Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:29:11.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationships between observable oestrous behaviour and the number of heifers in oestrus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

D Pullar
Affiliation:
ADAS High Mowthorpe, Duggleby, Malton, North Yorks, Y017 8BP
C.A Collins
Affiliation:
ADAS Cheltenham, Rivershill House, St George's Road, Cheltenham, GL50 3EY
Get access

Extract

The accurate detection of oestrus in beef and dairy cows prior to AI or embryo transfer (ET) is essential if optimal pregnancy rates are to be acheived. In dairy cows under normal husbandry conditions only 55% of normally cycling animals are correctly detected in oestrus and inseminated at the appropriate time (Esslemont and Bryant 1976). The use of pedometers, changes in milk yield, milk progesterone and trained sniffer dogs are all methods which can significantly improve the oestrus detection and hence pregnancy rates acheived by AI (Phillips and Schofield, 1988: McLeod, Foulkes, Williams and Weller, 1991; Jezierski, 1988) . However, oestrus detection by visual monitoring is still the most widely used method of detection.

To ensure high pregnancy rates from AI or ET when visual oestrus detection methods are used the form and range of behaviours which cattle perform needs to be understood. There are a wide range of oestrus behaviour patterns displayed both within and between individual cows so deciding on the correct time for AI or ET depends on interpreting the available evidence. This paper reports the behaviour of maiden heifers during natural oestrus and following a pharmacologically induced oestrus (designed to synchronise the time of oestrus for a number of heifers). By understanding the range of oestrus behaviour patterns guidelines can be established for observation methods and the interpretation of oestrus behaviour. This should enable the prediction of the optimum times for AI or ET. A corresponding improvement in the number of pregnancies should be acheived.

Type
Ruminant Reproduction
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Refererences

Broadbent, P.J., Stewart, M. and Dolman, D. F. 1991. Recipient management and embryo transfer. Theriogenoloqy 35: 125139.Google Scholar
Esslemont, R.J. and Bryant, M.J. 1976. Oestrus behavoiur in a herd of dairy cows. Veterinary Record 99: 472475.Google Scholar
Jezierski, T. 1988. The use of a trained dog for detection of oestrus related odors in dairy cows. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Applied Animal Ethology in Farm Animals, pp39-43. (Eds, Unshelm, , Putten, , Zeeb, and Ekesbo, ). Darmstadt, German Federal Republic.Google Scholar
McLeod, B.J., Foulkes, J.A., Williams, M. E. and Weller, R.F. 1991. Predicting the time of ovulation in dairy cows using on-farm progesterone kits. Animal Production 52: 19 Google Scholar
Phillips, C.J.C. and Schofield, S.A. 1988. A comparison of oestrus detection by pedometer, milk progesterone content, electrical conductivity of vaginal mucus and milk yield changes. In: Proceedings of VI World Congress on Animal Production, pp584. Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar