Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T20:48:57.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of an inorganic acid blend on performance and health status in weaned piglets under Vietnamese conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

C. Lückstädt*
Affiliation:
Biomin GmbH, Herzogenburg, Austria
T. Steiner
Affiliation:
Biomin GmbH, Herzogenburg, Austria
Get access

Extract

At weaning piglets are exposed to physiological and environmental stress, which often result in reduced feed intake and little or no weight gain (Ravindran and Kornegay, 1993). During the last few decades, diets for weaning piglets have been boosted with various antibiotics in prophylactic doses against gastrointestinal disorders in order to obtain economic benefits due to improved growth rates (4 to 15%) and feed efficiency (2 to 6%; Mroz, 2003). However, growing public concern about the use of antibiotics in animal agriculture and the risk of developing cross-resistance of pathogens to antibiotics used in human therapy has prompted the pig industry to look for alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters that will give similar pig performance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of inorganic acids (phosphoric acid) for nursery pig diets in order to determine their effects on weight gain, diarrhoea and resistance to illness.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mroz, Z. 2003 Organic acids of various origin and physicochemical forms as potential growth promoters for pigs. In: Digestive Physiology in Pigs. Proc. 9th Symposium, pp. 267–293.Google Scholar
Ravindran, V. and Kornegay, E. T. 1993. Acidification of weaner pig diets: A review. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 62: 313–322.Google Scholar