Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T22:14:21.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In situ dry matter and crude protein degradation kinetics of sunflower meal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

Tahereh Mohammadabadi*
Affiliation:
Ferdowsi university of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Mohsen Danesh Mesgaran
Affiliation:
Ferdowsi university of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Morteza Chaji
Affiliation:
Ferdowsi university of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Get access

Extract

The use of by-product in animal nutrition is necessary since it may increase the availability of feed for animal and avoid accumulation that contributes to environmental problems. Sunflower meal is a source of supplemental protein for livestock feeding. The amount of hull or fibre in sunflower meal is the major source of variation in nutrient content of this feed. Methionin concentration in sunflower meal is high compared with other protein sources such as cottonseed meal. Sunflower meal without hulls has high degradability than sunflower meal with hull. This study was conducted to evaluate the chemical composition and in situ dry matter (DM)and crude protein (CP) degradability of three different sources of sunflower meal (high, medium and low fat).

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of official analytical chemists. 1990. Official method of analysis. 15th. AOAC. Arlington, v. a. Google Scholar
Molina Alcaide, E., Yáñez Ruiz, D. R. Moumen, A. and Martín García, A. I. 2003. Ruminal degradability and in vitro intestinal digestibility of sunflower meal and in vitro digestibility of olive by-products supplemented with urea or sunflower meal. Animal Feed Science and Technology . 110: 3–15.Google Scholar