2011), “An Approach to Measuring Metaphoricity of Creative Design”, in Taura, T. and Nagai, Y., eds., Design Creativity 2010, London, 2011, 89–96, Springer, London.Google Scholar
Wang, W., Chen, W., Zhu, K. and Wang, H. (2020), “Emphasizing the entrepreneur or the idea? The impact of text content emphasis on investment decisions in crowdfunding”, Decision Support Systems, 136, 113341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Y.M., Hong, J. and Tellis, G.J. (2022), “Machine Learning for Creativity: Using Similarity Networks to Design Better Crowdfunding Projects”, Journal of Marketing, 86(2), 87–104. http://doi.org/10.1177/00222429211005481CrossRefGoogle Scholar