Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-685pp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-11T17:43:32.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of grain storage and processing method and level of feeding on the meat quality of beef cattle offered two contrasting grass silages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

F. O. Lively*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, U.K
T. W. J. Keady
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, U.K Department of Agriculture and Rural Development for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
B. W. Moss
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Rural Development for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
D. J. Kilpatrick
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Rural Development for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
Get access

Extract

Feed is a major cost in beef production during the winter feeding period. One potential method of reducing cost is to purchase grain at harvest. However, grain must be processed either by rolling or milling prior to feeding and this is a labour intensive process. Currently labour is an expensive and scare resource on many beef units. Recently different techniques have been developed for storing and feeding grain to beef cattle, which involve the processing of the grain prior to storage. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the effects of grain storage and processing method, and grain feed level on the meat quality of beef cattle offered two contrasting grass silages.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Keady, T. W. J. and Kilpatrick, D. C. 2005. The effects of grain storage and processing method and level of feeding on the performance of finishing beef cattle offered two contrasting grass silages Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science: 5.Google Scholar
Okeudo, N. J. and Moss, B. W. 2004. Interrelationships amongst carcass and meat quality characteristics of sheep. Meat Science, 69: 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar