Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:23:32.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The importance of the dry period in the control of mastitis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2016

J. Oliver ,
F. H. Dodd  and
F. K. Neave
J. Oliver
Affiliation:
The National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Berkshire
F. H. Dodd
Affiliation:
The National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Berkshire
F. K. Neave
Affiliation:
The National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Berkshire
Get access

Extract

The variations in the incidence of mastitis and infection with stage in lactation of dairy cattle have been the subject of a number of investigations (Oliver, 1955) but until recent years the udder health of dry cows has been given little attention. This is surprising, because many cows are dry for almost three months in each year and the dry period is immediately followed by a few weeks when the incidence of mastitis is high (Oliver et al .,1956a).

During the last ten years a study has been made at this Institute of the importance of the dry period to the control of mastitis in dairy cattle. The object of this article is to review the progress made.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production , Volume 1956 , 1956 , pp. 33 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Neave, F. K., Dodd, F. H., &Henriques, E., 1950. Udder infections in the ‘dry period’. I. Dairy Res. , 17: 37.Google Scholar
Neave, F. K., Dodd, F. H., & Lee, J. M., 1951. Rep. nat. Inst. Res. Dairy [Reading], 1951: 23.Google Scholar
Neave, F. K., Higgs, T. M., Simpkin, D., Oliver, J., &Dodd, F. H., 1954. The relationship between mastitis and the method of stripping after machine milking. J. Dairy Res., 21: 10.Google Scholar
Oliver, J., 1955. The influence of environmental and physiological factors on udder health. Dairy Sci. Abstr., 17: 353, 445.Google Scholar
Oliver, J., Dodd, F. H., Neave, F. K., &Bailey, G. L., 1956a. Variations in the incidence of udder infection and mastitis with stage in lactation, age and season of the year. J. Dairy Res., 23: 181.Google Scholar
Oliver, J., Dodd, F. H., Neave, F. K., &Lee, J. M., 1956b. Udder infections in the ‘dry period’. II. The effect of withdrawing secretion from the dry udder on the incidence of infection. J. Dairy Res., 23: 194.Google Scholar
Oliver, J., Dodd, F. H., &Neave, F. K., 1956c. Udder infections in the ‘dry period’. III. The method of drying-off cows at the end of lactation. J. Dairy Res. 23: 197.Google Scholar
Oliver, J., Dodd, F. H., &Neave, F. K., 1956d. Udder infections in the ‘dry period’. IV. The relationship between the new infection rate in the early dry period and the daily milk yield at drying-off when lactation was ended by either intermittent or abrupt cessation of milking. J. Dairy Res., 23: 204.Google Scholar
Oliver, J., Dodd, F. H., &Neave, F. K., 1956e. Udder infections in the ‘dry period’. V. The effect of teat disinfection at drying-off on the incidence of infections in the early dry period. J. Dairy Res. 23: 212.Google Scholar