Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T06:32:09.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of feed additives on the development on the ileal bacterial community of the broiler chicken

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

M D Lee ,
C L Hofacre  and
J Lu
M D Lee*
Affiliation:
The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
J Lu
Affiliation:
The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access

Extract

Intensifying concerns about the use of antimicrobials in meat and poultry production has enhanced interest in the application of prebiotics, probiotics, and enzymes to enhance growth and prevent disease in food animals. Growth- promoting antibiotics enhance growth of animals either by reducing the load of bacteria in the intestine, reducing colonization by intestinal pathogens, or by enhancing the growth and/or metabolism of beneficial bacteria in the intestine. Therefore other types of treatments could theoretically elicit similar responses as the use of antimicrobials.

Type
Invited papers
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2006 , March 2006 , pp. 220
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 The American Society of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Lu, J., Sanchez, S., Hofacre, C., Maurer, J. J., Harmon, B. G. and Lee, M. D. 2003. Evaluation of broiler litter with reference to the microbial composition as assessed by using 16S rRNA and functional gene markers. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 69: 901-8.Google Scholar
Lu, J., Idris, U., Harmon, B., Hofacre, C., Maurer, J.J., Lee, M.D. 2003. Diversity and succession of the intestinal bacterial community of the maturing broiler chicken. Appl. Env. Microbiol 69: 6816-24.Google Scholar