Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:36:43.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Quantities of Herbage Eaten by Grazing Dairy Cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2016

D. S. MacLusky
D. S. MacLusky*
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Get access

Extract

The herbage dry matter intake of grazing animals may be estimated by chemical marker and faecal analysis methods (Raymond, 1954) or by pasture sampling methods.

Pasture sampling methods generally involve two main difficulties. The first is the low precision resulting from the variability of pasture yields. When intake is estimated from the difference between the yields of herbage on a given area sampled before and after the grazing period, the estimate bears the error variances of both the sample means. The second difficulty lies in ensuring that the estimated difference in yields is the true difference due to consumption. The samples must be cut below the level to which the animal can graze, and the amount of herbage growth during the grazing period must be estimated and allowed for. Growth can be estimated from the difference between the yield of herbage before grazing and the yield of protected herbage at the end of the grazing period.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production , Volume 1955 , 1955 , pp. 45 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cowlishaw, S. J., 1951. The effect of sampling cages on the yields of herbage. J. Brit. Grassl. Soc, 6: 179.Google Scholar
Jarl, F., 1952. The use of forage in dairy production. Proc. 6th int. Grassl. Congr., 1179.Google Scholar
Linehan, P. A., Lowe, J., & Stewart, R. H., 1952. The output of pasture and its measurement. Pt. 3. J. Brit. Grassl. Soc, 7: 73.Google Scholar
Raymond, W. F., 1954. Studies in the digestibility of herbage. 3. The use of faecal collection and chemical analysis in pasture studies—(a) ratio and tracer methods. J. Brit. Grassl. Soc, 9: 61.Google Scholar
Waite, R., Holmes, W., Campbell, , Jean, I., & Fergusson, D. L., 1951. Studies in grazing management. Pt. 3. The amount and chemical composition of herbage eaten by dairy cattle under close-folding and rotational methods of grazing. J. agric Set, 40: 392.Google Scholar
Williams, , Stella S., , 1951. Microenvironment in relation to experimental techniques. J. Brit. Grassl. Soc, 6: 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E., 1948. Rations for livestock. Bull. Minist. Agric. (Lond.), No. 48.Google Scholar