Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:00:22.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVERSE-ARCHITECTING APPROACH FOR SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE MODELS

Part of: Systems Engineering and Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

R. Pluhnau ,
S. G. Kunnen ,
D. Adamenko  and
A. Nagarajah
R. Pluhnau*
Affiliation:
University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
S. G. Kunnen
Affiliation:
University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
D. Adamenko
Affiliation:
University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
A. Nagarajah
Affiliation:
University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
*
*[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For an efficient product family development an abstraction of concrete product variants is necessary in order to recognize and systematically describe characteristic properties of a variant. System architecture models represent a possibility for the systematic description of the product variety. The structure of architecture models for existing product families resembles a reverse engineering process, in which products have to be analyzed on their structures. This paper describes a reverse engineering approach for building up system architecture models as basis for developing product families.

Keywords

systems engineering (SE)systematic approachproduct architecture
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 2355 - 2364
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Albers, A. et al. (2016), “iPeM – Integrated Product Engineering Model in Context of Product Generation Engineering”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50, pp. 100–105.10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniilidis, C. (2017), “Planungsleitfaden für die systematische Analyse- und Verbesserung von Produktarchitekturen, Planning guide for the systematic analysis and improvement of product architectures”.Google Scholar
Walden, D., D. et al. (2015), “INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities”.Google Scholar
Eigner, M., Koch, W. and Muggeo, C. (2017), “Modellbasierter Entwicklungsprozess cybertronischer Systeme. Model-based development process of cybertronic systems”, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-662-55124-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldhusen, J. and Grote, K.-H. (2013), Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre, Design Theory, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fixson, S.K. (2005), “Product architecture assessment: a tool to link product, process, and supply chain design decisions”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 23 No. 3-4, pp. 345–369.10.1016/j.jom.2004.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gausemeier, J.E.A. (2011), “Modellbasierte Konzipierung eines hybriden Energiespeichersystems für ein autonomes Schienenfahrzeug, Model-based design of a hybrid energy storage system for an autonomous rail vehicle”, Tag des Systems Engineering.Google Scholar
INCOSE (2014), “A World in Motion - Systems Engineering Vision 2025”.Google Scholar
ISO/IEC (2007), 42010:2007 Systems and software engineering - Recommended practice for architectural description of software-intense systems.Google Scholar
Kleiner, S. (2012), “Entwerfen und Entwickeln mit Systems Engineering auf Basis des RFLP-Ansatzes in V6, Design and development with Systems Engineering based on the RFLP approach in V6”, Entwerfen, Entwickeln, Erleben.Google Scholar
Phillips, C. (2018), “The Big Happy Family of System Architecture Approaches”.Google Scholar
Stone, R.B. (2000), “A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures”, Design Studies, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 5–31.10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00003-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, K. (1995), “The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm”, Research Policy, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 419–440.10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. (2000), Product design and development, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York, NY.Google Scholar
van Wie, M.J. (2002), “Designing Product Architecture: A Systematic Method”.Google Scholar
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI) (2004), Entwicklungsmethodik für mechatronische Systeme (VDI 2206): Design methodology for mechatronic systems, VDI.Google Scholar
Weilkiens, T. et al. (2016), Model-based system architecture, Wiley series in systems engineering and management, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey.Google Scholar