Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:14:34.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Performance and carcass measures of broilers maintained on diets containing Biomin growth promoter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

E. A. Iyayi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
C. Ezeokeke
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
Get access

Extract

There has been constant efforts to increase animal protein intake in Nigeria. The need to provide protein at a low cost to consumers has stimulated continued search for new additives, which will increase the efficiency and growth rate and therefore level of production of poultry birds. This has led to the present use of growth promoters (variously called growth permitters, growth enhancers, biostimulators). Growth promoters are antimicrobials, synthetic agents or mixtures of these. These substances directly or indirectly enhance digestion and hence anabolism. They remove pathological conditions, inhibit the action of organisms causing damages to the intestinal tissues (Robin and Batty, 1986) and therefore cause growth promotion. This study reports the use of a commercial growth promoter recently introduced into the poultry market in Nigeria, on the performance of broilers

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Robin, B. and Batty, A.F. (1986). The productivity response of broilers to efrotomycin. In: 7th European Conference on Poultry Rearing, Paris, 1: 535537 Google Scholar
SAS (1992). SAS User’s Guide: Statistics Version, 5th Edition, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary N.C., USA Google Scholar
Duncan, D.B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F-tests. Biometrics, 11: 142 Google Scholar