Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T20:44:32.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of giving the food allowance in one, two or three meals per day on the post-feeding behaviour of pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

C A Morgan
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
A.B. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Get access

Extract

Stereotypic behaviour in pregnant sows is related to food restriction, occurs in the post prandial period (Terlouw, Lawrence and Illius, 1991) and may be linked to continued existence of feeding motivation after a small meal of concentrate food (Lawrence and Illius 1989). Lawrence and Terlouw (1993) suggested that feeding motivation is heightened by positive feedback from the act of eating, while the negative feedback from absorbed nutrients may be insufficient to produce satiation. The resulting foraging behaviour is then channelled towards simple and repeated behavioural acts. In an attempt to manipulate positive feedback signals growing pigs were given a restricted food allowance in one, two or three meals per day and their behaviour was observed during the post-prandial period.

Type
Pig Behaviour
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lawrence, A.B. and Illius, A.W. 1989. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 24, 273285 10.1016/0168-1591(89)90056-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, A.B. and Terlouw, E.M.C. 1993. Journal of Animal Science, 71, 28152825 10.2527/1993.71102815xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlouw, E.M.C, Lawrence, A.B. and Illius, A.W. 1991, Animal Behaviour, 42, 981991.10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80151-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar