No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Additive Manufacturing Conformity – A Practical View
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 May 2022
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
With the dissemination of additive manufacturing (AM), numerous methods have emerged to support the design process. One possibility is to improve functional solutions through AM-conformal design. Literature-based criteria for the assessment of AM-conformity already exist. Within our study, we address the gap in criteria between a theoretical perspective and a practitioner's perspective. To this end, we first explain the application of the criteria through a use case and conduct an evaluation in an industrial environment adding practitioner's criteria to enable the assessment of AM-conformity.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2022.
References
Baumann, F. and Roller, D. (2017), “Overview of German Additive Manufacturing Companies”, Data, MDPI AG, Vol. 2 No. 3, article number 23. 10.3390/data2030023Google Scholar
Booth, J.W., Alperovich, J., Chawla, P., Ma, J., Reid, T.N. and Ramani, K. (2017), “The Design for Additive Manufacturing Worksheet”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 139 No. 10, article number 100904. 10.1115/1.4037251Google Scholar
Fu, K.K., Yang, M.C. and Wood, K.L. (2016), “Design Principles: Literature Review, Analysis, and Future Directions”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 138 No. 10, article number 101103. 10.1115/1.4034105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrelts, E., Roth, D., and Binz, H. (2021), “Concept of a design catalog for the function-integrated design of additively manufactured components”, Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung SSP 2021, Stuttgart, Germany, Mai 20, 2021.Google Scholar
Jensen, B.D. and Howell, L.L. (2002), “The modeling of cross-axis flexural pivots”, Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 37 No. 5, pp. 461–476. 10.1016/S0094-114X(02)00007-1Google Scholar
Lauff, C.A., Perez, K.B., Camburn, B.A. and Wood, K.L. (2019), “Design Principle Cards: Toolset to Support Innovations With Additive Manufacturing”, Proceedings of the ASME 2019, International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Anaheim, CA, USA, August 18-21, 2019, article number: DETC2019-97231. 10.1115/DETC2019-97231Google Scholar
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. and Grote, K.-H. (2007), Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer, London. 10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2Google Scholar
Rosen, D.W. (2014), “Research supporting principles for design for additive manufacturing”, Virtual and Physical Prototyping, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 225–232. 10.1080/17452759.2014.951530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tüzün, G.-J., Garrelts, E., Roth, D., Binz, H. (2021), “Derivation of Criteria for Assessing Solution Principles conformal for Additive Manufacturing”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21), Gothenburg, Sweden, August 16-20, 2021, pp. 923–932. 10.1017/pds.2021.92Google Scholar
Valjak, F., Bojčetić, N. and Lukić, M. (2018), “Design for Additive Manufacturing: Mapping of product functions”, Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 / 15th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 21-24, 2018, The Design Society, pp. 1369–1380. 10.21278/idc.2018.0364Google Scholar
VDI (1993), VDI 2221:1993: Systematic approach to the development and design of technical systems and products, Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, Berlin.Google Scholar
Watschke, H., Kuschmitz, S., Heubach, J., Lehne, G. and Vietor, T. (2019) “A Methodical Approach to Support Conceptual Design for Multi-Material Additive Manufacturing”, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), Delft, The Netherlands, August 5-8, 2019, pp. 659–668. 10.1017/dsi.2019.70Google Scholar
Weiss, F. (2019), Untersuchung des Entwicklungsprozesses für additiv gefertigte Bauteile mittels Bereitstellung einer elementaren Informationsstruktur, [PhD Thesis], University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Weiss, F., Binz, H. and Roth, D. (2016), “Conception of a design catalogue for the development of functionalities with additive manufacturing”, Proceedings of NordDesign 2016, Vol. 2, Trondheim, Norway, August 10-12, 2016, pp. 2–11.Google Scholar
Weiss, F., Ahlgrimm, L., Binz, H. and Roth, D. (2017a), “Prozess zur computergestützten Anpassung AM-gerechter Lösungsprinzipien an produktspezifische Randbedingungen”, Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung SSP 2017, Stuttgart, Germany, June 29, 2017.Google Scholar
Weiss, F., Janny, B., Binz, H., Maier, T. and Roth, D. (2017b), “ Using additive manufacturing to design adaptive user interfaces – Lessons learned from a DfAM process”, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17), Vol. 5, Vancouver, Canada, August 21-25, 2017, pp. 101–110.Google Scholar
Yang, S. and Zhao, Y.F. (2016), “Conceptual design for assembly in the context of additive manufacturing”, Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium – An Additive Manufacturing Conference, University of Texas at Austin, USA, August 8-10, 2016, pp. 1932–1944.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Bernard, A., Gupta, R.G. and Harik, R. (2014), “ Evaluating the Design for Additive Manufacturing: A Process Planning Perspective”, Procedia CIRP Volume 21 / 24th CIRP Design Conference, Milano, Italy, April 14-16, 2016, Elsevier B.V., pp. 144–150. 10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.179Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access