Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T12:38:48.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between judge assessment of ‘collective marks’ and overall performance within an elite level dressage competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

T C Whitaker ,
A A Mills ,
R Kane  and
R Murray
T C Whitaker*
Affiliation:
Writtle College, Centre for Equine and Animal Science, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom
A A Mills
Affiliation:
Writtle College, Centre for Equine and Animal Science, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom
R Kane
Affiliation:
Writtle College, Centre for Equine and Animal Science, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom
R Murray
Affiliation:
Centre for Equine Studies, The Animal Health Trust, Newmarket, Suffolk, United Kingdom
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access

Extract

Dressage competitions consist of the subjective scoring of a number of set movements performed in a specific order within an arena. Hinnemann and van Baalen (2003) suggested that the ‘collective’ marks awarded are a good judgement of the relative behaviour of a horse performing a dressage test. Those animals that are observed to be more relaxed, calm and appear comfortable in their work are generally awarded higher collective marks. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between collective marks and overall score (i.e. level of performance) within a dressage competition.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2009 , April 2009 , pp. 4
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hinnemann, J. and van Baalen, C. (2003) The Simplicity of Dressage. J A Allen: London.Google Scholar