Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T17:10:46.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of the pea to wheat ratio and harvest date on the voluntary feed intake, in vivo digestibility and nitrogen retention of pea-wheat bi-crop silages by sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

A.T. Adesogan ,
M.B. Salawu  and
E.R. Deaville
A.T. Adesogan
Affiliation:
Welsh Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth SY23 3AL, UK
M.B. Salawu
Affiliation:
Welsh Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth SY23 3AL, UK
E.R. Deaville
Affiliation:
ADAS Nutrition Sciences Research Unit, Strafford-Upon-Avon, Warwickshire CV37 9RQ, UK
Get access

Extract

Pea-wheat bi-crop silages were reported to have moderate nutritive value when the proportion of peas in the sward was less than 200 g/kg (Adesogan et al., 1999). These authors also suggested that improvements in the digestibility, intake and nitrogen (N) balance of the forages may result from increasing the proportion of peas in the sward. This experiment was designed to examine this theory by determining the in vivo apparent digestibility, N retention and voluntary feed intake (VFI) in sheep of pea-wheat bi-crop silages containing different ratios of peas to wheat and harvested at two stages of growth.

Type
Poster Presentations
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2000 , 2000 , pp. 81
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adesogan, T.A., Salawu, M.B., Fraser, M.D., Evans, S.T., Fychan, R. and Jones, R. 1999. Intake, digestibility in vivo and nitrogen balance in sheep of pea-wheat bi-crop silages harvested at three stages of maturity. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science.Google Scholar