Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T01:50:25.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of dietary protein and energy sources on ruminal accumulation of low molecular weight peptides in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

M. Danesh Mesgaran  and
D.S. Parker
M. Danesh Mesgaran
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Nutritional Sciences, The University Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1, 7RU
D.S. Parker
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Nutritional Sciences, The University Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1, 7RU
Get access

Extract

Peptides are intermediates in the conversion of ingested protein to ammonia in the rumen and their presence in rumen fluid is influenced by the nature and amount of protein in the diet (2). Transient accumulation of peptides occurs after feeding and then their concentration declines (1,6). However, it is not clear what properties of natually occuring peptide moieties result is increased resistance to degradation in the rumen (5). The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of altering the dietary sources of available energy and protein on the accumulation of peptides in the ruminal fluid.

Type
Sheep Nutrition
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 1995 , March 1995 , pp. 92
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Broderick, G. A., and Wallace, R. J. J. Anim. Sci. 66:2233–2238, 1988.10.2527/jas1988.6692233xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Chen, G., Sniffen, C.J., and Russel, J.B. J.Dairy Sci. 70: 983–992, 1987.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80103-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Seal, C. J., and Parker, D. S. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 99B: 679–685, 1991.Google Scholar
4 Wallace, R. J., and McKain, N. J. Agric. Sci. (camb). 114: 101–105, 1990.10.1017/S0021859600071057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Wallace, R. J., Newbold, C. J., Watt, N. D., Buchan, V., and Brown, D. S. J. Agric. Sci. (camb). 120: 129–133, 1993.10.1017/S002185960007369XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Williams, P.A., and Cockbura, J.E. J. Sci. food Agric. 56: 303–314, 1991.10.1002/jsfa.2740560306CrossRefGoogle Scholar