Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:06:47.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RE-DESIGN OF ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED SPARE PARTS BASED ON FEATURES CLASSIFICATION

Part of: Design Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

J. Montero ,
S. Weber ,
M. Bleckmann  and
K. Paetzold
J. Montero*
Affiliation:
Bundeswehr University Munich, Germany Bundeswehr Research Institute for Materials, Fuels and Lubricants, Germany
S. Weber
Affiliation:
Bundeswehr University Munich, Germany Bundeswehr Research Institute for Materials, Fuels and Lubricants, Germany
M. Bleckmann
Affiliation:
Bundeswehr Research Institute for Materials, Fuels and Lubricants, Germany
K. Paetzold
Affiliation:
Bundeswehr University Munich, Germany
*
*[email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Additive Manufacturing is doing its first steps in the production of spare parts. Usually the spares belong to legacy systems, and the tooling to produce them is no longer available. Re-designing spares that are designed for a previous industry mindset can be sometimes challenging. In this study a rather classic design approach is compared to a functional driven approach. Four case studies from different clients are reported, remarking the benefits and drawbacks of using design for additive manufacturing practices in Laser Powder Bed Fusion.

Keywords

additive manufacturingcase studydesign for x (DfX)laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF)spare parts
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 1007 - 1016
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Adam, G.A.O. and Zimmer, D. (2015), “On design for additive manufacturing: evaluating geometrical limitations”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 662–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, J., Sharpe, C. and Seepersad, C.C. (2019), “Powder bed fusion metrology for additive manufacturing design guidance”, Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 25, pp. 239–251.10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
I, ASTM. (2015), “ASTM52900-15 Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing—General Principles—Terminology”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.Google Scholar
Atzberger, A. et al. (2018), “Characteristics of a metal additive manufacturing process for the production of spare parts”, Symposium on Design for X, Vol. 29, pp. 83–94.Google Scholar
Ballardini, R.M., Flores Ituarte, I. and Pei, E. (2018), “Printing spare parts through additive manufacturing: legal and digital business challenges”, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 958–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neal, B. (2019), “Big Push in Germany to Enable 3D Printing in Automotive Industry”. 3DPrint.Com | The Voice of 3D Printing/Additive Manufacturing, 17 April, available at: https://3dprint.com/241657/germany-big-push-bmbf-ibam-instill-3d-printing-am-processes-automotive-industry/ (accessed 15 November 2019).Google Scholar
Booth, J.W. et al. (2017), “The Design for Additive Manufacturing Worksheet”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 139 No. 10, p. 100904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brigden, K. (2016), “Adaptation for AM versus Design for AM”, presented at the Additive Manufacturing Users Group, St. Louis, 25 April, available at: https://www.slideshare.net/KevinBrigden/adaptation-for-am-versus-design-for-am (accessed 13 November 2019).Google Scholar
F42 Committee. (n.d.). “Guidelines for Design for Additive Manufacturing”, ASTM International, available at: https://doi.org/10.1520/F3154-18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geissbauer, R., Wunderlin, J. and Lehr, J. (2017), Partner, PwC Strategy & Germany.Google Scholar
Kempen, K. et al. (2015), “Processing AlSi10Mg by selective laser melting: parameter optimisation and material characterisation”, Materials Science and Technology, Vol. 31 No. 8, pp. 917–923.10.1179/1743284714Y.0000000702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khajavi, S.H., Partanen, J. and Holmström, J. (2014), “Additive manufacturing in the spare parts supply chain”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 65 No. 1, pp. 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantyla, M. (1990), “A modeling system for top-down design of assembled products”, IBM Journal of Research and Development, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 636–659.10.1147/rd.345.0636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiners, W., Wissenbach, K. and Gasser, A. (1997), Selective Laser Sintering at Melting Temperature, Aachen, 27 October.Google Scholar
Montero, J. et al. (2019), “Anwendung agiler Entwicklungsprinzipien für die Herstel-lung von Ersatzteilen mit additiven Fertigungsverfahren”, Konstruktion für die Additive Fertigung., 2019th ed.10.1007/978-3-662-59058-4_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montero, J. et al. (2018), “Re-Design and Re-Manufacturing of Discontinued Spare Parts Implementing Additive Manufacturing in the Military Field”, presented at the 15th International Design Conference, pp. 1269–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montero, J., Weber, S. and Bleckmann, M. (2019), “Spare part production in remote locations through Additive Manufacturing enhanced by agile development principles”, p. 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, L.A., Ashcroft, I.A. and Wildman, R.D. (2019), “Geometrical effects on residual stress in selective laser melting”, Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 25, pp. 166–175.10.1016/j.addma.2018.09.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponche, R. et al. (2014), “A novel methodology of design for Additive Manufacturing applied to Additive Laser Manufacturing process”, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibold, M. (2018), “Why we drive the industrialization of Additive Manufacturing”, Linked In, 20 September, p. 5.Google Scholar
Shellabear, M. and Nyrhilä, O. (2004), “DMLS – Development History and State of the Art”, LANE 2004 Conference, presented at the LANE 2004, Erlangen, Germany, p. 12.Google Scholar
Thomas, D.S. and Gilbert, S.W. (2014), Costs and Cost Effectiveness of Additive Manufacturing, No. NIST SP 1176, National Institute of Standards and Technology, p. NIST SP 1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M.K. et al. (2016), “Design for Additive Manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints”, CIRP Annals, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 737–760.10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohlers Associates. (2019), Wohlers Report 2019: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing State of the Industry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar