Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:35:29.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IMPRO: IMMERSIVE PROTOTYPING IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGNERS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

S. Stadler*
Affiliation:
TUMCREATE Ltd, Singapore
H. Cornet
Affiliation:
TUMCREATE Ltd, Singapore
D. Mazeas
Affiliation:
TUMCREATE Ltd, Singapore
J.-R. Chardonnet
Affiliation:
Arts et Métiers ParisTech, France
F. Frenkler
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Computer-Aided Design (CAD) constitutes an important tool for industrial designers. Similarly, Virtual Reality (VR) has the capability to revolutionize how designers work with its increased sense of scale and perspective. However, existing VR CAD applications are limited in terms of functionality and intuitive control. Based on a comparison of VR CAD applications, ImPro, a new application for immersive prototyping for industrial designers was developed. The user evaluations and comparisons show that ImPro offers increased usability, functionality, and suitability for industrial designers.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Akca, E. (2017), “Development of Computer-Aided Industrial Design Technology”, Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN), Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 124127. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v5i2.86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arora, R. et al. (2017), “Experimental Evaluation of Sketching on Surfaces in VR”, Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ‘17, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), Denver. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025474Google Scholar
Autodesk (2019), 3ds max - 3d modeling and rendering software for design visualization, games, and animation, [online] Available at: https://www.autodesk.com/products/3ds-max/overview (accessed 7.10.2019).Google Scholar
Berg, L.P. and Vance, J.M. (2016), “Industry use of virtual reality in product design and manufacturing: a survey”, Virtual Reality, Vol. 21 No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-016-0293-9Google Scholar
Bishop, I.D., Wherrett, J.A.R. and Miller, D.R. (2001), “Assessment of path choices on a country walk using a virtual environment”, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 52 No. 4, pp. 225237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00118-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boothroyd, G. (1994), “Product design for manufacture and assembly”, Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 26 No. 7, pp. 505520. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(94)90082-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooke, J. (1996), “SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale”, In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B. and McClelland, A.L. (Eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry, Taylor & Francis, London.Google Scholar
Cambridge Dictionary (2014), Virtual Reality, [online] Cambridge University Press, Available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/de/worterbuch/englisch/virtual-reality?q=Virtual+Reality (accessed 26.01.2019).Google Scholar
Cross, N. (2006), Designerly ways of knowing, Designerly Ways of Knowing, Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-301-9Google Scholar
Cross, N. (1999), “Design Research: A Disciplined Conversation”, Design Issues, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deb, S. et al. (2017), “Efficacy of virtual reality in pedestrian safety research”, Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 65, pp. 449460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.03.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flyingshapes (2019), Flyingshapes, [online] Available at: https://www.flyingshapes.com/ (accessed 29.08.2019).Google Scholar
Freeman, I.J., Salmon, J.L. and Coburn, J.Q. (2017), “CAD Integration in Virtual Reality Design Reviews for Improved Engineering Model Interaction”, Proceedings of the ASME 2016 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, ASME, Phoenix. https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2016-66948Google Scholar
Google (2017), Google Blocks, [online] Available at: https://vr.google.com/blocks/ (accessed 29.08. 2019).Google Scholar
Gravity Sketch (2017), Gravity Sketch, [online] Available at: https://www.gravitysketch.com/ (accessed 29.08.2019).Google Scholar
Heufler, G. (2004), Design Basics - From Ideas to Products, Niggli Verlag AG, Zürich.Google Scholar
Hirsch, S. (2014), Gestaltung und Umbruch - Industrie Design als Mittel sozioökonomischer Wertschöpfung, Diplomica Verlag, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Keeley, D. (2018), The use of Virtual Reality Sketching in the conceptual stages of Product Design, [Department of Design & Engineering], Bournemouth University.Google Scholar
Microsoft (2019), Maquette, [online] Available at: https://www.maquette.ms/ (accessed 29.08.2019).Google Scholar
Mihelj, M., Novak, D. and Beguš, S. (2013) Virtual Reality Technology and Applications, Springer Science+Business Media, Dodrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6910-6.Google Scholar
Mindesk (2019) Mindesk. [online] Available at: https://mindeskvr.com/ (accessed 29.08. 2019).Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. and Molich, R. (1990), “Heuristic Evaluation of User Interfaces”, Proceedings of the 1990 CHI Conference on Empowering People - CHI’90, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), Seattle. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4526(93)90674-UGoogle Scholar
Ottosson, S. (2002), “Virtual reality in the product development process”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 159172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820210129823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polson, P.G. et al. (1992), “Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 741773. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7373(92)90039-NCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhinoceros (2019), Rhinoceros, [online] Available at: https://www.rhino3d.com/ (accessed 7.10.2019).Google Scholar
Rieuf, V. and Bouchard, C. (2017), “Emotional activity in early immersive design: Sketches and moodboards in virtual reality”, Design Studies, Vol. 48, pp. 4375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, J. and Chisnell, D. (2008), Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests, Wiley Publishing, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Stadler, S., Cornet, H. and Frenkler, F. (2019), “A Study in Virtual Reality on (Non -) Gamers, Attitudes and Behaviors”, Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces, IEEE, Osaka. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8797750Google Scholar
Stadler, S. et al. (2019), “A Tool, not a Toy: Using Virtual Reality to Evaluate the Communication Between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians”, In: tom Dieck, M.C. and Jung, T.H. (Eds.), Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham.Google Scholar
Tovey, M. (1989), “Drawing and CAD in industrial design”, Design Studies, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 2439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(89)90022-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendrich, R.E. (2010), “Raw shaping form finding: Tacit tangible CAD”, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 505531. https://doi.org/10.3722/cadaps.2010.505-531CrossRefGoogle Scholar