Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T01:54:32.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plane of nutrition and the timing of the moult in cashmere goats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

M. Merchant  and
D.J. Riach
M. Merchant
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen. AB9 2QJ. UK
D.J. Riach
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen. AB9 2QJ. UK
Get access

Extract

Cashmere growth is seasonal with the majority of fibres entering a resting phase (telogen) in the winter prior to shedding in the spring. Daylength appears to be the main cue for shedding, operating primarily through prolactin (Lincoln, 1990 ; Dicks et al., 1994), but there is evidence that nutrition may influence the timing of the moult in a range of species (Ling, 1970). Yeates (1958) demonstrated a nutritional effect on the moulting of the coat in beef cattle with high levels of nutrition advancing the moult and regrowth of the replacement coat and while it has been suggested that nutrition may affect the moult in goats (McDonald et al., 1987; Ryder, 1966), there is as yet no published evidence. Shearing prior to moulting is one of the methods of harvesting cashmere and may itself have a profound influence on the moulting of the stubble and subsequent regrowth. Wool growth may be reduced locally in response to cooling of the skin, but shearing may also increase wool production when associated with increases in voluntary food intake (Bottomley,1979). An experiment was therefore conducted to examine the effects of nutrition and shearing on the timing of the moult in cashmere goats. This paper reports some preliminary results.

Type
Fibre
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 1995 , March 1995 , pp. 103
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bottomley, G.A.(1979). Weather conditions and wool growth. In Physiological and Environmental Limitations to Wool Growth. (Eds.Black, J.L. & Reis, P.J.) University of New England, NSW, Australia, pp. 115–125.Google Scholar
Dicks, P.(1992). The endocrine control and manipulation of hair follicle activity in the cashmere goat. Ph.D.thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Dicks, P., Russel, A.J.F. & Lincoln, G.A. (1994). The role of prolactin in the reactivation of hair follicles in relation to moulting in cashmere goats. Journal of Endocrinology, 143:441–448.10.1677/joe.0.1430441CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gwinner, E.(1986). Circannual Rhythms. Endogenous Annual Clocks in the Organization of Seasonal Processes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Lincoln, G.A.(1990). Correlation with changes in horns and pelage, but not reproduction, of seasonal cycles in the secretion of prolactin in rams of wild, feral and domesticated breeds of sheep. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 90:285–296.10.1530/jrf.0.0900285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ling, J.K.(1970). Pelage and moulting in wild animals with special reference to aquatic forms. Quarterly Review of Biology, 45:16-54.10.1086/406361CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, B.J., Hoey, W.A. and Hopkins, P.S.(1987). Cyclical fleece growth in cashmere goats. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 38:597–609.10.1071/AR9870597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryder, M.L.(1966). Coat structure and seasonal shedding in goats. Animal Production, 8:289–302.Google Scholar
Ryder, M.L. and Stephenson, S.K. (1968). Wool Growth. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Yeates, N.T.M. (1958). Observations on the role of nutrition in coat shedding in cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge), 50:110–112.10.1017/S0021859600029956CrossRefGoogle Scholar