Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T17:13:03.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of guanaco (Lama guanicoe) and sheep forestomach liquors as inocula for in vitro digestibility determinations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2021

M.D. Fraser ,
D. Wadwah  and
D.H. Baker
M.D. Fraser
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3EB, UK
D. Wadwah
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3EB, UK
D.H. Baker
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3EB, UK
Get access

Extract

Although camelids are not taxonomically classified as ruminants, they are functional ruminants. Their digestive system includes a compartmentalised forestomach with a microbial population, and they have apparently evolved the same general characteristics of regurgitation and remastication of food. In vitro digestibility results for camelid diets produced using feeds and rumen liquor from conventional ruminants have been reported. However, the assumption that donor liquor from a true ruminant species is a valid substitute for that from a camelid species has not been verified. The aim of this experiment was to compare these different sources of digesta as inocula for in vitro dry matter disappearance (DMD) determinations.

Type
Programme
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 1998 , 1998 , pp. 137
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fraser, M.D. & Baker, D.H. 1997. Comparative voluntary intake and in vivo digestibility in guanacos (Lama guanicoe) and sheep. Proceedings BSAS Winter Meeting, Scarborough, p. 165.Google Scholar
Minson, D.J. and McLeod, M.N. 1972. The in vitro technique: Its modification for estimating digestibility of large numbers of tropical pasture samples. Division of Tropical Pasture Technical Paper No.8, CSIRO, Australia, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
Tilley, J.M.A. and Terry, R.A. 1963. A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18: 104–111.10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar