Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T17:28:17.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How does host nutrition affect the development of a microparasitic infection?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

W.M. Brindle*
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
G.C. Emmans
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
I. Kyriazakis
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

Models that predict phenotypic responses from the interaction between genotypic descriptors and the environment are desirable both in the context of both animal production systems and evolutionary ecology. Nutrient availability is often related to the ability of a host to control an invading parasitic population and mounting an immune response is often associated with a nutritional cost. This cost is shown by the peripartuient break down of immunity (Houdijk et al., 2003) and reports of negative correlations between production and resistance traits (Rauw et al., 1998). The aim was to develop a model which is able to make predictions relating to the effects of resource allocation as determined by nutrition and genotype, on the course of microparasitic infection in farm animal hosts.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antia, R., Koella, J. C. and Perrot, V. 1996. Models of the within-host dynamics of persistent mycobacterial infections. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263: 257–263.Google Scholar
Houdijk, J. G., Jessop, N.S., Knox, D. P. and Kyriazakis, I. 2003. Breakdown of immunity to Nippostrongylus brasiliensis in lactating rats. British Journal of Nutrition 90:809–814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knap, P. W. and Bishop, S. C. 2000. Relationships between genetic change and infectious disease in domestic livestock. In: The Challenge of Genetic Change in Animal Production (ed. Hill, W. G., Bishop, S.C., McGuirk, B., Simm, G. and Webb, A.J.), pp. 65–80. BSAS, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Rauw, W. M., Kanis, E., Noordhuizen-Stassen, E.N. and Grommers, F.J. 1998. Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livestock Production Science 56:15–33.Google Scholar