Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T17:26:27.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The qualitative assessment of pig behaviour using Repertory Grid Technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

D. Grajfoner ,
F. Wemelsfelder  and
E. Austin
D. Grajfoner
Affiliation:
The University of Edinburgh, The Department of Psychology, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, Scotland, U.K.
F. Wemelsfelder
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Animal Biology Division, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PH, Scotland, U.K.
E. Austin
Affiliation:
The University of Edinburgh, The Department of Psychology, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, Scotland, U.K.
Get access

Extract

Most studies which provide qualitative assessments of animal behaviour use prefixed lists of adjectives (e.g. shy, bold, interested). However,Wemelsfelder et al. (2000, 2001), using Free-Choice-Profiling (FCP) methodology, allowed observers to develop their own descriptors for scoring pigs, and found this method to be highly reliable and repeatable. Repertory grid technique (RGT) is a frequently used method in human psychology and resembles FCP. Recently RTG has also been applied to assess personality in chimpanzees (Dutton et al., 1997). The purpose of the present study was to apply RGT to pigs and to correlate obtained pig scores with those previously obtained through FCP.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2002 , 2002 , pp. 67
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dutton, D M, Clark, R and Dickins, D W 1997 Personality in captive chimpanzees: use of a novel rating procedure. International Journal of Primatology 18: 539–552.Google Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F., Hunter, E. A., Mendl, M. T. and Lawrence, A. B. (2000). The spontaneous qualitative assessment of behavioural expressions in pigs: first explorations of a novel methodology for integrative animal welfare measurement. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 67: 193–215.Google Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F., Hunter, E. A., Mendl, M. T. and Lawrence, A. B. (2001). Assessing the “whole animal”: a free choice profiling approach. Animal Behaviour 62: 209–220.Google Scholar