Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-g4kps Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T10:38:00.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulated ammonia emission figures from UK suckler beef production systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

J. J. Hyslop
J. J. Hyslop*
Affiliation:
SAC Ltd, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, United Kingdom
*
Email:[email protected]
Get access

Extract

In line with international treaty obligations, UK Government policy seeks to reduce ammonia (NH3) emissions from livestock production systems. For suckler beef production systems NH3 release is principally associated with cattle grazing, emissions during winter housing, storage and management of animal manures and spreading of both animal manures and artificial fertilisers on land. The objective of this simulation exercise was to simulate the NH3 emissions associated with a range of suckler beef production systems potentially available to current and future UK beef producers.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2008 , 2008 , pp. 63
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Misselbrook, T.H., Van der Weedenm, T.J., Pain, B.F., Jarvis, S.C., Chambers, B.J., Smith, K.A., Phillips, V.R. and Demmers, T.G.M. 2000. Ammonia emission factors for UK agriculture. Atmospheric Environment, 34: 871–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misselbrook, T.H. 2003. Updating the inventory of ammonia emissions from UK agriculture for the years 2000 and 2001. Report to Defra (Project No: AM0113). IGER, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB.Google Scholar
Roughsedge, T; Amer, P.R., and Simm, G. 2003. A bio-economic model for the evaluation of breeds and mating systems in beef production enterprises. Animal Science, 77: 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar